DHS says100 miles from the border or less is non constitutional zone

[PROBASCO]

working on anew computer and having trouble sightings,but. DHS says you loose your 4th amendment rights if your within 100 miles of a border
f_ing spell check


BASICALLY, A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY HAS DECIDED TO MAKE ITS OWN RULES ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION. OBVIOUSLY, OUR VERSIONS ARE NOT SUITED FOR THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

http://simplefactsplainarguments.blo...ree-zones.html


DHS Establishes Constitution-Free Zones

[1 Patriot-of-many]

working on anew computer and having trouble sightings,but. DHS says you loose your 4th amendment rights if your within 100 miles of a border
f_ing spell check

You haven;t been drinking my frriend

[alismith]

So, does that mean you can own any type of firearm you want, like a full-auto rifle or sawed off shotgun? Since the Constitution doesn't apply there, then all the nation's laws don't apply either. Sounds like a "free zone" to me.

And, it you are a landowner there, does that mean you don't owe federal property taxes? And, you can shoot to kill and not have to worry about murder charges?

Wow.

[Kadmos]

8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(3) -Powers of immigration officers and employees

(a) Powers without warrant
Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—

(3) within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States, to board and search for aliens any vessel within the territorial waters of the United States and any railway car, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle, and within a distance of twenty-five miles from any such external boundary to have access to private lands, but not dwellings, for the purpose of patrolling the border to prevent the illegal entry of aliens into the United States;

The Attorney General's office has stated that the "reasonable distance" is 100 miles from a border.

The Supreme Court disagrees and says it is AT the border only

[jojo]

So, does that mean you can own any type of firearm you want, like a full-auto rifle or sawed off shotgun? Since the Constitution doesn't apply there, then all the nation's laws don't apply either. Sounds like a "free zone" to me.

And, it you are a landowner there, does that mean you don't owe federal property taxes? And, you can shoot to kill and not have to worry about murder charges?

Wow.

All valid arguments. They can't have it both ways.

[Ruskiegunlover]

um, link?

[Gunreference1]

I did some searching and found this story:

http://polymontana.com/hb-1505-is-th...istory-part-1/

HR 1505 - http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:hr1505:

Steve

[Kadmos]

um, link?

Mostly from crazies websites...

I know the ACLU isn't exactly thought highly of here, but at least it should be reliable enough to know there is some validity to the issue.

http://www.aclu.org/national-securit...tion-free-zone

Just remember, this isn't exactly a new development, this story goes back at least to 2006.

I think this maybe popping up on some of the right wing websites as a new story to try to add to the whole "Obama is planning to round us all up and murder us" thing that's been going on lately.

In reality the story actually likely goes back to the 1970's when they started putting in some immigration checkpoints more inland.