PDA

View Full Version : VA - Bill amended to allow visitors guns in public places


Steven Mace
02-24-2002, 07:57 PM
Bill amended to allow visitors guns in public places

By BOB LEWIS, Associated Press
© February 22, 2002

RICHMOND -- An amendment attached Friday to a Senate bill limiting restrictions on firearms in some public buildings would disarm public employees while allowing visitors to pack heat, the measure's sponsor said.

By deleting three words in Senate Bill 593, the House Militia and Police Committee allows local governments to bar employees from bringing firearms to work, but it would not allow localities to prevent visitors from bringing guns into certain public offices.

By a 17-5 vote, the panel -- dominated by pro-Second Amendment delegates -- advanced the amended version of Sen. Emmett W. Hanger's bill to a House floor vote.

The committee acted while the Senate was in session, and Hanger was not present for the vote. Hanger, R-Augusta, said he was disappointed that the committee pushed the bill further than he intended.

``Localities, by various resolutions and ordinances, were continuing to chip away at what was intended,'' Hanger said. ``Uniformity is the real issue.''

He said he hoped the committee's amendment would be stripped, either on the House floor or, if it passes, in a House-Senate conference committee where differences over the two versions of the bill are resolved.

``What we're trying to do is make sure local government doesn't do something it's not supposed to,'' said Del. H. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, a committee member and the House majority leader, arguing against a patchwork of gun ordinances across the state.

``This is the place where that bill should be debated, not in those courthouses and city halls,'' he said. ``It does boggle my mind that people want to try to interfere with people's constitutional right.''

Del. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Prince William, said people who have obtained concealed weapons permits are law-abiding and should not be treated as criminals when entering public buildings.

The amendment sends a chilling signal to localities concerned about protecting their workers, Del. James M. Scott, D-Fairfax, said in recalling a death threat he received when he served on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors.

``This is a fairly modest effort to come to some sort of compromise, and I can't understand why we won't accept it,'' he said, arguing against the amendment.

The Virginia Municipal League, which did not oppose Hanger's original bill, was outspoken against the amendment. Forcing urban localities to abide by the same community standards as rural counties and towns is unworkable, said VML lobbyist Mike Edwards.

``It may be perfectly acceptable in Rockingham or Page (counties) for someone to walk into a government building with a gun if he's been out target shooting, but for a young person to do that in Arlington and Alexandria -- that would not be appropriate at all,'' Edwards said.

The House this year has already defeated legislation that would have put the Capitol and its surrounding legislative buildings off-limits to people with firearms.

http://www.pilotonline.com/breaking/br0222gun.html

Steve Mace

Steven Mace
02-28-2002, 03:38 PM
Thursday, February 28, 2002

House limits cities on gun laws

Del. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, and Del. Clifton "Chip" Woodrum, D-Roanoke, were on different sides of one issue.

By MICHAEL SLUSS
THE ROANOKE TIMES

RICHMOND - The House of Delegates passed legislation Wednesday that would prohibit local governments from imposing new gun restrictions and stripped the Senate-sponsored bill of a provision that would allow governments to ban employees from bringing guns to work.

The House's action sets up a confrontation with the Senate over the bill (SB 593), sponsored by Sen. Emmett Hanger, R-Augusta County.

Hanger drafted the bill to keep counties and cities from adopting ordinances or resolutions affecting the purchase, possession or transportation of firearms - except in limited cases already allowed by state law. The bill is designed to strengthen a 1987 law that gives state government control over gun regulations.

The Senate amended the bill this month to allow local governments to prohibit their employees from bringing guns to work and to adopt other policies to protect government workers.

But Del. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, argued Wednesday that government workers should not have to surrender their right to carry a firearm while on the job.

"You're taking a fundamental freedom of protection away from the people who actually work for the city at a time when they are working for the city," said Griffith, who successfully sought to remove the employee exception from the bill.

Some Northern Virginia localities have sought authority to ban guns in office buildings and recreation centers in recent years. Rural lawmakers have resisted those efforts, arguing that law-abiding citizens with concealed weapons permits should not have to surrender their firearms in public buildings.

Griffith said the 1987 law, which was sponsored by House Speaker Vance Wilkins, R-Amherst County, was designed to keep local governments from creating "a crazy patchwork quilt" of gun regulations.

Del. Jim Scott, D-Fairfax County, called Griffith's proposal "a very, very bad idea."

Scott said he was once the target of a death threat while serving on the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors and would have felt even more uneasy knowing that someone could carry "a shotgun or even an Uzi into the meeting room."

The bill passed by a 72-27 vote. Del. Clifton "Chip" Woodrum, D-Roanoke, was the only Western Virginia lawmaker to vote against it.

Woodrum quipped that the legislation could help cities and counties enforce recycling laws.

"Your garbage men and your sanitation workers in your local governments are going to be able to enforce recycling with, shall we say, a little more teeth," Woodrum said.

Steve Mace