JES AR15
01-08-2002, 10:59 AM
please tell me what you think this is worth
it seems to check out as far as parts goes, but i'm not sure on the finish. is it a FTR finish or do you think he did it himself, or maybe a NAVY ARMS rebuild ? either way it looks good ! but i don't want to by a $100 gun that has $5 of somebodies paint on it. know what i mean.
his words :
A No.4 Mk.I Enfield Rifle in Excellent Condition. This rifle was produced at the Royal Ordnance Factory Frazakerley in November of 1943 and put through Factory Thorough Repair sometime in 1948. At this time a new serial number was applied to the
rifle, all FTR serial numbers on this rifle match.
I would rate the finish at 99% on the rifle itself, the meal parts on
the front of the forestock and upper handguard I would rate at EX. The
Butt plate I would rate at about 80-85%
The picture I posted of the left side of the receiver shows the worst of
the dents, no now that I look at it there are some more forward of the
lower barrel band, nothing big and evil though
The bore is slightly dark with sharp edges to the lands.
it SAAMI headspaces on a #1 bolthead.
The buttplate appears to be blacken (or painted) brass.
Forgot to say, yes the numbers match from the FTR (receiver, butt
socket, forestock) that I have seen.
me:
http://www.9mmlargo.com/sell/enfield/enfield.htm
what do you think ?
it seems to check out as far as parts goes, but i'm not sure on the finish. is it a FTR finish or do you think he did it himself, or maybe a NAVY ARMS rebuild ? either way it looks good ! but i don't want to by a $100 gun that has $5 of somebodies paint on it. know what i mean.
his words :
A No.4 Mk.I Enfield Rifle in Excellent Condition. This rifle was produced at the Royal Ordnance Factory Frazakerley in November of 1943 and put through Factory Thorough Repair sometime in 1948. At this time a new serial number was applied to the
rifle, all FTR serial numbers on this rifle match.
I would rate the finish at 99% on the rifle itself, the meal parts on
the front of the forestock and upper handguard I would rate at EX. The
Butt plate I would rate at about 80-85%
The picture I posted of the left side of the receiver shows the worst of
the dents, no now that I look at it there are some more forward of the
lower barrel band, nothing big and evil though
The bore is slightly dark with sharp edges to the lands.
it SAAMI headspaces on a #1 bolthead.
The buttplate appears to be blacken (or painted) brass.
Forgot to say, yes the numbers match from the FTR (receiver, butt
socket, forestock) that I have seen.
me:
http://www.9mmlargo.com/sell/enfield/enfield.htm
what do you think ?