Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 131

Thread: Any one know how to build a FAL?

  1. #61
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by rahatlakhoom View Post
    Whatever type of sight that comes on the Austrian stg 58
    I'm new to FAL's
    Umm, umm, umm! Lost track of this thread and there have been some questionable statements of fact bandied about. On your sight, it looks like a Para rifle's hooded rear sight and would not be typical for an STG58 rifle.
    Photo credit DS Arms. This is the typical metric rear sight including STG-58 Austrian rifles.

    Next on the topic of Metric vs. Inch pattern rifles. 95+ countries adopted the FAL as their main small arm at one time. Only the UK did Inch along with it's affiliated countries like Australia. Inch pattern magazines have a large front locking lug that is a milled piece that looks to be brazed to the mag body. The Metric magazine has a small rounded locking lug that is forged from the sheet metal of the magazine itself. Inch mags will NOT fit in a metric receiver, metric mags can fit in an Inch receiver. Metric mags are cheaper than Inch because there's about 90+ countries that made them vs. the UK influenced nations that used the FAL. Supply is up on metric magazines so the price is lower.

    Next can an L1A1 inch pattern rifle kit be built up on a Metric receiver. Yes it can, I have done it. The funky Inch stocks attach to the lower receiver which is the trigger housing under BATFE rulings. The latch up on the metric receiver was just fine on the Inch lower. Used a DSA type 1 on a guys Inch kit, used the breeching washer, worked out fine. Also have put an Inch barrel on a Metric rifle that had a shot out bore. Most difficulty I had was a new Israeli Heavy Barrel FAL barrel install. I used a needle file to chase the threads and reduce them just enough to screw in all the way so I could get the TDC timing right.

    Like I said way back 3 pages ago the FAL is an easy weapon to build, but it takes some special tooling to pull it off; barrel vice, receiver wrench, gauge pins. Only the AR15 is simpler and lower in cost for tooling to build it.
    Last edited by Schuetzenman; 01-23-2011 at 12:21 PM.

  2. #62
    Looks like I ended up with a para rear sight.
    Owner of the kit had already swapped out a bunch of things
    for US parts etc. I guess he must have wanted a para sight on it also.
    I can't complain. Next fal build I have my eyes set on one of those IMI
    heavy barrels. Sarco has a great furniture deal on this set up.
    We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
    George Orwell

  3. #63
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by rahatlakhoom View Post
    Looks like I ended up with a para rear sight. Owner of the kit had already swapped out a bunch of things for US parts etc. I guess he must have wanted a para sight on it also. I can't complain. Next fal build I have my eyes set on one of those IMI heavy barrels. Sarco has a great furniture deal on this set up.

    The Paratroop rear sight is hooded to survive being dropped out of a plane with the shooter, but it limits range on the weapon to about 350 meters. The standard sight slides up in 100 meter steps out to 600 meters. Just something you might want to think about given your full length barrel.

  4. #64
    Senior Member Penguin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Penguin Land
    Posts
    2,287
    Personally I kind of like the Para rear sights. The ones I really like though are the canadian C1 rear sights.
    Doobie Doobie Doo..

  5. #65
    Team Gunsnet SILVER 05/2012 deth502's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    Next can an L1A1 inch pattern rifle kit be built up on a Metric receiver. Yes it can, I have done it. .
    i wanted a sand cut bolt in mine (the only ones i know of are inch) and it wouldnt physically fit into my receiver. maybe i got a bad one :dunno:

  6. #66
    Senior Member Penguin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Penguin Land
    Posts
    2,287
    As far as I know the ones that had sand cuts would be the inch ones with the exception of the canadian ones. Also I belive the Para ones had sand cuts as well. So if an inch bolt carrier won't fit in your gun I would look for a Para bolt carrier. All the Para FAL's were metric if I am not mistaken.
    Doobie Doobie Doo..

  7. #67
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by deth502 View Post
    i wanted a sand cut bolt in mine (the only ones i know of are inch) and it wouldnt physically fit into my receiver. maybe i got a bad one :dunno:
    You must have as I've had my hands on 4 sand cut bolts that fit in DSA metric receivers. I had assumed they were L1A1 carriers, but the came in demilled kits that were out of Turkey. I think I might still have one in the workbench drawer.

  8. #68
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Penguin View Post
    As far as I know the ones that had sand cuts would be the inch ones with the exception of the canadian ones. Also I belive the Para ones had sand cuts as well. So if an inch bolt carrier won't fit in your gun I would look for a Para bolt carrier. All the Para FAL's were metric if I am not mistaken.
    No sandcuts in a standard Metric Para rifle carrier. Israeli's have a form of sand cuts in their carriers but you don't see the milled stripes up the side of the carrier body, just notches in the rails.

  9. #69
    Conributor 09/13 slamfire51's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    8,200
    Schuetzenman knows what he is talking about.
    He built my FAL (SPOOKY) on an Imbel receiver.
    Never had a problem with it. Great workmanship on his part.
    There's no problem an AK can't solve...........


    GUNSNET Member Since 2003
    CCW Permit
    03 FFL

  10. #70
    Team Gunsnet SILVER 05/2012 deth502's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    I think I might still have one in the workbench drawer.
    if you can find it, can you do me a favor? measure the rail thickness on it here



    that was the hold up on mine. if i got a screwed up one for some reason, ill have to start keeping an eye out for another sand cut one at the shows. at this point though, after i headspaced it already, id be worried if it would work with my bolt.

    thanks

  11. #71
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by deth502 View Post
    if you can find it, can you do me a favor? measure the rail thickness on it here



    that was the hold up on mine. if i got a screwed up one for some reason, ill have to start keeping an eye out for another sand cut one at the shows. at this point though, after i headspaced it already, id be worried if it would work with my bolt.

    thanks
    Found two of them. One that looks newer is micing with digital verniers about .116 to .117" and a more used carrier mics around .115" ish.

  12. #72
    Team Gunsnet SILVER 05/2012 deth502's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,581
    thanks. thats right where im at.

    i never measured the old one, it went in a trade, but if i had to guess, it was prob about .150". it was almost half again bigger than the slot in my receiver.

    so if i find one now, do you know if my metric bolt will fit in the inch carrier?

  13. #73
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by deth502 View Post
    thanks. thats right where im at.

    i never measured the old one, it went in a trade, but if i had to guess, it was prob about .150". it was almost half again bigger than the slot in my receiver.

    so if i find one now, do you know if my metric bolt will fit in the inch carrier?
    Should. I have a bolt taken off one rifle in one of the two sand cut carriers.

  14. #74
    Senior Member abpt1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southeast PA ,
    Posts
    2,996
    Quote Originally Posted by deth502 View Post
    i wanted a sand cut bolt in mine
    why?

  15. #75
    Team Gunsnet SILVER 05/2012 deth502's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,581
    Quote Originally Posted by abpt1 View Post
    why?
    just for the look


  16. #76
    Senior Member abpt1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southeast PA ,
    Posts
    2,996
    Quote Originally Posted by deth502 View Post
    just for the look

    yeah that does look much better ....

  17. #77
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035

    Talking

    No sand in my part of Georgia, just the red clay.

  18. #78
    Junior Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by rahatlakhoom View Post
    My first FAL.

    I did do a reweld.
    Metric front stub, Inch middle section, metric rear end.
    This is an Austrian STG58 kit.
    (why didn't you guys tell me the FAL beast is as heavy as a
    Garand?)

    I do have a semi-auto, US part compliant rifle.
    The safety-sear area on the receiver was welded solid.
    The safety-sear area on the ejector block was welded solid.

    Enjoy the pics, I have dumped 80 rounds of nice Yugo 7.62 x 51
    into this toy this morning without a hitch.





    - did you heat treat it after it was done?
    - how many rounds did you put through it?
    - how did you mill/smooth out the welds?
    - how did you get the charging handle grooves perfect?

  19. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by ak474ever View Post
    - did you heat treat it after it was done?
    - how many rounds did you put through it?
    - how did you mill/smooth out the welds?
    - how did you get the charging handle grooves perfect?
    No heat treating was done.
    I've put 120 rds through it so far.
    I did not use a mill. Carbide burrs, die grinder, 4" angle grinder, hand files, small dremel type grinding wheel to
    cut the bolt carrier channel and all the other small grooves.
    Alignment using attachments gets the process started.
    We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm.
    George Orwell

  20. #80
    Team Gunsnet SILVER 05/2012 deth502's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    3,581
    wow, that looks like one hell of a gap to fill in the back.

    how many different receivers is that? im guessing its gotta be at least 2 to get the pieces big enough after grinding clean.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •