PDA

View Full Version : NY Times: Democrats Not Interested in Voters Who Work..



Warthogg
11-29-2011, 01:11 PM
The Dims are abandoning the white working class voter.


Wart


NY Times: Democrats Not Interested in Voters Who Work, Target Losers Instead

There is a fascinating story in the New York Times by Thomas Edsall:

“The Future of the Obama Coalition.” Let me read this first paragraph to you.

“The Future of the Obama Coalition — For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters.

But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.”

” They are going after the welfare state full-fledged. They are going after the entitlement mentality people in this country full-fledged. They’re not making any pretenses.

Here’s a pull quote. “A top priority of the less affluent wing of today’s left alliance is the strengthening of the safety net, including health care, food stamps, infant nutrition and unemployment compensation. These voters generally take the brunt of recessions and are most in need of government assistance to survive. According to recent data from the Department of Agriculture, 45.8 million people, nearly 15 percent of the population, depend on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to meet their needs for food.”
And yet these same people’s kids are fed three meals a day at school.

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/11/ny-times-democrats-not-interested-in-voters-who-work-target-losers-instead/


Here is a link to he full article.


November 27, 2011, 11:34 pm
The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL

For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic.

http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/the-future-of-the-obama-coalition/

old Grump
11-29-2011, 03:11 PM
Was just talking about this with my sister. He knows he can't get us so he just discards 25% of the electorate out of hand. You know, the conservative hard working gun shooting bible clutching heathens. Stand by because a lot of his base is as disgusted with him as he is with us. Next November is going to be a circus with lots of smoke and fire before it gets sorted out.

El Jefe
11-29-2011, 03:11 PM
Um, actually the Democrats abandoned the working voter over 50 years ago.

imanaknut
11-29-2011, 03:18 PM
The democrats exploited the anti-Christ idea of feeding a man versus teaching him to feed himself. If you keep a person beholden to you for his daily food, you have someone who will vote for you.

When you have a group that can persuade the elderly into believing that only they will continue your income, and the opposition will take it away, you have more beholden to you. I remember my inlaws voting democrat because they were told Bush would take away their social security. Time proved the lie, but sheep have no capacity for learning by word alone.

old Grump
11-29-2011, 03:29 PM
But the blue collar Democrats raised up by daddy's and grandparents who swear FDR saved them continued to blindly cast their ballot for them. Now they have gotten old and their company's automated or manufacturing shipped over seas has weakened that hold but the Republicans don't have the answer either. A pox on both parties. A pox on big business, it is the little business man and workers who keep them going and the people who buy from them that will save this country. Not Wall Street, Not Harvard, or Yale. Not the big unions or the Republicans or the Democrats.

mriddick
11-29-2011, 03:42 PM
I've been saying for some time now the D's are the party of the nonworking class, the R's the party of big business, no one is really pulling for the working guy anymore...

old Grump
11-29-2011, 06:07 PM
I've been saying for some time now the D's are the party of the nonworking class, the R's the party of big business, no one is really pulling for the working guy anymore...
Bingo, they are only for the people who fund their campaigns and make them rich after they get elected. These two year campaigns aren't designed to weed out the bad candidates its a dog and pony show to raise money. Period.

Warthogg
11-29-2011, 06:27 PM
the R's the party of big business




No just no right. Maybe at one time but certainly not in the last three elections.

The Rethuglicans are the party of 'small' business. The Dims are the party of big business and heavily backed Barry Obama.

(To a certain extent, big business buys access from both parties.)


Wart