steadyshot
01-01-2004, 07:52 AM
Since the sniper attacks the U.S. liberal politicians want to add the AR-15 type and all sniper rifles to the ban lists. The U.N. has a different agenda!!!!!!!!!!!!
The United Nations has propsed for several years to use U.S. citizen money, our tax dollars, to let a police force, of course including U.S. troops enter our country. The proposal states that this peace corp, will seize all of the registered assault weapons being owned by U.S. citizens. We will be allowed to keep a single shot rifle, a single shot shotgun, both for hunting, and a handgun with lowcap mags for self defense.
That is an outrageous proposal. But can you believe that some of our law makers entertained these proposals? I think our past politicians that created the Constitution are probably turning over in their graves. This great country was built by guns. The only reason that Japan did not invade our shore with a ground force in WWII was because the Jap general were afraid of Jap soldier casulaties, due to the great number of civilians owning firearms.
I know what would happen if those liberal bastards remotley had a thought of seizing citizens' weapons.
I will comment no further, due to the laws now enabling the government to by pass our rights and tap our phones and read our e-mail. I don't want to be labled as a threat or anything. So Mr. Fed I am just stating an opinon, if you are reading this. I am not an anarchist, terrorist, or involved with a militia. I am a simple U. S. loving, God fearing cajun, who has an opinion. I am college educated, and in law enforcement, for the last ten years. I defend democracy and deter civil unrest and disobedience. I believe that I do have a right to exercise my civil rights, since the communist bastards from the U. N. are trying to take my right to bear arms away from me.
Below I have some facts and links. Please read them, this educates us all. Thank You.
I will find these proposed bans again and I will posts them!!!!!!!!
United Nations Gun Control?
International gun control by the United Nations may sound like a far-right-wing conspiracy theory. However, at a recent United Nations meeting in Brazil, international delegates discussed a world moratorium on selling guns; banning the manufacture and sale of ammunitions; world-wide licensing for all gun owners; and limiting individual purchases of guns to one per person per month.
But don't worry, says a UN spokesman. The organization is at least two years away from any decision on the issue.
(Source: Atlanta Journal Constitution)
Miller continues, "At this time the only barrier between a binding treaty on small arms and light weapons is the United States delegation. They have strongly and consistently insisted that the only issue for the United Nations is the illegal transfer of SALW, not civilian ownership and possession of firearms. If there is a change in the United States administration in 2004, the strength of opposition to United Nations control of civilian ownership of firearms could be significantly weakened."
This isn't something that is just going to go away. Once again, freedom isn't free -- it demands vigilance and attention to things you wouldn't think had much effect on an average Valley resident.
Outdoors in Alaska, by Howard Delo
A U.N. group is working toward establishment of an international system to register and regulate civilian possession of firearms, according to a former congressman.
The ultimate aim of many members of the conference on small arms is to outlaw personal ownership of guns altogether, said Georgia Republican Bob Barr in an interview yesterday on the newly syndicated WorldNetDaily Report with Joseph Farah.
The Frontiersman
It's no longer a secret the United Nations wants to establish some kind of global tax scheme and impose global gun control. If the United Nations can do both at the same time, it will.
To make certain the United Nations has a clear understanding of the position of the United States, Congressman Ron Paul, along with ten other congressmen, introduced H.R. 3125 - The Right to
Keep and Bear Arms Act of 2003.
According to H.R. 3125, Congress finds that:
1. over the past decade, the United Nations has demonstrated a consistent animus to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and to the right to keep and bear arms;
2. in June 2003, the United Nations sponsored a "Week of Action Against Small Arms";
3. French President Jacques Chirac and the socialist president of Brazil Luiz Lula da Silva both
advocate the imposition of a United Nations' tax on firearms for various utopian purposes;
4. two million largely unarmed people are killed yearly by oppressive genocidal governments throughout the world; and
5. ironically, at the same time the United Nations was working to prohibit Americans from
exercising their Second Amendment rights to defend themselves, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms was called to investigate the illegal possession of submachine guns by bodyguards to Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan.
Kent Snyder
The Liberty Committee
The UN report makes 24 recommendations and many more suggestions that add up to a comprehensive program for global gun control, including:
"All small arms and light weapons which are not under legal civilian possession and which are not required for the purposes of national defense and internal security, should be collected and destroyed by States as expeditiously as possible.
"All States should ensure that they have in place adequate laws, regulations and administrative procedures to exercise effective control over the legal possession of small arms....
States are encouraged to integrate measures to control ammunition..."
Times Digest and NewsBytes
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
http://www.zetetics.com/mac/ifeminists/2001/0717.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32960
http://www.getusout.org/materials/gun_control.htm
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2002/02-11-2002/vo18no03_firearms.htm
http://www.totse.com/en/politics/right_to_keep_and_bear_arms/unguns.html
http://www.comeandtakeit.com/ungun1.html#GOA-UN-G
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2001/11-19-2001/vo17no24_gun_grab.htm
http://www.comeandtakeit.com/ungun1.html
http://vikingphoenix.com/news/stn/1997/pirn9789.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33584
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/7/16/153127.shtml
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/s326693.htm
http://www.triggerfinger.org/weblog/category/20.jsp
http://www.ssaa.org.au/UNpage2.html
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/26/141304.shtml
http://www.ssaa.org.au/Unasltban.html
http://www.iahf.com/world/un.html
http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/jul/30/carlson.htm
http://disarmament.un.org:8080/education/docs/napf.pdf
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/DC2792.doc.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3747310005e2.htm
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2001/08-13-2001/vo17no17_disarmament.htm
According to the UN an AK47 rifle can be bought in Uganda for the price of a chicken, in Kenya for the price of a goat and in Mozambique for the price of a sack of corn
ROOOOOOOOAD TRIIIIIIIIIIP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The United Nations has propsed for several years to use U.S. citizen money, our tax dollars, to let a police force, of course including U.S. troops enter our country. The proposal states that this peace corp, will seize all of the registered assault weapons being owned by U.S. citizens. We will be allowed to keep a single shot rifle, a single shot shotgun, both for hunting, and a handgun with lowcap mags for self defense.
That is an outrageous proposal. But can you believe that some of our law makers entertained these proposals? I think our past politicians that created the Constitution are probably turning over in their graves. This great country was built by guns. The only reason that Japan did not invade our shore with a ground force in WWII was because the Jap general were afraid of Jap soldier casulaties, due to the great number of civilians owning firearms.
I know what would happen if those liberal bastards remotley had a thought of seizing citizens' weapons.
I will comment no further, due to the laws now enabling the government to by pass our rights and tap our phones and read our e-mail. I don't want to be labled as a threat or anything. So Mr. Fed I am just stating an opinon, if you are reading this. I am not an anarchist, terrorist, or involved with a militia. I am a simple U. S. loving, God fearing cajun, who has an opinion. I am college educated, and in law enforcement, for the last ten years. I defend democracy and deter civil unrest and disobedience. I believe that I do have a right to exercise my civil rights, since the communist bastards from the U. N. are trying to take my right to bear arms away from me.
Below I have some facts and links. Please read them, this educates us all. Thank You.
I will find these proposed bans again and I will posts them!!!!!!!!
United Nations Gun Control?
International gun control by the United Nations may sound like a far-right-wing conspiracy theory. However, at a recent United Nations meeting in Brazil, international delegates discussed a world moratorium on selling guns; banning the manufacture and sale of ammunitions; world-wide licensing for all gun owners; and limiting individual purchases of guns to one per person per month.
But don't worry, says a UN spokesman. The organization is at least two years away from any decision on the issue.
(Source: Atlanta Journal Constitution)
Miller continues, "At this time the only barrier between a binding treaty on small arms and light weapons is the United States delegation. They have strongly and consistently insisted that the only issue for the United Nations is the illegal transfer of SALW, not civilian ownership and possession of firearms. If there is a change in the United States administration in 2004, the strength of opposition to United Nations control of civilian ownership of firearms could be significantly weakened."
This isn't something that is just going to go away. Once again, freedom isn't free -- it demands vigilance and attention to things you wouldn't think had much effect on an average Valley resident.
Outdoors in Alaska, by Howard Delo
A U.N. group is working toward establishment of an international system to register and regulate civilian possession of firearms, according to a former congressman.
The ultimate aim of many members of the conference on small arms is to outlaw personal ownership of guns altogether, said Georgia Republican Bob Barr in an interview yesterday on the newly syndicated WorldNetDaily Report with Joseph Farah.
The Frontiersman
It's no longer a secret the United Nations wants to establish some kind of global tax scheme and impose global gun control. If the United Nations can do both at the same time, it will.
To make certain the United Nations has a clear understanding of the position of the United States, Congressman Ron Paul, along with ten other congressmen, introduced H.R. 3125 - The Right to
Keep and Bear Arms Act of 2003.
According to H.R. 3125, Congress finds that:
1. over the past decade, the United Nations has demonstrated a consistent animus to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and to the right to keep and bear arms;
2. in June 2003, the United Nations sponsored a "Week of Action Against Small Arms";
3. French President Jacques Chirac and the socialist president of Brazil Luiz Lula da Silva both
advocate the imposition of a United Nations' tax on firearms for various utopian purposes;
4. two million largely unarmed people are killed yearly by oppressive genocidal governments throughout the world; and
5. ironically, at the same time the United Nations was working to prohibit Americans from
exercising their Second Amendment rights to defend themselves, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco
and Firearms was called to investigate the illegal possession of submachine guns by bodyguards to Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan.
Kent Snyder
The Liberty Committee
The UN report makes 24 recommendations and many more suggestions that add up to a comprehensive program for global gun control, including:
"All small arms and light weapons which are not under legal civilian possession and which are not required for the purposes of national defense and internal security, should be collected and destroyed by States as expeditiously as possible.
"All States should ensure that they have in place adequate laws, regulations and administrative procedures to exercise effective control over the legal possession of small arms....
States are encouraged to integrate measures to control ammunition..."
Times Digest and NewsBytes
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
© 1999 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
During his address before the United Nations (UN) General Assembly on September 22nd last year, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan proclaimed that "state sovereignty, in its most basic sense, is being redefined.... A new, broader definition of national interest is needed in the new century [where] the collective interest is the national interest." Key to the "collective interest" of the international community is the need for disarmament and civilian gun control. As long as civilians and nations have the ability to defend themselves, global governance will be difficult, if not impossible, to administer.
Global gun control efforts date back to 1959, when Wall Street lawyer Grenville Clark and Professor Louis B. Sohn wrote their book, World Peace Through World Law. Clark was then vice president of the United World Federalists, a well connected group dedicated to world government. The book details a plan for a structure of a web of international law where a "world police force" would be vested with "a coercive force of overwhelming power." "This world police force," note Clark and Sohn, "would be the only military force permitted anywhere in the world after the process of national disarmament has been completed." The only small arms allowed would be those as "reasonably needed by duly licensed hunters or by duly licensed individuals for personal protection."
The United Nations wants to disarm Americans and other gun owners around the world. No, this is not some wild claim cooked up by the fevered imaginations of militia crazies. For the past couple of years, three different U.N. agencies--the U.N. Disarmament Commission, the U.N. Panel of Governmental Experts on Small Arms, and the U.N. Economic and Social Council's Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice--have been holding meetings to devise policies to control "light weapons."
Global Gun Grabbers
By Ronald Bailey
http://www.mcsm.org/global.html
http://free.freespeech.org/unlimitedfreedom/guns.html
Handgun Control, Inc.
"Our ultimate goal - total control of handguns in the United States is going to take time."
"The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country.
"The second problem is to get handguns registered."
"And the final problem is to make to possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition - except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal."
HCI's founder Pete Shields as quoted in The New Yorker, July 26, 1976.
http://www.jpfo.org/deathgc.htm
Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as
weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your
Ruger rifle, or your Winchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by
several persons as a crew.
Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear
that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade
must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.
The 18-page Draft Programme of Action to be presented to the July conference
sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide
availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target
because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other
democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or
severely restricted private gun ownership.
All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be
confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that
"no retransfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior
authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the
possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military
and police forces."
As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new
ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in
"public destruction events."
http://www.freedomcommittee.com
http://www.freedomcommittee.com/freedom/fpc-news-archive/2001-Jun/msg00003.html
Disarmament enthusiasts have long called upon world leaders to scrap all weapons and eliminate the potential for war. But this program is not about the elimination of weapons, but about placing all military power in the hands of one global power.
For several decades, pro-UN propaganda has held that furnishing the world body with enough power to "enforce peace" would benefit mankind and forestall the possibility of future wars. But there are some crucial questions that few consider: If the UN should become all-powerful, who would be left to prevent it from establishing its own brand of tyranny? If the UN were powerful enough to enforce peace, would it not also be powerful enough to enforce the will of its leaders on all mankind? http://www.beachbrowser.com/_Freedom_forum/000000b9.htm
Traders in Congress http://www.iahf.com/world/20010722.html
And You think that it can't happen here???http://www.khouse.org/articles/political/19980301-112.html
Great informative sight http://www.gunssavelife.com/un2.htm
http://www.zetetics.com/mac/ifeminists/2001/0717.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32960
http://www.getusout.org/materials/gun_control.htm
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2002/02-11-2002/vo18no03_firearms.htm
http://www.totse.com/en/politics/right_to_keep_and_bear_arms/unguns.html
http://www.comeandtakeit.com/ungun1.html#GOA-UN-G
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2001/11-19-2001/vo17no24_gun_grab.htm
http://www.comeandtakeit.com/ungun1.html
http://vikingphoenix.com/news/stn/1997/pirn9789.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33584
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/7/16/153127.shtml
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/s326693.htm
http://www.triggerfinger.org/weblog/category/20.jsp
http://www.ssaa.org.au/UNpage2.html
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/11/26/141304.shtml
http://www.ssaa.org.au/Unasltban.html
http://www.iahf.com/world/un.html
http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/jul/30/carlson.htm
http://disarmament.un.org:8080/education/docs/napf.pdf
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/DC2792.doc.htm
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3747310005e2.htm
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2001/08-13-2001/vo17no17_disarmament.htm
According to the UN an AK47 rifle can be bought in Uganda for the price of a chicken, in Kenya for the price of a goat and in Mozambique for the price of a sack of corn
ROOOOOOOOAD TRIIIIIIIIIIP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!