Another Romney statement.

[imanaknut]

Why is it that people don't want to hear a politician speak not only what he feels, but what is possibly the truth?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-19637631

[Durangokid]

I think the polls show 49% want more handouts. Mitt needs to attack and keep on attacking.

[Penguin]

After reading the information at the link I would have to say Romney is right. I don't think the palastinians are truly interested in peace unless it means iseral has been wiped out. Once again I have to agree with him and it looks to me that for $50,000 you get to hear Romney tell it like it is instead of his usual flip floping trying to get both sides of the coin.

[Schuetzenman]

I can't decide if he's stupid or has more balls than I gave him credit for. He keeps saying reality and most of America seems to want everything candy coated to make them "Feel Good".

[El Jefe]

The paymasters of the Paleo's have no interest in peace with Israel. They won't rest until they've achieved the genocide they lust after.

[imanaknut]

Could it really be that like him or not, Romney is either very honest or is not afraid to speak his true feelings. Seems to be in direct opposition to the current liar-in-chief.

[El Jefe]

I think it's outrageous that he would tell the truth to the American people. How dare he!

[5.56NATO]

"I believe the people should have the right to bear arms, but I don’t believe that we have to have assault weapons as part of our personal arsenal." -Mitt Romney

“I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. That they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities,” -B.H. Obama.



And as for 0bamneycare:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/v30n1/cpr30n1-1.html

[Punk]

"I believe the people should have the right to bear arms, but I don’t believe that we have to have assault weapons as part of our personal arsenal." -Mitt Romney

“I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals. That they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities,” -B.H. Obama.



And as for 0bamneycare:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/v30n1/cpr30n1-1.html

If the point you're tying to make is that there is no difference between Obama and Romney then you couldn't be more wrong. Obama is certain destruction, we have a chance with Romney.

[LAGC]

If the point you're tying to make is that there is no difference between Obama and Romney then you couldn't be more wrong. Obama is certain destruction, we have a chance with Romney.

There certainly is no difference when it comes to gun rights. I am constantly amazed at how many gun-owners are willing to completely overlook Romney's terrible record on this issue, just because they agree with other parts of his platform. It's going to be fun watching everyone react when Romney back-stabs gun-owners during his first term. Of course, it won't be fun when the new AWB (with much more bite than bark this time) goes into effect.

[1 Patriot-of-many]

There certainly is no difference when it comes to gun rights. I am constantly amazed at how many gun-owners are willing to completely overlook Romney's terrible record on this issue, just because they agree with other parts of his platform. It's going to be fun watching everyone react when Romney back-stabs gun-owners during his first term. Of course, it won't be fun when the new AWB (with much more bite than bark this time) goes into effect.

For starters the House is owned by R's(who by the way blocked the renewal of the AWB, but never mind facts you fake democrap). The only Antigun legislation I see coming up is in the SENATE OWNED BY YOUR PARTY. Hopefully we take the Senate too and end the deliberate destruction of the US.

Question for you mr. objective....When carry reciprocity makes it to the presidents desk....WHO is more likely to sign it? Obama or Romney?

[LAGC]

Question for you mr. objective....When carry reciprocity makes it to the presidents desk....WHO is more likely to sign it? Obama or Romney?

I don't know. Probably neither, unless the application process is made more restrictive than most states. I could definitely see everyone having to go through extra training and qualifications in order to get a national permit good in all 50 states. But even Obummer signed into law carry in national parks, so not all hope is lost.

Like I said in another thread, I'm not so worried about this upcoming 113th Congress (2013-2015), its the 114th Congress (2015-2017) that scares the shit out of me.

[Penguin]

But even Obummer signed into law carry in national parks, so not all hope is lost.

Because it was hidden in a credit card bill.

[LAGC]

Because it was hidden in a credit card bill.

I don't see why National CCW Reciprocity couldn't be similarly tacked on to some other must-pass legislation.

Put the president in a tough spot, give him a bill that is so good, that he'd swallow the pro-gun rider versus vetoing the whole package.

[N/A]

It would seem, that once a member of this board steps forward and posts the facts, that people would read it and change their tune. It would seem that not all is as the media and uninformed would have us think. Untill copterdocter posted the link, I accepted, as others did, that Romney was somewhat anti-gun. Maybe a review of the facts are in order...as in go to his link and read...and maybe the truth can be descerned.





There certainly is no difference when it comes to gun rights. I am constantly amazed at how many gun-owners are willing to completely overlook Romney's terrible record on this issue, just because they agree with other parts of his platform. It's going to be fun watching everyone react when Romney back-stabs gun-owners during his first term. Of course, it won't be fun when the new AWB (with much more bite than bark this time) goes into effect.



The state insurance deal left the private insurers alone and added a low cost plan for people that couldn't afford the crazy Blue Cross Blue Shield type plans.
On Romney and an AWB...
http://www.goal.org/newspages/romney.html

Chapter 150 of the Acts of 2004: An Act Further Regulating Certain Weapons

This is a perfect example of don’t believe in titles. The bill was the greatest victory for gun owners since the passage of the gun control laws in 1998 (Chapter 180 of the Acts of 1998). It was a reform bill totally supported by GOAL. Press and media stories around the country got it completely wrong when claimed the bill was an extension of the “assault weapon” ban that had sunset at the federal level. They could not have been more wrong. Unfortunately for the Governor, someone had also wrongly briefed him about the bill. As a result the Lt. Governor and the Governor made statements at the bill signing ceremony that angered GOAL members. The following is what the bill actually did:




Legislation: During the Romney Administration, no anti-Second Amendment or anti-sportsmen legislation made its way to the Governor’s desk.

Governor Romney did sign five pro-Second Amendment/pro-sportsmen bills into law. His administration also worked with Gun Owners’ Action League and the Democratic leadership of the Massachusetts House and Senate to remove any anti-Second Amendment language from the Gang Violence bill passed in 2006. A summary of this legislation follows

[LAGC]

So Romney was lying when he said this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APPc_VrXysY

???

[N/A]

So Romney was lying when he said this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APPc_VrXysY

???
I'm saying you are so full of shit that nothing is believable coming from you. You neither take the time to investigate
or read anything. You google and only pick that which fits your marxist views. Go drink the Kool-aid. You've already said you didn't care who got electeded, so bugger off and swap prison stories with Diesel, as that seems to be the only thing you have factual knowledge of.

[LAGC]

The truth hurts doesn't it.

:coffee:

Your anti-gun hero you're pinning all your hopes on... what will he actually do once elected?

[N/A]

The truth hurts doesn't it.

:coffee:

Your anti-gun hero you're pinning all your hopes on... what will he actually do once elected? What will you do,...continue to be a whining, lazy useful idiot?

[NAPOTS]

There was an interview with Mitt Romney published in the September 2012 American Rifleman where he stated the following;

Cox: Would you support the re-imposition of a federal ban on semi automatic firearms incorrectly called "assault weapons"?

Romney: No. I do not support any additional laws to restrict the right to keep and bear arms.

[308]

The truth hurts doesn't it.

... what will he actually do once elected?
Why don't you tell us?
If one pays close attention to what you type there seems to be quite a bit of 'mind reading'....which by the way is a coping behavior produced by a wounded limbic system...something clearly a part of your nature based upon the totality of your profile and the bits and pieces you have revealed of your personal life over the years here. Poor boy...it can get better with a bit of therapy.


As far as the truth hurting? Sometimes it does, but the truth of the matter is no mind reading is required in 0bongo's case. He has proven himself a useless idiot.

Regarding Romney; it is not what a man says that counts, but what he does that matters and proves his character in the light of public scrutiny. While I disagree with LDS theology, "I" have yet to meet a Mormon that I could not trust to do the right thing when it comes down to it, therefore Romney gets my vote. I'd much rather have someone leading my country that speaks the cold hard facts and truth about things (pissing off the parasites while doing so) than some halfwit Kenyan who couldn't keep a small business in the black if his life depended on it...unless keeping it in the 'black' meant hiring a few of his panther pals.

[LAGC]

Regarding Romney; it is not what a man says that counts, but what he does that matters and proves his character in the light of public scrutiny. While I disagree with LDS theology, "I" have yet to meet a Mormon that I could not trust to do the right thing when it comes down to it, therefore Romney gets my vote. I'd much rather have someone leading my country that speaks the cold hard facts and truth about things (pissing off the parasites while doing so) than some halfwit Kenyan who couldn't keep a small business in the black if his life depended on it...unless keeping it in the 'black' meant hiring a few of his panther pals.

So you're basically admitting that you don't care how Mittens governs when it comes to gun rights, just so long as he sticks to a more-or-less conservative agenda overall?

I can understand not being a single-issue voter, but damn... to actually pull the lever for this guy when there are real pro-gun alternatives?

I never understood how the Jews went so willingly to the concentration camps... but it seems to be part of human nature, I guess.

SMH.

[308]

So you're basically admitting that you don't care how Mittens governs when it comes to gun rights, just so long as he sticks to a more-or-less conservative agenda overall?
I can understand not being a single-issue voter, but damn... to actually pull the lever for this guy when there are real pro-gun alternatives?
I never understood how the Jews went so willingly to the concentration camps... but it seems to be part of human nature, I guess.
SMH.
I've never understood how anyone can so willingly degrade themselves to the point where the only alternative in their failed decision making process is incarceration.
Perhaps if I could understand that, then I may be able to understand what all those worms are doing up there in that rabbit skull of yours....but it seems to be part of the liberal nature, I guess.

[Diesel]

If elected POTUS will Romney also be elected the next mormon bishop?

Not a question to be dismissed.

And lets not forget that the 2nd is not about hunting...it is about throwing tyrants out if they overstep...and bambam could bring us to that in the next four years. With a 1% base of 'true believers' and another 9% of followers he, bambam, can terrorize the rest of US to go along with his crap.

The time is now; The place is here...Fight or Die!

Diesel 88888888

Time to burn mohammed(s) everywhere: :terrorist:

[LAGC]

Another Romney statement:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=q4AqWqC6poM

[Diesel]

I've been rich and I've been poor...rich is better!

I'm thinking that obambam is having a Jimmy Carter moment right now...he's a 'secret' muslim and wouldn't think of actually doing anything to slow down the 'rising up' moment in islam.

I notice that we haven't heard of any attacks against Russian embassies but that is to be expected...after what happened to Grosney the simple minded head bangers know better than to attack a power that knows how to put islam in its place...in a scorched toilet!

It's time to start burning mohammeds(s) and end the 'apology' tour that obambam started.

Diesel 88888888

:terrorist:

[Warthogg]

He tells donors the Middle East will "remain an unsolved problem... and we kick the ball down the field".

Can anyone translate the above for me ??


Wart

[N/A]

If elected POTUS will Romney also be elected the next mormon bishop?

Not a question to be dismissed.



Actually, yes, it can be dismissed quite handily....assuming by "Bishop" you mean the next leader of the LDS Church.

[Warthogg]

I never understood how the Jews went so willingly to the concentration camps...

Hitler had already taken the guns.


Wart

The sabras (native born) of Israel also ask this question.

[N/A]

Hitler had already taken the guns.


Wart

The sabras (native born) of Israel also ask that question.

I used to read quite a lot when younger...about WW II, communism, et cetera. I remember being surprised when I read in a book that after the war, the Jews in Amerca looked down on the Jews of Europe for being enslaved so easily. They had very little compassion for them.

In today's world, I feel the same about America's Jewish people....that they so willing accept the socialism and try to find the middle of the road. Almost like, if they try to please everyone, they will not be hated by anyone. I don't understand it.

[Warthogg]

I used to read quite a lot when younger...about WW II, communism, et cetera. I remember being surprised when I read in a book that after the war, the Jews in Amerca looked down on the Jews of Europe for being enslaved so easily. They had very little compassion for them.

In today's world, I feel the same about America's Jewish people....that they so willing accept the socialism and try to find the middle of the road. Almost like, if they try to please everyone, they will not be hated by anyone. I don't understand it.

Even in Nazi Germany three of the top five communists were Jews. Certainly that didn't justify the holocaust but was another reason used for justification by the Nazis.

Here were Germany's choices as I see it:

Nazis with Hitler
Communists with Stalin

I have fairly relibale information indicating Solomon was called to provide guidance. However, his secretary said Solomon would be too busy to assist for about another 500 years. Not sure if this is true.....or not.

Just as a general comment, most of US Jews are left and anti gun. However, these same people would carry an M16 under one arm and an F-16 under the other when it comes to Israel. Disarm Americans.....further arm Israelis.

I do believe most of us constantly mistake Jews in America for Jews in Israel. NOT the same. Today more than 75% of Israel's Jews were born in Israel.



Wart