Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: A little more on the Brietbart vid

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    356

    A little more on the Brietbart vid

    Shortly after Soledad O'Brien made an ass of herself in front of millions of viewers AND on tape by proving she could not explain CRT (Critical Race Theory) and tried to deny it was based on white supremacy, the Wikipedia entry was suddenly changed:

    http://minx.cc/?post=327345

    So if this Brietbart thing is such a non-bombshell or doesn't have some kind of potential to be damaging, why the big hoopla in the media? Aside from the fact it that it was hid in 2008, as admitted by the one gentleman in the video, why not just let it fade into obscurity?

    For those that didn't see the CNN video:

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cnn-...te-misreading/

    Interesting that we have a black woman on the panel (Amy Holmes from The Blaze) wondering why we didn't see the vid during the election and agreeing that it's not the medias job to hide facts or portions of them, all while O'Brien tries to drown her out and a white guy playing the race card against Joel Pollack. FYI: Joel Pollack is married to a black woman.

    Once again- Why is the media making so much something out of what they claim to be nothing?

    Another link. Thomas Sowell on Derek Bell and more links to videos of Derek Bell and his mindset:
    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...ll%20On%20Bell
    Last edited by Scootertrash; 03-10-2012 at 10:02 AM.

  2. #2
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Scootertrash View Post
    So if this Brietbart thing is such a non-bombshell or doesn't have some kind of potential to be damaging, why the big hoopla in the media? Aside from the fact it that it was hid in 2008, as admitted by the one gentleman in the video, why not just let it fade into obscurity?
    The guy who said it was "hid" was being facetious. Don't conservatives understand humor? The video was public domain as early back as 2006. If it was really so damning, why wouldn't have any of the RW talk radio hosts picked up on it like they did with Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers?

    Once again- Why is the media making so much something out of what they claim to be nothing?
    They aren't. The only ones trying to blow this video out of proportion and make a mountain out of a mole-hill are Breitbart's flock. Silly for the MSM to ask the question: what's the big deal?

    Breitbart was all about trying to "make" news, not report it.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  3. #3
    I think there is more to the Obama/D. Bell protesting at Harvard video. We haven't just haven't seen it yet.

    I did a thorough search of the MSNBC, ABCNEWS, and CBS websites. There was no mention of the video in their regular content.

    Given Breitbart's past MO, I suspec that they'll next show Derrick Bell saying something inflamatory, after being introduced by Obama. After a week or so of people arguing over what it all means, they show Obama's closing speech that backs-up Bell's speech.

    I hope the MSM takes it hook, line, and sinker and chokes on it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    17,742
    What more do we need to see that 0bama is bent on destroying America? If you haven't waken up to reality, meaning present day America, by now the koolaid is well into your system.

  5. #5
    Senior Member chiak47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Desert Rat
    Posts
    1,600
    Breitbart specifically said video's (plural) at CPAC...true story
    FBHO

  6. #6
    Senior Member American Rage's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,014
    Remember, this is just ONE of Obama's radical connections.

    And don't forget Michelle's racist screed of a Senior thesis her senior year of college.

  7. #7
    Senior Member stinker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Delivering supplies to the Alamo for round two.
    Posts
    3,084
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    They aren't. The only ones trying to blow this video out of proportion and make a mountain out of a mole-hill are Breitbart's flock. Silly for the MSM to ask the question: what's the big deal?
    Because Derrick Bell's writings were required reading for all his students in Chicago. You embrace the guy in public, sing his praises in front of a crowd and make every pupil you have read his stuff....the word sympathizer comes to mind. Since it's on video there's really no way to throw the guy under the bus and say "it was just some guy in the neighborhood" either. The real story here is not about president milhouse, it's about the media. Where were the reports about this if it was so public and how close did they actually look at his background? The poor little "not really the media" guy was able to find it so why could'nt the umpteen billion dollar networks do the same?
    History has a severe case of stuttering complicated by chronic hiccups.
    It always repeats itself and it never fails that something will go horribly wrong along the way.


    Direct democracy is a gang rape. Eight men vote to rape one woman and the woman has to accept it because the majority decided that it was ok. A constitutional republic on the other hand is eight men and one woman with a full mag. Think about it for a while until it hurts your head.

  8. #8
    Contributor 05/2012

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Clearwater, FL
    Posts
    1,370
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    The guy who said it was "hid" was being facetious. Don't conservatives understand humor?
    I know! It was hilarious! Must have been a conservative crowd there, though, because they didn't laugh either....?
    Wait. You don't think it was a LIBERAL crowd there that doesn't understand humour, do you? I DID hear a chuckle
    or two, but it sounded kinda like uneasiness..........

  9. #9
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    The guy who said it was "hid" was being facetious. Don't conservatives understand humor? The video was public domain as early back as 2006. If it was really so damning, why wouldn't have any of the RW talk radio hosts picked up on it like they did with Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers?

    Rush was being facetious too. Don't Liberals understand humor?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •