Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: U.S. Army Switching to Hollow Point Ammunition

  1. #1
    Team GunsNet Gold 07/2012 / Super Moderator Gunreference1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AZ USA
    Posts
    13,145

    Post U.S. Army Switching to Hollow Point Ammunition

    After today, it's all historical.

  2. #2
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Nice. I hope they use bonded Federal HST or Speer Gold Dot, if not develop something better.

    Now I'm finally interested in their modular handgun idea.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Wreckless driving on dirty back roads
    Posts
    8,959
    Wow in pc DC to thumb peoples noses shows balls.
    While no one ever listens to me,
    I am constantly being told to be quiet.

    In a world of snowflakes,
    be the heat..

  4. #4
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,299
    It's about time our military was allowed to fight our enemies using the same rules they use, none.

  5. #5
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Wreckless driving on dirty back roads
    Posts
    8,959
    Quote Originally Posted by imanaknut View Post
    It's about time our military was allowed to fight our enemies using the same rules they use, none.
    THIS!!
    While no one ever listens to me,
    I am constantly being told to be quiet.

    In a world of snowflakes,
    be the heat..

  6. #6
    Team Guns Network Silver 04/2015 mrkalashnikov's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TrumpLand
    Posts
    4,587
    Geneva Convention?
    Nietzsche: From life's school of war: what does not kill me makes me stronger.

  7. #7
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,299
    Does the convention cover strapping bomb laden vests to women and children?

    For that matter, did any middle eastern country sign any treaty or convention on how to wage a war yet be civil about it.

    Always thought it silly that we had to use FMJ while our Air Force dropped cluster bombs, napalm and that phosphorous stuff.

  8. #8
    Team Guns Network Silver 04/2015 mrkalashnikov's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TrumpLand
    Posts
    4,587
    Agreed, there has always been a double standard. I think the GC was conceived more for Western Europe (& the USA) than anywhere else. 3rd-World countries don't play by our rules...that figures into the whole 3rd-World, less-than-civilized dynamic I guess.
    Nietzsche: From life's school of war: what does not kill me makes me stronger.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    Quote Originally Posted by mrkalashnikov View Post
    Geneva Convention?
    whens the last time we actually fought a REAL standing army?




    We're the only ones that play by the rules.





    IMHO issue nothing but black talon/ranger sst or whatever theyre called now. Nobody will call the beretta M92 a pussy pistol then.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  10. #10
    Senior Member TEN-32's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,012
    Geneva convention was my first thought as well. As to the modular pistol, Sig is doing a lot with the concept.
    Face your fear, accept your war.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    or make a cast .356 Minie ball .. that will end shit quick.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  12. #12
    Team GunsNet Silver 03/2014 sevlex's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    4,463
    The Geneva convention does not address ammunition - that's the Hague convention. We are not signatories to that one, afaik.
    Telling the truth is treason in an empire of lies.

    WWG1WGA

    Nothing good ever comes from a pinched sphincter

  13. #13
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    should have kept a rifle big enough to shoot Dum-Dums from the start.


    speed kills varmints, but big fucking holes kill douchebags high on opium spraying AK's from the hip.



    issue a 300 ultramag assault rifle and 10mm handgun and were in business.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  14. #14
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Helen Keller View Post
    should have kept a rifle big enough to shoot Dum-Dums from the start.


    speed kills varmints, but big fucking holes kill douchebags high on opium spraying AK's from the hip.



    issue a 300 ultramag assault rifle and 10mm handgun and were in business.
    Never going to happen. 10 mm has to large of a grip and will have to much recoil for women and girly men. .300 Ultramag not the best choice, short barrel life. Heavy ammo, large recoil, muzzle blast, flash signature. Doesn't fit the theory that more bullets flying in the air equals more enemy killed or wounded. The military isn't ever coming off that doctrine. Only snipers are going to get anything bigger or special forces will have anything bigger than 5.56 IMO.
    Last edited by Schuetzenman; 07-09-2015 at 05:39 AM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    it's "too"



    I'd bet the 'futurists' back in the day never predicted we'd be up against high fucktards who are already willing to die for a child molester.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  16. #16
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    Never going to happen. 10 mm has to large of a grip and will have to much recoil for women and girly men. .300 Ultramag not the best choice, short barrel life. Heavy ammo, large recoil, muzzle blast, flash signature. Doesn't fit the theory that more bullets flying in the air equals more enemy killed or wounded. The military isn't every coming off that doctrine. Only snipers are going to get anything bigger or special forces will have anything bigger than 5.56 IMO.
    They should mix in .300 BLK the way the Russians put 7.62x39 back in the mix.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  17. #17
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Helen Keller View Post
    it's "too"



    I'd bet the 'futurists' back in the day never predicted we'd be up against high fucktards who are already willing to die for a child molester.
    Tooo Nazi!

  18. #18
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    791
    With no troops in foreign lands just who are they going to use this ammunition against?

  19. #19
    Site Admin & **Team Gunsnet Silver 12/2012** Richard Simmons's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,665
    Quote Originally Posted by shorthair View Post
    With no troops in foreign lands just who are they going to use this ammunition against?
    We have around 200,000 service members overseas at any given time with 300 or so of those being recently returned to Iraq and at least 10,000 still in Afghanistan.

    My questions are:

    Will the new HP ammo be NATO spec?
    Will existing stockpiles of ball ammo be stored, sold off or scrapped?
    Will HP be more or less effective when used against body armor/flak jackets?

    Not sure how many ISIS or Al Queda types wear body armor but the Soviets and Chinese do and it seems ball would be better able to penetrate then HP.
    Gunsnet member since 1999
    USN 1978-86
    BCCI Life Member #2068

    •" We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm. " George Orwell

  20. #20
    Team GunsNet Platinum 02/2014 Hatedbysheeple's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    714
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Simmons View Post
    My questions are:

    Will the new HP ammo be NATO spec?
    Will existing stockpiles of ball ammo be stored, sold off or scrapped?
    Will HP be more or less effective when used against body armor/flak jackets?

    Not sure how many ISIS or Al Queda types wear body armor but the Soviets and Chinese do and it seems ball would be better able to penetrate then HP.
    I would assume it will be NATO spec, but with 9mm is it even an issue? My issued sig is just an off the shelf p229, NSW uses off the shelf p226's and Army SF uses off the shelf glocks.

    Existing stockpiles would probably be used for range practice, if not most likely burned, it is easier paperwork wise to just destroy it.

    Soft body armor will stop handgun ammo both ball and HP so it doesn't really matter, and good plates will stop everything short of .50 BMG. You train failure to stop drills with your pistol for a reason.
    Last edited by Hatedbysheeple; 07-09-2015 at 08:23 AM.
    Initial Success or Total Failure

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •