Wonder if this is happening here?

[5.56NATO]

UK HORRIFIC REVELATIONS: How fear of being called ‘racist’ prevented social workers from rescuing up to 1,400 mostly white girl children from sexual abuse and exploitation by Muslim sex ‘grooming’ gangs in just one town!

The sexual abuse of about 1,400 children at the hands of Pakistani Muslim men went unreported for 16 years because staff feared they would be seen as racist, a report said today. Children as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten, and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, the council commissioned review into child protection revealed. And shockingly, more than a third of the cases were already known to agencies.
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/0...-sex-grooming/

[El Jefe]

Remember when it was popular here to deny that the west, especially Europe, had an Islam problem? Ah, good times.

[Altarboy]

Anglos are on the way out. It was nice while it lasted.

[El Jefe]

Anglos are on the way out. It was nice while it lasted.

Self loathing is an ugly thing to watch and all leftys suffer from it. In short: they hate everything, regardless of how successful its been.

[Dan Morris]

PC and libspeak has been the worst enemy for years!
Dan

[alismith]

Anytime someone calls you, "racist," just reply, "no, realist."

[Kadmos]

Anglos are on the way out. It was nice while it lasted.

You mean as slave owners and human traffickers?

Basically you and Jeff, assuming I'm only reading into this as much as some people read into my posts...are totally fine with this sort of thing as long as it's done by white people?

That seems a bit racist, and just really immoral in general.

[El Jefe]

You mean as slave owners and human traffickers?

Basically you and Jeff, assuming I'm only reading into this as much as some people read into my posts...are totally fine with this sort of thing as long as it's done by white people?

That seems a bit racist, and just really immoral in general.

Was this the dumbest thing you could think to say? Why are you blowing this issue off? I mean besides the fact it makes leftys such as yourself look evil.

[Kadmos]

Was this the dumbest thing you could think to say? Why are you blowing this issue off? I mean besides the fact it makes leftys such as yourself look evil.

I'm not blowing it off, I think human trafficking is disgusting.

Apparently you only have a problem with it if it's non-white doing it.

That seems really messed up to me.

[Gunner1558]

Seems like a good place for this...






Go Dutch .. . . But Why Wait Until 2015?

The Netherlands, where six per cent of the

population is nowMuslim, is scrapping multiculturalism.

The Dutch government says it will abandon the

long-standing model of multiculturalism that has

encouraged Muslim immigrants to create a parallel

society within the Netherlands .

A new integration bill, which Dutch Interior

Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament

on June 16, reads:

"The government shares the social dissatisfaction

over the multicultural society model and plans

to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people".

In the new integration system, the values of the

Dutch society play a central role.




With this change, the government steps away

from the model of a multicultural society.

The letter continues: "A more obligatory integration

is justified because the government also

demands that from its own citizens."

It is necessary because otherwise the society

gradually grows apart and eventually no one

feels at home anymore in the Netherlands.

The new integration policy will place more

demands on immigrants.

For example, immigrants will be required to

learn the Dutch language, and the government

will take a tougher approach to immigrants

who ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special

subsidies for Muslim immigrants because,

according to Donner;


"It is not the government's job to integrate

immigrants." (How bloody true).

The government will introduce new legislation

that outlaws forced marriages and will also

impose tougher measures against Muslim

immigrants who lower their chances of

employment by the way they dress.

More specifically, the government imposed

a ban on face-covering, Islamic burqas as

of January 1, 2014.

Holland has done that whole liberal thing,

and realized - maybe too late - that creating

a nation of tribes, will kill the nation itself.




The future of Australia, the UK, USA and

Canada may well be read here.




READERS NOTE: Muslim immigrants

leave their countries of birth because of

civil and political unrest . ."CREATED BY

THE VERY NATURE OF THEIR CULTURE."




Countries like Holland, Canada, USA the

UK and Australia have an established way

of life that actually works, so why embrace

the unworkable?




If Muslims do not wish to accept another

culture, the answer is simple;


"STAY WHERE YOU ARE!!"




This gives a whole new meaning to the

term, 'Dutch Courage' ... Unfortunately

Australian, UK, USA and Canadian

politicians don't have the ... guts to

do the same. There's a whole lot of

truth here!!!!

ELECTIONS are COMING!!!!!




A Nation of Sheep, Breeds a Government of Wolves!









Let's Take a Stand!!!

Borders: Closed!

Language: English!

Culture: The Constitution, is the

Bill of Rights!


NO freebies to: Non-Citizens! We the

people are coming!!!

[raxar]

You mean as slave owners and human traffickers?

Basically you and Jeff, assuming I'm only reading into this as much as some people read into my posts...are totally fine with this sort of thing as long as it's done by white people?

That seems a bit racist, and just really immoral in general.

Ya know, I was going to call you a giant POS because of this blatant trolling, but then I remembered, there WAS someone on gunsnet who said child molestation wasn't so bad after all

Can anyone remember who said victims of sexual abuse didn't have any lasting effects?

[FunkyPertwee]

You mean as slave owners and human traffickers?

Basically you and Jeff, assuming I'm only reading into this as much as some people read into my posts...are totally fine with this sort of thing as long as it's done by white people?

That seems a bit racist, and just really immoral in general.

You are such an idiot.

The sentiment described in the post you quoted was along the lines of "political correctness is contributing to the growing weakness of white societies." NOT, "I wish white people were doing the sex trafficking instead of the muslims. Where's MY sex slaves?!?!".

[Kadmos]

Ya know, I was going to call you a giant POS because of this blatant trolling, but then I remembered, there WAS someone on gunsnet who said child molestation wasn't so bad after all

Can anyone remember who said victims of sexual abuse didn't have any lasting effects?

Oh good. You are halfway to the point I am trying to make.

You see, no one ever said that. Or anything all that close to that.

But so much more was read into what was said, that it now seems only proper to assume folks like Jefferson are all for whites owning sex slaves and being involved in human trafficking.

[Kadmos]

I wish white people were doing the sex trafficking instead of the muslims. Where's MY sex slaves?!?!.

Sorry, it's against the law. I really don't think it's very moral to want sex slaves




In all seriousness, sorry for dragging you into this one, I can't remember offhand if you were one of the people who drastically twisted what I was trying to say, or not. I don't think you were. I'm just trying to make a point. Obviously you don't want sex slaves...well any more than any male does...you know, in a fun "fantasy role play with your girl" kind of way.

[raxar]

Oh good. You are halfway to the point I am trying to make.

You see, no one ever said that. Or anything all that close to that.

But so much more was read into what was said, that it now seems only proper to assume folks like Jefferson are all for whites owning sex slaves and being involved in human trafficking.

Why must you cause such a deep divide in my soul?

OH THE PAIN!

WHAT FOUL CRUEL DECISION I MUST MAKE!

WHO AM I TO BELIEVE? KADMOS OR MY OWN LYING EYES?

[FunkyPertwee]

Sorry, it's against the law. I really don't think it's very moral to want sex slaves




In all seriousness, sorry for dragging you into this one, I can't remember offhand if you were one of the people who drastically twisted what I was trying to say, or not. I don't think you were. I'm just trying to make a point. Obviously you don't want sex slaves...well any more than any male does...you know, in a fun "fantasy role play with your girl" kind of way.

We can't read your sarcasm online. You have to try harder to express it, otherwise your posts merely serve to justify our opinion that you're an idiot.

I actually argued that you weren't a pedophile, however that doesn't change the fact that you tried to minimize the apparent harm that comes to sexually abused children from their abusers, and tried to instead focus on the harm caused by "over reaction" on the part of the parents. No matter how you try to spin it, this will come off as callous.

[FunkyPertwee]

Obviously you don't want sex slaves...well any more than any male does...you know, in a fun "fantasy role play with your girl" kind of way.

Yeah... fun, fantasy way... thats the ticket!

[Kadmos]

We can't read your sarcasm online. You have to try harder to express it, otherwise your posts merely serve to justify our opinion that you're an idiot.

I expected it would need to build up over a few posts to make the point

however that doesn't change the fact that you tried to minimize the apparent harm that comes to sexually abused children from their abusers, and tried to instead focus on the harm caused by "over reaction" on the part of the parents. No matter how you try to spin it, this will come off as callous.

Again, not the point I was trying to make,...... but I do in retrospect see how once it has now been twisted around for such a long period it's become virtually impossible to insure the narrowness of the point comes across.

[FunkyPertwee]

Again, not the point I was trying to make,...... but I do in retrospect see how once it has now been twisted around for such a long period it's become virtually impossible to insure the narrowness of the point comes across.

Nope. I read it myself. The first time and again during a rehash. And what a waste of time it was.

I came to my previously explained conclusion myself, not based upon any secondary interpretation by any member here. It may not be correct, but it certaintly isn't because of any bad guys twisting it up for me. But then again, I'm not an intellectual super-Jew with a super-IQ.

[Kadmos]

Nope. I read it myself. The first time and again during a rehash. And what a waste of time it was.

I came to my previously explained conclusion myself, not based upon any secondary interpretation by any member here. It may not be correct, but it certaintly isn't because of any bad guys twisting it up for me. But then again, I'm not an intellectual super-Jew with a super-IQ.

All I can say is if it came across that way, it was not my intent. Obviously the highest priority for child abuse is prevention. If that has failed, then it becomes the welfare of the child. What that may entail, I would think, varies from case to case. I think that's all that really needs to be said.