Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: .270 Winchester for SHTF? Sounds good.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790

    .270 Winchester for SHTF? Sounds good.

    I know most people think of this as a deer hunting round, but the lead free Commiefornian variation of this round seems to show some serious AP ability.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  2. #2
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Speed and hardness for the win. Remington makes a Bronze tipped .30 cal. bullet. I'd like to see that one in a .308 or .30-06 tried on that plate as well.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    I'm thinking a 30-06 in one of its hotter loads with this sort of ammo would be excellent, as last time I saw the true AP 30-06 it was rather pricey for being (probably) surplus.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  4. #4
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Yes real AP ball for the .30-06 is very expensive now. Once upon a time it wasn't so bad. One smart thing I did was buy a bunch of bulk pulled AP bullets before 2000. Less than a nickel each. Some day I may get around to loading a few.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    Very nice. Other than 30-06 and .270, I wonder what other rounds would work well for this task in this wonderful new Commiefornian ammo? 7.62x54R perhaps? I know it's just a hair milder than 30-06, but with something harder than a mild steel core I bet it could fuck some shit up. Standard 147 grain ball surplus rounds don't penetrate AR500 plates.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  6. #6
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    As with all armor it just takes more speed and a very pointy hard bullet or bullet with a very hard pointy core. .300 Magnums sporting some of those Remington bronze tipped rounds probably would do a lot toward getting through the hard plate. You realize most "civilian" peoples won't have any body armor at all so pretty much a .22 LR will get through what they would be wearing.

    Head shots don't need AP ammo.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    Fair point, but hard targets are also a threat.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  8. #8
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggressive Perfector View Post
    Fair point, but hard targets are also a threat.
    The ultimate hard target killer is .50 BMG unless you want to talk an RPG7. Taken the armor thing a notch up think Ferret vehicle. Your own mobile full head to toe body armor with turret and gun ports.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    Yes, but how many of us can afford a .50 BMG rifle and the ammo to feed it? Let alone carry it long distances. Cheap alternatives that can still punch holes in hard targets are good to have. I mean, surplus 7.62x54r are good enough to kill an engine (typically made from cast iron), but it doesn't perform quite so fantastically against modern hardened steel armor. As previously said about 30-06, so goes for .308/ NATO "equivalent" AP, not exactly a dime a dozen, not only in availability, but also in affordability.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  10. #10
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    How many can afford to get a .50 cal. rifle, if patient virtually anyone. Save up. Serbu Arms BFG50 is about $2400 and only weighs 23 lbs. If it is walking on 2 legs body armor or not there are plenty of vulnerable points to target. If it is on tracks or wheels and is armored, hide.

  11. #11
    Team GunsNet Silver 02/2014

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,663
    FWIW, that Rem Bronze Point was around in the late 40's/early 50's....it was accurate and deadly on 4 legged critters. Winchesters brain child was the OPE.....hollowpoint.
    Dan
    Last edited by Dan Morris; 11-06-2014 at 08:16 AM.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    Never seen it before. Might it just be coming back into popularity for lead free ammo? I'm just guessing here but I think it's supposed to help the copper spread better, but also seems to punch holes in armor.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  13. #13
    Senior Member NAPOTS's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    3,752
    The problem I'd have with .270 for shtf is that you are most likely going to be limited to your own supply. It's doubtful you will be able to police up any from someone who..doesn't need it anymore.

    .223 will probably be the most common

  14. #14
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    I wouldn't use .270 as a primary by any means (I highly doubt anyone would), Just noting that having one in the arsenal could certainly do some good. You're right though, once your personal stash is out, you're out and likely won't be able to replenish it easily.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  15. #15
    Forum Administrator Schuetzenman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East of Atlanta GA
    Posts
    15,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggressive Perfector View Post
    You're right though, once your personal stash is out, you're out and likely won't be able to replenish it easily.
    IMO it isn't just .270 vulnerable to personal stash depletion. Look what happened after Sandy Hook massacre, for a time nearly every caliber was unobtanium. To this day I still can't go into a store and expect to see a brick or .22 LR ammo from any manufacturer. In a real world wide SHTF event, (not just a 1 hour shoot em up) every round of anything would be gone in about 1 day if that from any place that sells / stocks ammo. What any of us have in any caliber is likely to be IT unless you take it off a dead person. The virtually instant run on gun shops, Walmarts, will sweep the shelves clean. I bet people will buy ammo they don't even have weapons for on speculation they might be able to use it as a bargaining chip / currency to get food or other ammo they might need.

  16. #16
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    IMO it isn't just .270 vulnerable to personal stash depletion. Look what happened after Sandy Hook massacre, for a time nearly every caliber was unobtanium. To this day I still can't go into a store and expect to see a brick or .22 LR ammo from any manufacturer. In a real world wide SHTF event, (not just a 1 hour shoot em up) every round of anything would be gone in about 1 day if that from any place that sells / stocks ammo. What any of us have in any caliber is likely to be IT unless you take it off a dead person. The virtually instant run on gun shops, Walmarts, will sweep the shelves clean. I bet people will buy ammo they don't even have weapons for on speculation they might be able to use it as a bargaining chip / currency to get food or other ammo they might need.
    +1

    I'd like to add that the idea that military/police compatibility will help you is foolish as well. They will be taking your weapons, not giving you ammo for them. And if you plan on taking ammo off of corpses, then there is no need to have a weapon in that caliber already because any person carrying ammunition will obviously have a weapon in that caliber as well.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  17. #17
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Schuetzenman View Post
    As with all armor it just takes more speed and a very pointy hard bullet or bullet with a very hard pointy core. .300 Magnums sporting some of those Remington bronze tipped rounds probably would do a lot toward getting through the hard plate. You realize most "civilian" peoples won't have any body armor at all so pretty much a .22 LR will get through what they would be wearing.

    Head shots don't need AP ammo.
    In the era of $75 dollar steel level 3 plates, I wouldn't count on it.

    The average ghetto thug won't have armor, but I would be suspicious of anybody who looks like they might know how to outfit themselves for a fight.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  18. #18
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    Schuetz, that'd be why any sane person stocks up on ammo ahead of time. Out of every run on ammo I make, x ammount i put aside for shooting, the other roughly 80% is for stashing (unless I just got a wild hair up my ass to buy a few mags worth just to shoot that day). Occasionally, I'll buy the biggest bulk pack I can afford just to add to the stash. It gets put up, and then I consider it to be gone untill that rainy day hits.

    Pertwee, the idea behind carrying weapons that use common LE & Military calibers isn't that hypothetical LEO and "military" bad guys will be handing anybody ammunition, so much as you'll be able to replenish ammo (even if only rarely) by scavenging from their corpses provided they don't make it a point to strip their dead of all valuable ammo, weapons, and such.
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

  19. #19
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Aggressive Perfector View Post
    Pertwee, the idea behind carrying weapons that use common LE & Military calibers isn't that hypothetical LEO and "military" bad guys will be handing anybody ammunition, so much as you'll be able to replenish ammo (even if only rarely) by scavenging from their corpses provided they don't make it a point to strip their dead of all valuable ammo, weapons, and such.
    I spoke to that scenario in my post. Any corpse with ammo will have a weapon to match it.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  20. #20
    Senior Member Aggressive Perfector's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,790
    I see your point, but even then, can you ever have too many rifles stashed?
    "Never take pity on a blind man. He may not be able to see, but he saves a fortune by getting the butt ugly hookers".

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •