The Guns Network LLC ~ Discussion Forums

Go Back   The Guns Network LLC ~ Discussion Forums > Rimfire World > Rimfire World's General Forums > .22 Ammunition
User Name
Password
Portal Forums Register FAQ Members List Calendar vBRadio Mark Forums Read
* Membership Upgrade Center * Join/Renew/Upgrade your NRA membership today thru Guns Network Advertising Advertisers




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2005, 12:09 PM   #1
Byrd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 44
Question Shocking Aquila Ammo-question

At the range this week a friend brought a box of the Aquila super sonic (wrong name?) ammo that shocked us both...at 50 ft. out of his Bersa and my Beretta M21 it punched holes in the paper the size of .38 wadcutters, so it was expanding BEFORE it hit the paper! Out of my S&W m34 with 4 in bbl. it punched standard size .22 holes! What gives? Has anyone ever had this happen to them, it was not a fluke because it did it consistantly!
__________________
From above only and not beneath
Byrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 12:49 PM   #2
Darrell
Registered User
 
Darrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Springfield MO.
Posts: 532
Default

I'm guessing it was keyholing. Which means the bullets were tumbling end over end. Most likely they were not stablizing from the shorter barrels.
Twist rate of the barrels could have something to do with it also.
What grain are the bullets?
__________________
Darrell Hooton
Springfield MO.
Darrell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 02:22 PM   #3
Jericho
The Great Gopher Hunter
 
Jericho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,843
Default

I would have to agree with Darrel, I think it has to do with the short barrel. Whose bullets travel so fast that they would shoot 2" high at 100 yards for me (from the normal hi-velocity ammo that I shoot). I would say that it is not getting the proper twist that it needs to fly like it should.
__________________

Spreading the Cult of the Little Bullet: Rimfire World

GUNS NETWORK.....Often Imitated.....Never Duplicated

.
.



REDSTAR 09.05.2005
20756
Jericho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 05:33 PM   #4
Byrd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 44
Default

They were not keyholing-the hole in the target was a perfect circle with no indication of tumbling, out of the Bersa they were very accurate, my Beretta was average. I think they are 30 grain bullets. I am still puzzled as to why they would leave a hole that looked like a .38 cal wadcutter. Are shorter barreled guns rifled with a faster twist maybe? Could it be possible they were expanding before they hit the paper? I have never seen anything like this before and this is my first experience with Aquila ammo.
__________________
From above only and not beneath
Byrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2005, 09:59 PM   #5
awp101
Professional Smartass/IYDKMIGTHTKY & Team GunsNet 06/08
 
awp101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: DeeDee Snavely's Used Guns and Weapons
Posts: 21,246
Default

Supersonic or SUBsonic?

They are not expanding before hitting anything though. I've heard of rounds loaded too hot to vaporize before hitting a target (mainly varmint and very hot AR handloads) but that still wouldn't cause what you're seeing.

The Aguila Sniper Subsonic requires a certain twist rate to properly stabilize for best accuracy, so the supersonic may be rate specific as well. Shorter bbls don't necessesarily have a faster twist but what they DO lack is room to maximize the twist. Here's an example:

If a bbl is rated as a 1-12 twist that means the bullet will make one revolution per 12" of travel.

If we take a 12" bbl, the bullet will get a full revolution BEFORE it leaves the bbl which makes it more stable.

If we cut the bbl down to 3" then the bullet will only get 1/4 revolution before leaving the bbl (12 divided by 3 equals 4) which makes it less stable because it didn't get that full revolution before being subjected to the outside world.

These are the basics of the theory but it's a solid foundation to build upon. After the bullet leaves the bbl wind, muzzle blast, gravity, etc will affect bullet stability but that's a lecture for another time and place.

Besides, my brain hurts now...

HTH!
__________________
Never Say Die!

Everything Louder Than Everything Else

Spreading the Cult of the Little Bullet: Rimfire World

**********************
The Python is probably the better combat arm, but once you run out of bullets nothing screams "pistol whip" like an N-frame.


C'thulhu '12! Why settle for the lesser Evil?
awp101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2005, 02:32 PM   #6
Byrd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 44
Default

They were the Supersonic rounds-very accurate out of my friends Bersa-1 1/2 groups @ 50ft. I understands the bbl. twist, but I guess I am going to have to buy a brick of these things and try them out. I am guessing that because of the accuracy out of the Bersa they were stabilizing in the bbl. My Beretta M21 is not accurate at that distance with anything...4-5 in groups is the norm. But out of both pistols they left a perfect .38 wadcutter size hole! My S&W M34 has a one in. longer than the Bersa and it showed no indication of the larger holes. I guess this is a shooters mystery!
__________________
From above only and not beneath
Byrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 03:08 PM   #7
63DH8
3/3FA, Tiger Brigade, 2AD; 4/3FA, 2AD (fwd) & Team GunsNet GOLD
 
63DH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Parkland, Washington
Posts: 21,462
Default

Pistols will not allow cartridges to accelerate to max velocities. Ammo makers use rifles with 22, 24, and up to 26 inch barrels. They usually post the barrel length in with what the velocity list. If they don't, assume they used a barrel length that will give their ammo the best result; Usually 16 inch for centerfire and 24 inch for 22rimfire.

The general rule of thumb is you will lose 100fps per inch of barrel loss until you get to the pressure of the case upon ignition (In reality, the drop is not liner). If I remember correctly, the Agula rates their top speed .22 around 1700 fps. You said your pistol barrel is how long? I'm sure Agula tested their rounds in a rifle to give it the maximum velocity. I'd say a 26 inch, but I'll give them the benifit of the doubt of 22 inch. You can see how much of a drop in velocity you'll have with a pistol in comparison to a rifle.

Now think, if the bullet is "expanding" with a pistol, it would it hold together when fired through a rifle?

More than likely, I would say the target wasn't supported where the round made a ".38 cal" hole. With no backing, the paper will push back and create a larger hole than if the target was solidly backed with wood or something else solid. If you go shooting again and place two targets up with one paper target supported with a simple "T" type holder and another with a sheet of plywood with no holes, you'll notice larger holes on the target that's unsupported. More than likely, when you fired your pistol, there was nothing or a hole behind the impact area. That would create the larger hole. Been there, done that, questioned it, tried it, confirmed it.
__________________
Life is too short to drink bad coffee!



The last place to go...

The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.
~~~ Albert Einstein
.
.
.
.
.




(REDSTAR) Rick Peterburs - 09.05.2005 - 20756
(Zouave) Albert Richard Sparaco III - 03.31.2008 - 21007
(c4550) Frank Miller - 03.22.2008 - 05705
63DH8 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2005, 03:54 PM   #8
Byrd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 44
Default

You are correct-the target was unsupported-I will give it a try @ the next range trip. I think I will also put some newspapers in a box to catch the round and see what that tells me...I am still perplexed though! Thanks for the comments!
__________________
From above only and not beneath
Byrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 02:38 AM   #9
ugly Finn
Registered User
 
ugly Finn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Finland, land of snow & Santa
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 63DH8
Pistols will not allow cartridges to accelerate to max velocities. Ammo makers use rifles with 22, 24, and up to 26 inch barrels. They usually post the barrel length in with what the velocity list. If they don't, assume they used a barrel length that will give their ammo the best result; Usually 16 inch for centerfire and 24 inch for 22rimfire.

The general rule of thumb is you will lose 100fps per inch of barrel loss until you get to the pressure of the case upon ignition (In reality, the drop is not liner). If I remember correctly, the Agula rates their top speed .22 around 1700 fps. You said your pistol barrel is how long? I'm sure Agula tested their rounds in a rifle to give it the maximum velocity. I'd say a 26 inch, but I'll give them the benifit of the doubt of 22 inch. You can see how much of a drop in velocity you'll have with a pistol in comparison to a rifle.
Matter is bit more complex. Actually in rimfire bullet needs only about 10" long barrel to get max velocity, it will start to slow down after that point.
Best accuracy does not necessarily need one full revolution to bullet in a barrel, usually slower ammo will do just fine even barrel is shorten.

Biggest problem, i think, is that time period when bullet travels in barrel is about three times longer than in most centerfire rifles. We shooters are unstable creatures and can't hold a gun absolutely still that long, atleast I can't. Very tiny movement can cause quite good flier.
Using hi-velocity ammo will give us smaller time periods and we see that as a smaller groups. But it doesn't mean that hi-velocity ammo is more accurate, we just make less errors.

Pete
__________________
They trained me to kill other men, I healed one with my hands
ugly Finn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2007, 06:25 PM   #10
allamerican
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 449
Default

I had the same thing shoting supermax aguila out of a beretta 21. I had a backing but the holes were perfectly round and about .32 calibre.
allamerican is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.




Official Server Hosting Company: SERVERCITY.COM
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



The entire content of The Guns Network LLC, included but not limited to text, photographs, images, graphics, videos, audios, screen savers, trademarks, logos and service marks, is owned and are copyright © 1995 – 2009 All rights reserved. The Guns Network LLC is protected by copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws. No portions of The Guns Network LLC may be reproduced without the express written consent of The Guns Network LLC. The Opinions, Views and Comments expressed by the members of this forum and website are their own and do not necessarily state or reflect those of The Guns Network LLC or any of it's agents. The Guns Network LLC does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity or quality of these messages and opinions, and does not perform an independent investigation to verify their truth or accuracy. All posted messages are the sole responsibility of the person from which such post originated. If any posted message breaks our rules and guidelines, we have the right to delete such postings at any time. In no event will The Guns Network LLC be liable to you for any damages of any kind, including but not limited to, compensatory damages, lost profits, lost data, deleted postings or any form of special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages of any kind whether based on breach of contract or warranty, tort (including negligence), product liability or otherwise, even if The Guns Network LLC is informed in advance of the possibility of such damages.