Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: The late Christopher Hitchens destroys Bill Maher, and his audience!

  1. #1
    was_peacemaker
    Guest

    The late Christopher Hitchens destroys Bill Maher, and his audience!

    Not always a fan of the late Hitchens but he gave it to Bill Maher and his audience good here in fact he even defended G.W. Bush.


  2. #2
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    He was certainly opinionated in his time. I haven't read his memoirs (Hitch 22) but I do seem to recall an article summarizing it that said he gave somewhat of a death-bed confession saying he was mightily disappointed that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq, the rationale used to justify that bogus war.

    One thing's for sure: he never found Jesus before he died -- he was a militant atheist to his very grave.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  3. #3
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    He was certainly opinionated in his time. I haven't read his memoirs (Hitch 22) but I do seem to recall an article summarizing it that said he gave somewhat of a death-bed confession saying he was mightily disappointed that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq, the rationale used to justify that bogus war.

    One thing's for sure: he never found Jesus before he died -- he was a militant atheist to his very grave.
    Actually no he wasn't as nearly militant as you might think. He studied with theologians he argued with and even welcomed the prayers of people praying for him while he was dieing.

  4. #4
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    Actually no he wasn't as nearly militant as you might think. He studied with theologians he argued with and even welcomed the prayers of people praying for him while he was dieing.
    Oh? Next you'll be telling me he almost converted to SDA with his dying breath.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  5. #5
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    Oh? Next you'll be telling me he almost converted to SDA with his dying breath.

    What do the SDA have to do with this?

    http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/1...iend-hitchens/

  6. #6
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    I'm not sure how much stock you can put into the account of a rival debate partner, as Hitch wasn't exactly there to corroborate his story. Although he always regarded his opponents with respect and dignity.

    I do know many Christians like to think that all atheists repent on their death-beds, but many stay true to form to the very end.

    I just don't see Hitch caving in the end. Not on that issue, anyway.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  7. #7
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    I'm not sure how much stock you can put into the account of a rival debate partner, as Hitch wasn't exactly there to corroborate his story. Although he always regarded his opponents with respect and dignity.

    I do know many Christians like to think that all atheists repent on their death-beds, but many stay true to form to the very end.

    I just don't see Hitch caving in the end. Not on that issue, anyway.
    I wasn't implying that he did confess on his death bed but that he did have theologian friends...just like Dawkins has mellowed out a bit since the chief Rabbi of the UK him...I think you'll appreciate this. Its with Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks. Start watching @ 14:30 probably one of the best discussions between a theist and a non-theist.

    Last edited by was_peacemaker; 03-27-2014 at 03:55 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member L1A1Rocker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    TX Hill Country
    Posts
    3,421
    Bill seems to be a bit thin skinned when it comes back at him doesn't he.
    US Constitution: Article 1 Section 8 Paragraph 4

    The Congress shall have Power To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

  9. #9
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    I wasn't implying that he did confess on his death bed but that he did have theologian friends...just like Dawkins has mellowed out a bit since the chief Rabbi of the UK him...I think you'll appreciate this. Its with Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks. Start watching @ 14:30 probably one of the best discussions between a theist and a non-theist.
    That was an interesting interview. Judaism really is kind of unique though, in that it long has been more of a secular-minded religion, more open to science and inquiry versus strict adherence to tradition and faith. Quite a few Jewish scientists have won the Nobel Prize over the years... and like the rabbi said, the stories in the Old Testament: they didn't necessarily happen literally, but were meant more as parables describing why we should or shouldn't do different things (such as sacrificing young children to the gods like many pagans of the day back before them did.)

    I won't deny that the ideology behind the Big Three Abrahamic religions (Judaism-Christianity-Islam) had some marked improvements over the pagan rituals of the times prior, but they are still far from perfect systems for devising a modern system of ethics. Especially in today's changing world.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  10. #10
    Senior Member Pat Garrett's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Marshal's Office
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    I won't deny that the ideology behind the Big Three Abrahamic religions (Judaism-Christianity-Islam) had some marked improvements over the pagan rituals of the times prior, but they are still far from perfect systems for devising a modern system of ethics. Especially in today's changing world.
    And you would replace them with.........................WHAT???????
    If you don't like cops, the next time you need help, call a dope smoker.

  11. #11
    Contributor 02/2014 FunkyPertwee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Garrett View Post
    And you would replace them with.........................WHAT???????
    Communism and atheism.

    They'll make ethical decisions based upon whats best for the quality of life of the most number of people over the longest period of time. Quite a dangerous road to travel.
    "I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"

  12. #12
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Garrett View Post
    And you would replace them with.........................WHAT???????
    There is a rich tradition of the study of ethics in Western philosophy, dating clear back to Socrates' time and before. I really think general ethics classes ought to be taught to kids in public schools, especially as more and more parents these days shirk their responsibilities of teaching kids right at home. I just think it would help greatly fill the void that this country has left with religion having diminishing influence over the past couple decades. It might not prevent every future act of mass violence (like school shooting), but it certainly couldn't hurt.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  13. #13
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by L1A1Rocker View Post
    Bill seems to be a bit thin skinned when it comes back at him doesn't he.
    Bingo! Like the time he got flustered up on meet the press when he was talking to people who were actually educated on various topics.

  14. #14
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    There is a rich tradition of the study of ethics in Western philosophy, dating clear back to Socrates' time and before. I really think general ethics classes ought to be taught to kids in public schools, especially as more and more parents these days shirk their responsibilities of teaching kids right at home. I just think it would help greatly fill the void that this country has left with religion having diminishing influence over the past couple decades. It might not prevent every future act of mass violence (like school shooting), but it certainly couldn't hurt.
    Yeah, my issue with that is this. It could lead to more and more tools for a socialist teacher such as "The Republic" by Plato. If not taught with an open mind that book can be used as a pre-text for Marxist education in the public schools.

  15. #15
    Team GunsNet Silver 04/2014 El Jefe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    . . . Fumbuc!
    Posts
    14,141
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    There is a rich tradition of the study of ethics in Western philosophy, dating clear back to Socrates' time and before. I really think general ethics classes ought to be taught to kids in public schools, especially as more and more parents these days shirk their responsibilities of teaching kids right at home. I just think it would help greatly fill the void that this country has left with religion having diminishing influence over the past couple decades. It might not prevent every future act of mass violence (like school shooting), but it certainly couldn't hurt.
    Says the two time felon. Who has on multiple occasions attempted to defend Bill Ayers and Joe Stalin.

    You know nothing of ethics.
    Returns June 3rd.


  16. #16
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    A lot of professors in liberal arts studies have tried for years to slide Greek Philosophy under the rug as a replacement for religion. Though guys like St. Paul, and Maimonides harmonized them with religion, many today for whatever reason want to keep the two separate which is a shame. Kind of keeps the studies of both a bit more narrow.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Kadmos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by was_peacemaker View Post
    Yeah, my issue with that is this. It could lead to more and more tools for a socialist teacher such as "The Republic" by Plato. If not taught with an open mind that book can be used as a pre-text for Marxist education in the public schools.
    Just as the bible or Koran can be used to create some pretty nasty theocracies.

    Personally, I think "the golden rule" is a much better start than any of the worlds holy books.

    Religion can be a great thing, but it's not something I would care to base a society on, or even a legal system.

    And truthfully, in America, our legal system has tended to become about as distant from the religious books as we can get it, and for good reason.

  18. #18
    was_peacemaker
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Kadmos View Post
    Just as the bible or Koran can be used to create some pretty nasty theocracies.

    Personally, I think "the golden rule" is a much better start than any of the worlds holy books.

    Religion can be a great thing, but it's not something I would care to base a society on, or even a legal system.

    And truthfully, in America, our legal system has tended to become about as distant from the religious books as we can get it, and for good reason.
    Valid points. But at the same time I don't know if ethics could be taught without someone wanting to slide in "The Republic", which shouldn't be taught on anything lower than college level.

  19. #19
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
    Says the two time felon. Who has on multiple occasions attempted to defend Bill Ayers and Joe Stalin.
    Quote where I've ever defended Stalin. Maybe Ayers in passing, only by proxy of pointing out the Weather Underground's role in helping end the Vietnam War.

    You know nothing of ethics.
    I'm actually taking an Ethics class (Philosophy 202) at my community college right now.

    Want me to quote you some Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative?
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  20. #20
    Senior Member Kadmos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by LAGC View Post
    Want me to quote you some Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative?
    Not really.

    Well...maybe...what do you have?


    Although, if you've got to quote Kant, not that I've read it, but he does have one of the coolest book titles ever....






    The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •