Firearms Freedom Act of 2015 !!!

[Partisan1983]

This is well past overdue...

http://bearingarms.com/time-firearms-freedom-act-2015/

[ltorlo64]

Now if we could get someone to actually offer this as a bill, or more correctly, turn it into a bill that could be voted on.

[Schuetzenman]

With O-scumbag in office if it passes he WILL veto it.

[L1A1Rocker]

With O-scumbag in office if it passes he WILL veto it.

I know The Won will not sign it. BUT, now is a great time to start a Buzz so that it may become a talking issue in the next campaign. It takes a while to get these kinds of things off the ground. Might as well start now.

Two things I'd add: Remove all SPORTING PURPOSE verbiage from current US Code!!!! And remove CLEO signoff from NFA forms.

[nfa1934]

I know The Won will not sign it. BUT, now is a great time to start a Buzz so that it may become a talking issue in the next campaign. It takes a while to get these kinds of things off the ground. Might as well start now.

Two things I'd add: Remove all SPORTING PURPOSE verbiage from current US Code!!!! And remove CLEO signoff from NFA forms.

And remove suppressors from the purview of the NFA entirely.

[L1A1Rocker]

And remove suppressors from the purview of the NFA entirely.

That's already on the list:

Removing suppressors from the National Firearms Act of 1934. What we call suppressors or silencers today are nothing more or than mufflers for guns, and with good reason: automobile mufflers and gun mufflers were both developed by the same man (Hiram Percy Maxim) at the same time. He invented these noise-reducing suppressors to cut down on the excessive noise of both internal combustion engines and the noise of gunfire. Just like cars with gasoline engines are by no mean silent and cars sound like cars even with a muffler in place, firearms with suppressors still sound like guns, just at a less-damaging volume. Some have made the argument that if they were created today, OSHA would mandate suppressors for firearms use to cut down on environmental noise and the American Medical Association would argue that they are needed to combat the hearing damage that still takes place when people wear ear protection. Ironically, suppressors are actively encouraged in many European countries where firearms themselves are tightly restricted, and using a suppressor to keep the noise from bothering others is seen to be the mark of a responsible citizen. Instead of requiring an onerous $200 tax stamp and months of delays in ATF processing, suppressors should be treated like firearms, or perhaps be declassified entirely. After all, do we have national registration for car mufflers? American President Teddy Roosevelt was a known fan of suppressed firearms and never had to jump through absurd legal hoops to purchase one. Neither should you.

[FunkyPertwee]

Why keep the NFA at all?

[Helen Keller]

Why keep the NFA at all?

$$$$$$$$$$$$

[nfa1934]

If only we had a document that prohibited the government from interfering with our right to own weapons in the first place...

[NAPOTS]

it would be nice if we could shove it down his throat with a veto overriding majority. Won't happen though, too many RINOs.

[L1A1Rocker]

Why keep the NFA at all?

One step at a time. The Gun Control Cultists have been taking our rights one step at a time for decades. The tide has turned and we are taking our rights back - one step at a time.

[raxar]

In case you guys need something to piss you off

http://www.sportsmanguncentre.co.uk/.../Moderators_1/

http://www.sportsmanguncentre.co.uk/...Second+Hand_2/

I've seen used .22 suppressors on there for as low as 10 or 15 pounds.

[Aggressive Perfector]

If only we had a document that prohibited the government from interfering with our right to own weapons in the first place...

I wonder why this article doesn't include the removal of SBS's from NFA and explicitly allow for foregrips on hand guns?