Not always a fan of the late Hitchens but he gave it to Bill Maher and his audience good here in fact he even defended G.W. Bush.
Not always a fan of the late Hitchens but he gave it to Bill Maher and his audience good here in fact he even defended G.W. Bush.
He was certainly opinionated in his time. I haven't read his memoirs (Hitch 22) but I do seem to recall an article summarizing it that said he gave somewhat of a death-bed confession saying he was mightily disappointed that no weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq, the rationale used to justify that bogus war.
One thing's for sure: he never found Jesus before he died -- he was a militant atheist to his very grave.
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
What do the SDA have to do with this?
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/1...iend-hitchens/
I'm not sure how much stock you can put into the account of a rival debate partner, as Hitch wasn't exactly there to corroborate his story. Although he always regarded his opponents with respect and dignity.
I do know many Christians like to think that all atheists repent on their death-beds, but many stay true to form to the very end.
I just don't see Hitch caving in the end. Not on that issue, anyway.
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
I wasn't implying that he did confess on his death bed but that he did have theologian friends...just like Dawkins has mellowed out a bit since the chief Rabbi of the UK him...I think you'll appreciate this. Its with Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks. Start watching @ 14:30 probably one of the best discussions between a theist and a non-theist.
Last edited by was_peacemaker; 03-27-2014 at 03:55 AM.
Bill seems to be a bit thin skinned when it comes back at him doesn't he.
US Constitution: Article 1 Section 8 Paragraph 4
The Congress shall have Power To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization
That was an interesting interview. Judaism really is kind of unique though, in that it long has been more of a secular-minded religion, more open to science and inquiry versus strict adherence to tradition and faith. Quite a few Jewish scientists have won the Nobel Prize over the years... and like the rabbi said, the stories in the Old Testament: they didn't necessarily happen literally, but were meant more as parables describing why we should or shouldn't do different things (such as sacrificing young children to the gods like many pagans of the day back before them did.)
I won't deny that the ideology behind the Big Three Abrahamic religions (Judaism-Christianity-Islam) had some marked improvements over the pagan rituals of the times prior, but they are still far from perfect systems for devising a modern system of ethics. Especially in today's changing world.
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
"I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"
There is a rich tradition of the study of ethics in Western philosophy, dating clear back to Socrates' time and before. I really think general ethics classes ought to be taught to kids in public schools, especially as more and more parents these days shirk their responsibilities of teaching kids right at home. I just think it would help greatly fill the void that this country has left with religion having diminishing influence over the past couple decades. It might not prevent every future act of mass violence (like school shooting), but it certainly couldn't hurt.
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
A lot of professors in liberal arts studies have tried for years to slide Greek Philosophy under the rug as a replacement for religion. Though guys like St. Paul, and Maimonides harmonized them with religion, many today for whatever reason want to keep the two separate which is a shame. Kind of keeps the studies of both a bit more narrow.
Just as the bible or Koran can be used to create some pretty nasty theocracies.
Personally, I think "the golden rule" is a much better start than any of the worlds holy books.
Religion can be a great thing, but it's not something I would care to base a society on, or even a legal system.
And truthfully, in America, our legal system has tended to become about as distant from the religious books as we can get it, and for good reason.
Quote where I've ever defended Stalin. Maybe Ayers in passing, only by proxy of pointing out the Weather Underground's role in helping end the Vietnam War.
I'm actually taking an Ethics class (Philosophy 202) at my community college right now.You know nothing of ethics.
Want me to quote you some Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative?
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
Bookmarks