Anybody else sick of the 3 Communists on this forum?

[1 Patriot-of-many]

One of them actually adds a few insightful observations but two of them are just total loser trolls, I can't believe I defended one(the criminal one). Luckily for them, we apparently love the 1rst amendment more than their ilk does.

[imanaknut]

They do have to admit they are lucky this site is as free as it is. There are many sites dealing with firearms that would ban you in a heartbeat if you got into some of the political and religious discussions we have here.

[NewbieAKguy]

They do have to admit they are lucky this site is as free as it is. There are many sites dealing with firearms that would ban you in a heartbeat if you got into some of the political and religious discussions we have here.True story.

[Charliebravo]

I don't post enough to know all three. I know we've got LAGC and Kadmos, who's the third?

[Warhog01]

Not that I don't appreciate others opinions but LAGC sucks big sweaty donkey balls kadmos is OK and the other is just a tool.

[Sergi762]

I don't post enough to know all three. I know we've got LAGC and Kadmos, who's the third?What? Joey? I dunno..Haven't seen him here in quite awhile.

[alismith]

It's always nice seeing how those with brain damage view the world. It makes one thankful to be sane.

[mrkalashnikov]

Well, I may be a communist but I also invented the Avtomat Kalashnikova. So I think I should get a pass.

[Dafapa]

One of them actually adds a few insightful observations but two of them are just total loser trolls, I can't believe I defended one(the criminal one). Luckily for them, we apparently love the 1rst amendment more than their ilk does.

I think there are a few of them that are actually bringing down the quality of content on this sight. There seem to be fewer threads about guns than threads filled with marxist trolling. Perhaps certain people could be required to maintain a 1:1 ratio of gun threads to trolling threads. We do seem to have a few people that NEVER post about guns, and only get involved with incendiary political discussions. This is not good for the forums.

[Ruskiegunlover]

In fairness, I will admit that I do not frequent the gun section of this forum. I DO believe that most everyone on here knows and understands that I AM in fact a gun owner, as I am on numerous other boards under the same name discussing firearms. I just get a much bigger community feel here because we discuss so many other topics on here. THATS what brings me here. I do probably need to post on the gun forums though, and apologize if that makes me come off as a simple troll on here. I do not feel that i am a troll on here.


And I always stand by banning people like Joey, as he is CLEARLY a marxist troll that seeks the destruction of people like us.

[Krupski]

I don't post enough to know all three. I know we've got LAGC and Kadmos, who's the third?

I have to disagree with you on this one. Kadmos may have some different opinions, but he's no way a "communist".

[LAGC]

Hey guys. I'm only here at everyone's leisure. If the Admins ever feel I'm detracting from the quality of the board, I'll dutifully stop posting.

I kind of like this board for its free speech aspect though. On other forums like Free Republic or Democratic Underground, if you don't tow the party line you get censored and banned. I like how we can have this free and open back-and-forth around these parts, clear across the political spectrum.

I enjoy reading all the gun-related sections of this forum, even if I don't have much to contribute, YET. Gunreference1's steady stream of news in the Gun Control forum is handy to be able to catch all the latest gun rights news in one place.

I do think true trolls that aren't even interested in guns (like Joey and his friends) should probably be shown the door though.

[Ruskiegunlover]

Time for a fair question: LAGC, DO YOU OWN ANY FIREARMS? If not YET, why not YET?

[Kadmos]

Anybody else sick of the 3 Communists on this forum?

You got an ignore button, quit bitching and click it.

Come to think on it, aren't you the one who made a big stink and put me on ignore a few months back?

Just for my own curiosities sake, does your whole worldview crumble of something when presented with a differing opinion and a logical argument to back it up?

Are you looking for a forum where you can post something and then have 12 people respond with "OMG +1...I like totally feel the same exact way"?

I imagine you can find yourself some forums like that if you choose.

Seriously though, if you have a problem with me, then

A. Actually argue the merits
B. Hit ignore
C. Go somewhere else

Problem solved.

Or I suppose you can troll me and call me a libtard, commie, or whatever

[Full Otto]

Time for a fair question: LAGC, DO YOU OWN ANY FIREARMS? If not YET, why not YET?
Not to be a buttinski but he's covered that on this board in the past.

Here's a little about it
http://www.gunsnet.net/showthread.php?13846-quot-Felons-finding-it-easy-to-regain-gun-rights-quot
.

[Charliebravo]

I have to disagree with you on this one. Kadmos may have some different opinions, but he's no way a "communist".

I know; however, I could imagine 1-Pat using a bit of hyperbole in describing all liberals as communists. Personally, I view Kadmos as being a little left-of-center, but I've got no problem with him whatsoever. LAGC OTOH can eat a bag of dicks and die in a fire. Still don't know who #3 is.

[Warthogg]

....I suppose you can troll me and call me a libtard, commie, or whatever

Well alright then. :holy-sheep::biggrin:


Wart

[Dafapa]

I know; however, I could imagine 1-Pat using a bit of hyperbole in describing all liberals as communists. Personally, I view Kadmos as being a little left-of-center, but I've got no problem with him whatsoever. LAGC OTOH can eat a bag of dicks and die in a fire. Still don't know who #3 is.

Liberals and communists base their deranged behavior off of the same underlying ideas. A liberal is a communist that hasn't gotten the chance to properly oppress the entirety of their civilization yet. Notice that the march to the left never stops for any of them. Liberals have given us tax brackets as high as 90% in this country at some points in time. What do you call it when the government gets *all* your money, and divides it up for the "greater good"?

Liberals and communists are two strains of the same virus. Just like there are 2 primary types of HIV. They do the same thing (destroy your immune system), but one just kills you much faster.

[Warthogg]

Liberals and communists base their deranged behavior off of the same underlying ideas. A liberal is a communist that hasn't gotten the chance to properly oppress the entirety of their civilization yet. Notice that the march to the left never stops for any of them. Liberals have given us tax brackets as high as 90% in this country at some points in time. What do you call it when the government gets *all* your money, and divides it up for the "greater good"?

Liberals and communists are two strains of the same virus.

Think the above is about right.


Wart

[btcave]

I'm not sick of their posts. Let em speak their mind like the rest of us. I'm man enough to have my beliefs being challenged. They seem to be man enough as well or they would have left by now.

[Warthogg]

I'm not sick of their posts. Let em speak their mind like the rest of us. I'm man enough to have my beliefs being challenged. They seem to be man enough as well or they would have left by now.

Yup.


Wart

[Bluntforce]

Kadmos is alright.

Is Printurd a commie, or just an idiot?

[slamfire51]

Hey guys. I'm only here at everyone's leisure. If the Admins ever feel I'm detracting from the quality of the board, I'll dutifully stop posting.

I kind of like this board for its free speech aspect though. On other forums like Free Republic or Democratic Underground, if you don't tow the party line you get censored and banned. I like how we can have this free and open back-and-forth around these parts, clear across the political spectrum.

I enjoy reading all the gun-related sections of this forum, even if I don't have much to contribute, YET. Gunreference1's steady stream of news in the Gun Control forum is handy to be able to catch all the latest gun rights news in one place.

I do think true trolls that aren't even interested in guns (like Joey and his friends) should probably be shown the door though.

I have a feeling you'll not be posting here much after the elections if Barry is shown the door.

On the gun subject, if you like guns as much as you say, being a felon and not able to posses a firearm would wrench my guts. In fact, if I were in you situation, I'd never log on to a gun board to avoid the pain.

[shorthair]

It's not possible for me to argue/debate with a Troll or a Liberal on this site or in person. Just not going to happen. It's not hard for me to keep track of the views of Liberals at all. Seeing it here on a gun board is nauseating to say the least.:barf:

[LAGC]

I have a feeling you'll not be posting here much after the elections if Barry is shown the door.

Well, if Mittens does somehow win, I probably will take a break from the boards for awhile.

I mean, at least with most Republicans you have the pro-gun issue to agree with. "A broken clock being right twice a day" and all that. But an anti-gun Republican has absolutely ZERO redeeming qualities whatsoever. It would truly be the worst of all possible worlds, from my perspective.

Not only would we probably be at war with Iran within a year, but there would be riots and unrest here at home as rich boy Romney guts the social safety net and sends millions into poverty and homelessness.

At that point, I think it would just be best to hunker down, focus on stocking up survival supplies for the retreat, and just wait for the fall of this once great nation.

[Warthogg]

Well, if Mittens does somehow win, I probably will take a break from the boards for awhile.



How will you tell the difference ??? Oh......one has a 'd' and the other an 'r'.


Wart

[LAGC]

How will you tell the difference ??? Oh......one has a 'd' and the other an 'r'.

Believe me, I'm not voting for either one of them!

But I think when it comes down to Obama vs. Mitt, its a case of would you prefer a disappointing friend remain in power or a mortal enemy take over?

I like to think Obama wouldn't let us get dragged into another expensive war with Iran, and wouldn't let poor people fall completely through the cracks. But who knows? He's already pretty much sold his soul to corporate interests, doesn't seem to have the balls to tax the rich to balance the budget. I don't see him suddenly growing a spine during his second term, when even when Democrats controlled Congress the first couple years of his first term he could barely get anything done.

Truth is, we're probably fucked either way.

[5.56NATO]

commanismses all up in here

[Warthogg]

Believe me, I'm not voting for either one of them!

