PDA

View Full Version : i THOUGHT oREGON WAS BAD, BUT YOU GUYS IN THAT KENNEDY STATE ARE GONNA GIT SHEET ON



PROBASCO
03-03-2013, 07:34 PM
Massachusetts Bill Allows Animal Rights Activists to Sue Sportsmen

Posted on March 1, 2013

Massachusetts State Senator Mark Montigny (D-New Bedford) recently introduced a bill that would allow private individuals to file a lawsuit for the “protection and humane treatment of animals.” This is of great concern for all sportsmen, farmers, and dog owners.

Animal cruelty is already a crime in Massachusetts just as it is across the country. Animal cruelty laws are enforced by experienced law enforcement officers, including local police forces and animal control officers, who are trained on what is and is not animal cruelty under the law and how to spot it.

Senate Bill 767 would end this proven system and instead give private citizens the ability to sue animal owners over what they perceive to be “animal cruelty” under the law.

“Under this bill, animal rights activists would be able to sue anyone – including sportsmen, farmers, and dog owners – whenever and wherever they think animal cruelty is being committed,” said Evan Heusinkveld, USSA’s Director of Government Affairs. “This could force sportsmen and women who have done nothing wrong to spend thousands of dollars to defend themselves against animal rights zealots looking to take them to court.”

For example, if an animal rights activist thinks common dog training practices—such as using a shock collar or tethering—are inhumane, they would now be able to sue the sporting dog owner or trainer claiming animal cruelty. Likewise, an activist that disapproves of certain farming practices could sue farmers for the practices they consider cruel. Even if a judge ultimately throws out the case, the animal’s owner will likely have had to spend a good deal of money and time fighting the bogus lawsuit.

“Enforcement of animal cruelty laws should be left in the hands of trained law enforcement officers and not be given to animal rights activists to harass law-abiding animal owners and private citizens,” said Heusinkveld.

Massachusetts sportsmen and dog owners and that PROBASCO guy, encourage you to contact their state senators and tell them to oppose this dangerous bill. Use USSA’s Legislative Action Center to find your state senator’s contact information.

imanaknut
03-03-2013, 07:47 PM
There seems to be no limit to how far people will go to force their will on others. A free country as long as you do as they say.

nitewatcherXX
03-03-2013, 08:23 PM
Just when you thought you heard it all... Theres this lady up here in Idaho complaining about people trapping wolves. She actually said, "when the trappers go to the trap where a wolf is trapped it wags it tail at you" Ive seen wolves alive in a trap. That fucker is NOT wagging its tail.

alismith
03-03-2013, 08:46 PM
This is the end result of allowing stupid people to breed. They beget stupid kids who grow up to be stupid adults.

PROBASCO
03-03-2013, 08:53 PM
shit and shit=shit

rci2950
03-04-2013, 03:05 PM
captive bolt guns are pretty cruel.

Hope you don't like beef or pork...

What about that thing that plucks the heads off the chickens?

tank_monkey
03-04-2013, 03:58 PM
A Bill was introduced ..... that's it. Yet ANOTHER stupid bill submitted by a DEMOCRAT.

Again, despite our flaws (I speak as a Republican), I always wonder at the morons who hate us more than the Democrats. At least you can coerce/convince a Republican politician to fight on your side. The Democrats have gone insane.

Anyway, it's only a proposed bill. You had better worry if it gets passed and signed. For the record, California has the most 'liberal' lawsuits laws in the nation (go figure). You can sue ANYONE for anything. This is the case because nearly all of the Democrat supermajority in our state are attorneys or were attorneys. They need a way to stay rich when they get out of office. The trick is, winning a stupid lawsuit is still harder.

5.56NATO
03-04-2013, 04:05 PM
shit and shit=shit2

corrected