Reviews

[Messiah]

Is anything going to be done with the reviews? The review of the MAK-90 is particularly...disconcerting. Seems to badmouth a perfectly good rifle (one which, in fact, has often been said to be of much better quality and finish than the Romanian SAR-series).

Also, the pic for that review wouldn't load the last few times I've tried....

[mick]

Excellent questions. I believe we will be instituting new reviews in the future, but I'm not positive when...

I don't have a MAK-90 to review. Would you like to provide a review??

Lots of the pics on the main portion of the site are coming up as red "X's" at times because of the way the URLs are pointing to the site. This happened when we finally got the AK-47.NET domain to point right. Chris needs to update the coding but has not yet had time.

[EvilAdministratorxx]

Images on the main site will be fixed this weekend. There will also be a new area which will provide for reviews/ratings that will be up and running soon.

[Messiah]

Originally posted by mick
Excellent questions. I believe we will be instituting new reviews in the future, but I'm not positive when...

I don't have a MAK-90 to review. Would you like to provide a review??

I might be willing to do that, if there isn't anyone else more qualified. I own two of them myself, but haven't had much experience with other variants to compare it to.

Here is an idea for doing the reviews, if it hasn't occured to you guys already. Set it up where people can add their own mini-reviews, rather than just take one or two people's word for it. Some folks might have different experiences than the few who actually write the reviews (case in point, the aforementioned MAK-90 review).

Lots of the pics on the main portion of the site are coming up as red "X's" at times because of the way the URLs are pointing to the site. This happened when we finally got the AK-47.NET domain to point right. Chris needs to update the coding but has not yet had time.

Pic still broken as of today (10/08).