But I think when it comes down to Obama vs. Mitt, its a case of would you prefer a disappointing friend remain in power or a mortal enemy take over?

I like to think Obama wouldn't let us get dragged into another expensive war with Iran, and wouldn't let poor people fall completely through the cracks. But who knows? He's already pretty much sold his soul to corporate interests, doesn't seem to have the balls to tax the rich to balance the budget. I don't see him suddenly growing a spine during his second term, when even when Democrats controlled Congress the first couple years of his first term he could barely get anything done.

Truth is, we're probably fucked either way.



Believe me, I'm not voting for either one of them!


Nor am I.



I like to think Obama wouldn't let us get dragged into another expensive war with Iran.....


Not sure. Barry met yesterday in public with AIPAC and undoubtedly met privately last night where selected AIPAC members told Barry to name his price and administered various threats. With the stick and money applied by AIPAC, Barry meets with BennyTheNut today.

Remember, Benny gonna attack someone.





...... wouldn't let poor people fall completely through the cracks.


Neither Barry nor Mittens will touch the present welfare system.



He's already pretty much sold his soul to corporate interests.......


True. I view Barry as simply an extension of Dubya. Both sold out BIG time to Wall Street, the bankers. insurance companies, unions......



....doesn't seem to have the balls to tax the rich to balance the budget.


The budget cannot be balanced by taxing the rich. However, by taxing the rich a poor economy can be made worse.



Truth is, we're probably fucked either way.


On that you may depend. We are decaying at an increasing rate........leaving only the question of 'when' and not 'if'.


Wart

[LAGC]

Not sure. Barry met yesterday in public with AIPAC and undoubtedly met privately last night where selected AIPAC members told Barry to name his price and administered various threats. With the stick and money applied by AIPAC, Barry meets with BennyTheNut today.

Remember, Benny gonna attack someone.

I heard that on the radio just a little while ago. I don't like the saber-rattling talk the president is engaging in at all.

Know this: if Obama does invade Iran before November, he will NOT be re-elected. He may gain some neo-con Republican support through his actions, but he will lose the entire anti-war left. There's already been too much patience over the Afghanistan withdrawal, Iran would simply be the last straw.

[Warthogg]

Quote Originally Posted by Warthogg
Not sure. Barry met yesterday in public with AIPAC and undoubtedly met privately last night where selected AIPAC members told Barry to name his price and administered various threats. With the stick and money applied by AIPAC, Barry meets with BennyTheNut today.

Remember, Benny gonna attack someone.



I heard that on the radio just a little while ago. I don't like the saber-rattling talk the president is engaging in at all.

Know this: if Obama does invade Iran before November, he will NOT be re-elected. He may gain some neo-con Republican support through his actions, but he will lose the entire anti-war left. There's already been too much patience over the Afghanistan withdrawal, Iran would simply be the last straw.

The anti-war left has no where to go as they would not vote for Gandhi if he ran under the 'R' banner.

Iran has the only population in the Middle East that both likes and admires the US*. An attack on Iran will drive the Iranian people back into the fold of the Mullahs they now despise. Israel is, of course, well aware of this fact and that will play into their decision. Israel's preference would be the entire Middle East hates us.

Israel is a very skillful player though they have certain advantages such as the fundamentalist Christians here and AIPAC to terrorize elected officials.

On-balance I expect Israel will attack Iran and the US will be fucked and participate. Even if we did not actually participate what country would believe we did not ? Approx none.


Wart


(*The Israelis consider us rubes and fools.)

[5.56NATO]

The shame of it all is we, the people of the United States, and they, the people of Iran, are held captive by our respective "leadership" and if only the "leadership" alone of each belligerent fought all wars the rest of us would be much better off.

[O.S.O.K.]

The shame of it all is we, the people of the United States, and they, the people of Iran, are held captive by our respective "leadership" and if only the "leadership" alone of each belligerent fought all wars the rest of us would be much better off.

With this system, Chuck Norris and Jackie Chan would get elected or appointed every time! :lol:

As to the OT of this thread, I personally don't care to see LAGC's stupid shit that he blathers. However, beyond being a "soft troll" he stays within the rules and every 30th thread or so, he actually makes a good point. Regardless, as long as I am not required to read his posts, I don't mind him posting. Ditto for other members that I don't agree with.

It's the "hard trolls" that I have a problem with - Joey being a perfect example. The board ownership made the rules and the mods are the board's REO's so to speak - and it seems to work just fine with that line drawn.

[Warthogg]

The shame of it all is we, the people of the United States, and they, the people of Iran, are held captive by our respective "leadership" and if only the "leadership" alone of each belligerent fought all wars the rest of us would be much better off.

We would have world peace by morning !!


Wart