Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Anyone use the Command Arms XRS47 rail system?

  1. #1
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Pacific North West
    Posts
    7

    Anyone use the Command Arms XRS47 rail system?

    I am shopping around for a rail system to put on my AMD-65 build. I am interested in the Command Arms XRS47 system but I am not sure how good it is. Anyone have any experience with it? Please let me know any problems or caveats. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member stinker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Delivering supplies to the Alamo for round two.
    Posts
    3,084
    First time I've seen it, but...

    It's not the "first 5 rail system" out there.
    That's a slightly deceptive claim at best.

    http://www.themakogroup.com/product_p/vfr-ak.htm

    That's been around for quite some time now. They call it a "4 rail" but really it's basically the exact same thing when you look at it, though CA may be a bit more modular. MAKO is not 922r compliant (or at least it used to not be) either so depending on where CA is manufactured, and if you give a damn about compliance that could be a consideration.

    I personally don't like either. Too flimsy looking over the receiver. Accidentally drop the rifle one time and it takes a hit just the right way and that rail just looks like it's going to permanently bend/warp because it's floating mid air over the receiver cover. The design is just asking for it to not hold up.

    For that amount of money you could get a Krebs/Midwest forgrip and a TWS receiver rail and it'll be rock solid if it takes an impact.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •