Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Democrats love the 1st amendment!

  1. #1
    Team GunsNet Silver 04/2014 El Jefe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    . . . Fumbuc!
    Posts
    14,141

    Democrats love the 1st amendment!

    No, really. This is straight out of 30's era Germany.

    If two Democratic lawmakers have their way, Barack Obama’s Justice Department will submit a report for action against any Internet sites, broadcast, cable television or radio shows determined to be advocating or encouraging “violent acts.”

    This according to the text of a new bill from Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

    The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 “would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes,” stated a news release from Markey’s office.

    The one-page bill, reviewed by WND, calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to “analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.”

    The bill does not define which actions by broadcasters would be considered to have encouraged violence, seemingly leaving that open to interpretation.

    Once the report is compiled, the bill calls for “any recommendations” for action “consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States” that is determined to be an “appropriate and necessary” way to address the purported encouragement of violent acts.

    The Boston Herald took issue with the bill, calling it “frankly chilling” that Markey is seeking to “empower an obscure federal agency to begin scouring the Internet, TV and radio for speech it finds threatening.”

    “Perhaps he could crack a briefing book on the crisis in Ukraine rather than looking for his own extra-constitutional methods of punishing speech he finds unacceptable,” added the Herald editorial.

    With additional research by Joshua Klein

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/big-chill...mbmALMKiXex.99
    So whats next with these people? I mean their total disregard for our laws and traditions is amazing.
    Returns June 3rd.


  2. #2
    Team GunsNet Silver 04/2014 El Jefe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    . . . Fumbuc!
    Posts
    14,141
    Quote Originally Posted by 308 View Post
    An 18 yr old girl spreading her legs for the camera is protected free speech afforded in the 1st Amendment of the constitution. However, point out how our honorable elected officials and their unelected handlers are subverting traditional American values is hate speech. Those who speak such hateful words need to be punished most severely.
    Look at the feeding frenzy, witch hunt, Sterling the Clippers owner is enjoying right now. Al Tawana Brawley Sharpton is calling for the guy to have his team taken from him over a private conversation he had at home that was illegally taped.

    It should also be noted, for the record, that Sterling is a Democrat and Democrat money donor.

    *Breaking* TMZ now says that Sterling will be fined by the NBA 2.5 million and receive a lifetime ban. No idea yet what the ban actually means. This, to me, is incredible.
    Returns June 3rd.


  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    17,785
    Quote Originally Posted by 308 View Post
    An 18 yr old girl spreading her legs for the camera is protected free speech afforded in the 1st Amendment of the constitution. However, point out how our honorable elected officials and their unelected handlers are subverting traditional American values is hate speech. Those who speak such hateful words need to be punished most severely.








    See that's just it. This isn't a "hate crimes" bill so much as a "you can't say whatever we don't like" bill.
    "And how we burned in the camps later thinking, what would things have been like, if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain, whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?"

  4. #4
    Team GunsNet Silver 04/2014 El Jefe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    . . . Fumbuc!
    Posts
    14,141
    Quote Originally Posted by 5.56NATO View Post
    See that's just it. This isn't a "hate crimes" bill so much as a "you can't say whatever we don't like" bill.
    A thought police enabling bill.
    Returns June 3rd.


  5. #5
    Senior Member Kadmos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    7,682
    It's already a crime to advocate for, or incite, criminal activity, including violence.

    The courts have upheld that opinion over and over again.

    I really don't get why we would need another law to restate this.

  6. #6
    Team GunsNet Silver 04/2014 El Jefe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    . . . Fumbuc!
    Posts
    14,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Kadmos View Post
    It's already a crime to advocate for, or incite, criminal activity, including violence.

    The courts have upheld that opinion over and over again.

    I really don't get why we would need another law to restate this.


    There seems to be lots of things you don't get.
    Returns June 3rd.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •