Shortly after Soledad O'Brien made an ass of herself in front of millions of viewers AND on tape by proving she could not explain CRT (Critical Race Theory) and tried to deny it was based on white supremacy, the Wikipedia entry was suddenly changed:
http://minx.cc/?post=327345
So if this Brietbart thing is such a non-bombshell or doesn't have some kind of potential to be damaging, why the big hoopla in the media? Aside from the fact it that it was hid in 2008, as admitted by the one gentleman in the video, why not just let it fade into obscurity?
For those that didn't see the CNN video:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cnn-...te-misreading/
Interesting that we have a black woman on the panel (Amy Holmes from The Blaze) wondering why we didn't see the vid during the election and agreeing that it's not the medias job to hide facts or portions of them, all while O'Brien tries to drown her out and a white guy playing the race card against Joel Pollack. FYI: Joel Pollack is married to a black woman.
Once again- Why is the media making so much something out of what they claim to be nothing?
Another link. Thomas Sowell on Derek Bell and more links to videos of Derek Bell and his mindset:
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...ll%20On%20Bell
Bookmarks