Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Almost 7 months to the day ... First SBR AR

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    529

    Almost 7 months to the day ... First SBR AR

    Form 1 sent in 7-22-12 ... received stamp 2-23-13



    The lower is a Colt 6940 and the upper is a Colt Diemaco that is in great shape but was an prison issue gun and has some handling & rack wear so it could stand a little refinishing.
    Last edited by kimberkid; 02-25-2013 at 09:57 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Nice, very nice! What's it chambered for, .223 or .300 Blackout?

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    829
    Congrats im jealous

  4. #4
    Senior Member filthy phil's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    @ the bar with ferd
    Posts
    718
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    Nice, very nice! What's it chambered for, .223 or .300 Blackout?
    With the pmag in it im guessing 556
    admit nothing
    deny everything
    make counter accusations

  5. #5
    Senior Member TEN-32's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,012
    Quote Originally Posted by filthy phil View Post
    With the pmag in it im guessing 556
    Same mag for either caliber.
    Face your fear, accept your war.

  6. #6
    Senior Member L1A1Rocker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TX Hill Country
    Posts
    3,421
    That's great! I sent off my Form 1 for my first SBR a couple of weeks ago. (and two more for silencers) I'm going to follow my normal procedure though. At the 3 month mark I file a complaint with my Congresscritter. So far, every time I've done that I had my forms in hand 3 weeks later. We'll see.

    Very cool history on that rifle, thanks for sharing. Any info on how it came to you?

  7. #7
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    Nice, very nice! What's it chambered for, .223 or .300 Blackout?
    Quote Originally Posted by filthy phil View Post
    With the pmag in it im guessing 556
    It's chambered for .223 ... I found it on Gunbroker as a used complete kit less receiver ... and I can keep all the full-auto parts as back-ups for my M16!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Partisan1983's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,753
    Very cool.

    You don't see many Diemaco parts anymore.
    Here's to pussy and gunpowder. One to live for, the other to die by.....Goddamn though, I do love the smell of 'em both !!!

  9. #9
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    529
    Quote Originally Posted by L1A1Rocker View Post
    That's great! I sent off my Form 1 for my first SBR a couple of weeks ago. (and two more for silencers) I'm going to follow my normal procedure though. At the 3 month mark I file a complaint with my Congresscritter. So far, every time I've done that I had my forms in hand 3 weeks later. We'll see.

    Very cool history on that rifle, thanks for sharing. Any info on how it came to you?
    What do you say to your "Congresscritter" ... I wouldn't mind speeding the process up by 3-4 months!

  10. #10
    Team GunsNet Silver 03/2014

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Northwestern Arizona
    Posts
    834
    That's a beauty! Congrats!

  11. #11
    Senior Member Partisan1983's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,753
    Quote Originally Posted by TEN-32 View Post
    Same mag for either caliber.
    I have been hearing a lot of guys have problems with Pmags using .300BLK.....
    Here's to pussy and gunpowder. One to live for, the other to die by.....Goddamn though, I do love the smell of 'em both !!!

  12. #12
    Senior Member L1A1Rocker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TX Hill Country
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by kimberkid View Post
    What do you say to your "Congresscritter" ... I wouldn't mind speeding the process up by 3-4 months!
    You fill out the standard constituant complaint form for your congresscritter. It's been a while but you typically tell him that you've been in contact with ATF and all they can tell you is "it's pending" (which is true). You ask him/her to please look into the matter to see if there is any reason why your particular form is held up and if so to please see that it get fixed. Or, if there is some sort of systemic problem at ATF that needs a congressman's attention to please do what ever he can within his power to help the situation along, as three months time is more than adiquite to simply process paperwork that requires no investigation (mine is on a trust).

    Then the congress critter's office will contact you and let you know that they are working on it. Then you'll get contacted again to let you know what they found and what's being done. One time the ATF actually called me before the Congressman's followup call and let me know that the forms were in the mail Sometimes there is not much they can do at the moment. I read that the ATF is really swamped right now with all the states becoming silencer friendly recently. BUT, that doesn't mean that the congressman can't get additional, or temporary, funding put in place to hire a few more processors until they get caught up. But if you don't let the congressmen know there is a problem, he won't know to try and fix the problem.

    Remember folks, your congresscritter is there as your representative to the Federal Bureaucracy. The biggest job for them (at least it supposed to be) is to see that the people in their district are not swallowed up, or stomped on by bureaucratic "red tape". If you have ANY problem with a Federal system or personnel, do not hesitate to contact your Rep - they work for you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan1983 View Post
    I have been hearing a lot of guys have problems with Pmags using .300BLK.....
    There are a number of 30 cal. bullet profiles that have clearance issues with the internal rib on the Pmag. Some have filed the rib down for clearance or just not used those profile bullets. I myself use the Orlite brand mags without any issue. I have not read of anyone having issues when using factory 300BLK ammo as it uses correct profile bullets.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Partisan1983's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,753
    Quote Originally Posted by L1A1Rocker View Post
    I have not read of anyone having issues when using factory 300BLK ammo as it uses correct profile bullets.

    Sorry. With how scarce .300BLK was before the panic, I assumed everyone reloaded for it, hence the assumption. My bad.
    Here's to pussy and gunpowder. One to live for, the other to die by.....Goddamn though, I do love the smell of 'em both !!!

  14. #14
    Senior Member L1A1Rocker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TX Hill Country
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Partisan1983 View Post
    Sorry. With how scarce .300BLK was before the panic, I assumed everyone reloaded for it, hence the assumption. My bad.
    No apologies needed. Notice is used the lawyer "weasel" words "I have not read. . ."? Just because I haven't read it, doesn't mean that someone somewhere didn't have a problem. Most of the re-loaders now know about the issue with standard 30 cal pills and P-mags. There have been efforts to get correct profile bullets out but they are expensive, and especially in today's climate, we're taking anything we can find.

  15. #15
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    9
    10th post

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •