Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Thread: 5.56 VS 7.62x39 for prepping/shtf

  1. #21
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Another thing I will add is that wound channel stuff does have a factor but the energy of a 7.62x39mm is going to have a greater effect on the nervous system, and with that force it is going to cause more tissue and blood to come out the exit wound and a greater loss of blood supply quickly. Where the 5.56 may go in and tear things up...it might not have the energy to stop the person initially.

    Here is an interesting article dealing with the disadvantages of the 5.56mm in Afghanistan.

    http://defensetech.org/2010/03/01/ta...alf-kilometer/

  2. #22
    Senior Member Silentkilla01's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Where ever they send me next
    Posts
    1,592
    image.jpg
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    Well if your SHTF enemy was hiding behind sealed 55 gallon drums...what would you rather have to penetrate through it? 5.56 or 7.62x39?
    That's simple. I have this for that!!! Lmao
    What's up my nigga's

  3. #23
    Senior Member Silentkilla01's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Where ever they send me next
    Posts
    1,592
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    Well if your SHTF enemy was hiding behind sealed 55 gallon drums...what would you rather have to penetrate through it? 5.56 or 7.62x39?
    It's seemed to work fine since the early 60's to destroy our enemies.... Don you not concur?
    What's up my nigga's

  4. #24
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Silentkilla01 View Post
    It's seemed to work fine since the early 60's to destroy our enemies.... Don you not concur?
    Oh I agree...I don't have anything personal against it.

  5. #25
    Senior Member JTHunter's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,076
    Quote Originally Posted by FunkyPertwee View Post
    How much penetration you want is a personal decision. I keep my AK mags loaded with HP rounds that have been proven to shred within 12 inches of flesh. I imagine they wouldn't penetrate the drums either, but my whole point for using them is so that dangerous shrapnel doesn't come flying out of the backside of a potential home invader, and to ensure that all of the round's energy is left in his torso.
    In my mags, I use "mixed" ammo. Out of every 10-shot stripper clip, 6 -7 rounds will be misurp HP, and 1-2 each FMJ and PSPs (pointed soft points), and they alternate in much the same way they did with tracers in military weapons.
    “I have little patience with people who take the Bill of Rights for granted. The Bill of Rights, contained in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, is every American’s guarantee of freedom.” - - President Harry S. Truman, “Years of Trial and Hope”

  6. #26
    Senior Member Phil125's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Pennsyltucky
    Posts
    622
    One other thing to consider with 7.62 is the quality of the AK or variant you are using. I've seen some bad AKs that couldn't hit the broad side of the barn.
    When some wild-eyed, eight-foot-tall maniac grabs your neck, taps the back of your favorite head up against the barroom wall, and he looks you crooked in the eye and he asks you if ya paid your dues, you just stare that big sucker right back in the eye, and you remember what ol' Jack Burton always says at a time like that: "Have ya paid your dues, Jack?" "Yessir, the check is in the mail." ----- Jack Burton 1986

  7. #27
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    But the 7.62x39 carries more energy.
    On paper. FMJ doesn't delivery it very effectively unless it tumbles and fragments. Past 300 meters the 5.56 will have more on paper energy than the x39 round. It will (if FMJ) resemble stabbing the person with an icepick at that range and beyond. The x39 may not hit the target at that distance unless; 1 luck occurs or 2 the rifle is one of the more accurate AK rifles.

    Back to my last posts ending statement again .... no 1 caliber can do all things all the time.

  8. #28
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southwest, Missouri
    Posts
    228
    "If you had to choose ONE of the two calibers for a shtf scenario in the US which would it be and why? "

    I like both calibers. But if I could only choose ONE, I would go with the 223/.556 simply because I don't think we are gonna see 7.62x39 imported like it has been. I think it will either be outlawed or it will be so hard to import that we can't afford it.

    Hope I'm wrong, but it's kinda that way already... Okay, Now that I've said my opinion. Back to it boys...

  9. #29
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,076
    Or, when shtf, going to buy some at your local gun shop just might not be as easy then. Whereas .223 will be used by A LOT of people, along with any military or law enforcement, along with the mags. So, resupply gets theoretically easier.
    "What sick, barbaric bastards.

    It's one thing to use terrorism to make a political statement, but the wanton mutilation and suffering of innocents? How does that forward your political goals? When done in the name of religion, how does that earn you brownie points with God?

    Fuck religious extremism. And especially fuck the "religion of peace." "

    So, lagcsocialist supports terrorism AS LONG AS ITS FOR POLITICAL ENDS....

  10. #30
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    395
    I prefer an AK simply because of very low maintenance "requirements". Any gun should be well maintained but in a true shtf you can't be sure of anything. Next where I live factors in and here in the mountains and foothills I am concerned with 4 legged as well as 2 legged.. I trust 30 caliber better than 22 caliber.. The AR is lighter and way more ergonomic but I will stick with an AK with where I live.

  11. #31
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    On paper. FMJ doesn't delivery it very effectively unless it tumbles and fragments. Past 300 meters the 5.56 will have more on paper energy than the x39 round. It will (if FMJ) resemble stabbing the person with an icepick at that range and beyond. The x39 may not hit the target at that distance unless; 1 luck occurs or 2 the rifle is one of the more accurate AK rifles.

    Back to my last posts ending statement again .... no 1 caliber can do all things all the time.
    But, it doesn't matter because in SHTF civilians would be better off not engaging anything, but trying to stay defensive and not drawing unwanted attention to themselves.

  12. #32
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163



    Just pick which one you like, buy it now and get squared away. An AK or an AR are plenty good enough.

    PSA has great deals going all the time now it seems, and the Serbian AKs from Century are great deal for a fighting rifle under $600.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  13. #33
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Within the heart of Hell. Michigan.
    Posts
    885
    Both, but 7.62x39 is nice for how cheap it kinda still is. Wound channel, ballistic manic data, just shoot the perp until it stops them. Isn't that about right? Adrenaline is some amazing stuff, only few rounds have a 1 hitter quitter. Most of what we may have is probably not the best anyways. Head shots are good, but under the stress of combat might not be easily achievable. Unless that's what you do. Whatever is accurate enough and cheap should do.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •