Umm, umm, umm! Lost track of this thread and there have been some questionable statements of fact bandied about. On your sight, it looks like a Para rifle's hooded rear sight and would not be typical for an STG58 rifle.
Photo credit DS Arms. This is the typical metric rear sight including STG-58 Austrian rifles.
Next on the topic of Metric vs. Inch pattern rifles. 95+ countries adopted the FAL as their main small arm at one time. Only the UK did Inch along with it's affiliated countries like Australia. Inch pattern magazines have a large front locking lug that is a milled piece that looks to be brazed to the mag body. The Metric magazine has a small rounded locking lug that is forged from the sheet metal of the magazine itself. Inch mags will NOT fit in a metric receiver, metric mags can fit in an Inch receiver. Metric mags are cheaper than Inch because there's about 90+ countries that made them vs. the UK influenced nations that used the FAL. Supply is up on metric magazines so the price is lower.
Next can an L1A1 inch pattern rifle kit be built up on a Metric receiver. Yes it can, I have done it. The funky Inch stocks attach to the lower receiver which is the trigger housing under BATFE rulings. The latch up on the metric receiver was just fine on the Inch lower. Used a DSA type 1 on a guys Inch kit, used the breeching washer, worked out fine. Also have put an Inch barrel on a Metric rifle that had a shot out bore. Most difficulty I had was a new Israeli Heavy Barrel FAL barrel install. I used a needle file to chase the threads and reduce them just enough to screw in all the way so I could get the TDC timing right.
Like I said way back 3 pages ago the FAL is an easy weapon to build, but it takes some special tooling to pull it off; barrel vice, receiver wrench, gauge pins. Only the AR15 is simpler and lower in cost for tooling to build it.
Bookmarks