PDA

View Full Version : AZ - Concealed weapons permit, training requirement ends Thursday



Gunreference1
07-24-2010, 04:03 AM
Concealed weapons permit, training requirement ends Thursday

Posted: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:58 am | Updated: 4:58 pm, Fri Jul 23, 2010.

Mike Sakal, Tribune | 6 comments

In less than a week, Arizona residents will be allowed to carry a gun in their pocket or purse without needing paperwork to do so.

Senate Bill 1108, which allows people to carry concealed guns with no permit or safety training, takes effect on July 29, the same day controversial immigration legislation is scheduled to begin enforcement. It makes Arizona the third state behind Alaska and Vermont, all supportive of gun rights, to enact a law that raises concerns for law enforcement.

“It’s disconcerting,” said Mesa Police Chief Frank Milstead. “The fact that anyone can walk around and carry a gun without training is disconcerting. We don’t let our police officers walk around with a gun without training. Some people will start shoving a gun down their pants and shoot themselves.”

SB 1108, sponsored by Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, was signed into law by Gov. Jan Brewer on April 16. People can carry guns without a permit, but still will not be allowed to take a gun into a bar or restaurant without one, as most such establishments prohibit them anyway.

The law also requires police officers to ask people they pull over or apprehend whether they have any weapons, and if the person says no and is carrying a weapon they still can be arrested for carrying a concealed weapon and providing false information to a law enforcement officer — a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and possibly jail time.

Bar owners throughout the East Valley already have a no-guns policy in place, despite the state law requiring permits for people who carry guns into bars or restaurants that serve alcohol.

Phil Marcus has been in the bar business for 15 years in Arizona and owns three bars, Mesa’s Hambone Sports Bar and Grill at 903 W. Main St., one in Phoenix and one in Surprise.

“My particular preference is, I don’t allow anyone in my bar with a gun unless you’re an on-duty police officer,” Marcus said. “I don’t think the law is going to create a bad or dangerous atmosphere. Criminals are going to do whatever they want, and honest people are going to abide by the law.”

At Groggy’s, 2207 W. Main St., Mesa, the no-gun policy also exists, but a bartender there believes people might start trying to bring in guns early on with the law going into effect. However, once the patrons realize they can’t get in with a gun, she believes things will remain the same.

“If people don’t know the law, they might think they’re allowed to bring in a gun, but they’re not,” said Bonnie Harness, who has been a waitress at Groggy’s for six years. “The law doesn’t bother me, and I don’t think it will make much of a difference, but we don’t want people in here with guns getting drunk.”

The Arizona Fraternal Order of Police, the state police union that oversees 38 different lodges and represents about 7,000 members, opposed the law. The group’s president says it was not needed in a state that already was lenient in issuing concealed weapons permits to gun owners with minimal fingerprint and background checks. The law also prohibits federal regulations to apply on firearms that were manufactured in Arizona, and blocks cities from applying their own laws against people carrying concealed weapons.

“The law now makes requirements and training to carry a gun in Arizona nonexistent,” said Sgt. John Ortolana, president of the Arizona Fraternal Order of Police. “I think the law was done to appease the gun lobby. I’m a firm believer in Second Amendment rights, but those rights come with responsibility. There will be people carrying firearms that have no clue about how to operate one, or the problems that can be caused by not knowing how to operate one. Some idiot is going to do something egregious, and there’s going to be an outcry of ‘How could this happen?’ ”

Meanwhile, gun sales remain steady at Glockmeister Glock-Gun Distributor Sales in Mesa, and more people have been coming in to look at smaller handguns, said owner Greg Wolff. The shop sells and distributes firearms to law enforcement officers as well as private owners.

“People are excited about the law and have been calling about it,” he said.

Wolff, a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, said the law “looks good on its face,” but he is concerned about people being able to carry guns without some kind of safety training. “A lot more people are going to carry guns,” he said. “It’s people who have had a gun sitting in a drawer for about 10 years who think they can just (start) carrying it around that I’m worried about.”

Although Arizona will continue its gun permit process through the Department of Public Safety, having a concealed permit will be optional. There were 158,170 active permits issued as of July 11 — up 3,891 since April 4, according to DPS figures.

Although people no longer are required to have permits if they are carrying a concealed weapon and are not required to take a gun safety course if they carry a gun, they still cannot carry a concealed gun across state lines, according to DPS spokesman Robert Bailey.

“Just because we pass a law in Arizona, doesn’t mean they recognize it everywhere else,” Bailey said. “People can still get permits if they want to take a concealed weapon across state lines or take a weapons course.”

There are 34 other states that provide reciprocity by allowing people from Arizona to carry a concealed weapon if they have a permit, according to Pearce.

The legislator said the law is constitutional and a “great bill” for law-abiding citizens. It also increases felonies for criminals carrying guns, Pearce said.

“I take no prisoners when it comes to peoples’ civil liberties and constitutional rights,” he said.

The Arizona Fraternal Order of Police’s Mesa Lodge No. 9 said like every other new law enacted, they will enforce it.

Asking people who are pulled over or apprehended if they are carrying any weapons is something officers already are doing and should be doing all the time anyway, said lodge president Bryan Soller.

“This won’t change the way we do business, but personally, I didn’t think the law was necessary,” Soller said. “We believe it’s a tool that’s been taken away from us. Before, if we asked someone if they were carrying a gun and they said yes, but didn’t have a permit, we could charge them with having a concealed weapon without a permit. Criminals and gang members are going to carry a gun anyway, and they’re the ones who wouldn’t tell you if they were.”

SB 1108 - http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1108s.pdf

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/cop_shop/article_e1b91aac-967b-11df-b468-001cc4c03286.html#user-comment-area

Steve

AKTexas
07-24-2010, 07:49 AM
Concealed weapons permit, training requirement ends Thursday

Posted: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:58 am | Updated: 4:58 pm, Fri Jul 23, 2010.

Mike Sakal, Tribune | 6 comments

In less than a week, Arizona residents will be allowed to carry a gun in their pocket or purse without needing paperwork to do so.

Senate Bill 1108, which allows people to carry concealed guns with no permit or safety training, takes effect on July 29, the same day controversial immigration legislation is scheduled to begin enforcement. It makes Arizona the third state behind Alaska and Vermont, all supportive of gun rights, to enact a law that raises concerns for law enforcement.

“It’s disconcerting,” said Mesa Police Chief Frank Milstead. “The fact that anyone can walk around and carry a gun without training is disconcerting. We don’t let our police officers walk around with a gun without training. Some people will start shoving a gun down their pants and shoot themselves.”

SB 1108, sponsored by Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, was signed into law by Gov. Jan Brewer on April 16. People can carry guns without a permit, but still will not be allowed to take a gun into a bar or restaurant without one, as most such establishments prohibit them anyway.

The law also requires police officers to ask people they pull over or apprehend whether they have any weapons, and if the person says no and is carrying a weapon they still can be arrested for carrying a concealed weapon and providing false information to a law enforcement officer — a misdemeanor punishable by a fine and possibly jail time.

Bar owners throughout the East Valley already have a no-guns policy in place, despite the state law requiring permits for people who carry guns into bars or restaurants that serve alcohol.

Phil Marcus has been in the bar business for 15 years in Arizona and owns three bars, Mesa’s Hambone Sports Bar and Grill at 903 W. Main St., one in Phoenix and one in Surprise.

“My particular preference is, I don’t allow anyone in my bar with a gun unless you’re an on-duty police officer,” Marcus said. “I don’t think the law is going to create a bad or dangerous atmosphere. Criminals are going to do whatever they want, and honest people are going to abide by the law.”

At Groggy’s, 2207 W. Main St., Mesa, the no-gun policy also exists, but a bartender there believes people might start trying to bring in guns early on with the law going into effect. However, once the patrons realize they can’t get in with a gun, she believes things will remain the same.

“If people don’t know the law, they might think they’re allowed to bring in a gun, but they’re not,” said Bonnie Harness, who has been a waitress at Groggy’s for six years. “The law doesn’t bother me, and I don’t think it will make much of a difference, but we don’t want people in here with guns getting drunk.”

The Arizona Fraternal Order of Police, the state police union that oversees 38 different lodges and represents about 7,000 members, opposed the law. The group’s president says it was not needed in a state that already was lenient in issuing concealed weapons permits to gun owners with minimal fingerprint and background checks. The law also prohibits federal regulations to apply on firearms that were manufactured in Arizona, and blocks cities from applying their own laws against people carrying concealed weapons.

“The law now makes requirements and training to carry a gun in Arizona nonexistent,” said Sgt. John Ortolana, president of the Arizona Fraternal Order of Police. “I think the law was done to appease the gun lobby. I’m a firm believer in Second Amendment rights, but those rights come with responsibility. There will be people carrying firearms that have no clue about how to operate one, or the problems that can be caused by not knowing how to operate one. Some idiot is going to do something egregious, and there’s going to be an outcry of ‘How could this happen?’ ”

Meanwhile, gun sales remain steady at Glockmeister Glock-Gun Distributor Sales in Mesa, and more people have been coming in to look at smaller handguns, said owner Greg Wolff. The shop sells and distributes firearms to law enforcement officers as well as private owners.

“People are excited about the law and have been calling about it,” he said.

Wolff, a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, said the law “looks good on its face,” but he is concerned about people being able to carry guns without some kind of safety training. “A lot more people are going to carry guns,” he said. “It’s people who have had a gun sitting in a drawer for about 10 years who think they can just (start) carrying it around that I’m worried about.”

Although Arizona will continue its gun permit process through the Department of Public Safety, having a concealed permit will be optional. There were 158,170 active permits issued as of July 11 — up 3,891 since April 4, according to DPS figures.

Although people no longer are required to have permits if they are carrying a concealed weapon and are not required to take a gun safety course if they carry a gun, they still cannot carry a concealed gun across state lines, according to DPS spokesman Robert Bailey.

“Just because we pass a law in Arizona, doesn’t mean they recognize it everywhere else,” Bailey said. “People can still get permits if they want to take a concealed weapon across state lines or take a weapons course.”

There are 34 other states that provide reciprocity by allowing people from Arizona to carry a concealed weapon if they have a permit, according to Pearce.

The legislator said the law is constitutional and a “great bill” for law-abiding citizens. It also increases felonies for criminals carrying guns, Pearce said.

“I take no prisoners when it comes to peoples’ civil liberties and constitutional rights,” he said.

The Arizona Fraternal Order of Police’s Mesa Lodge No. 9 said like every other new law enacted, they will enforce it.

Asking people who are pulled over or apprehended if they are carrying any weapons is something officers already are doing and should be doing all the time anyway, said lodge president Bryan Soller.

“This won’t change the way we do business, but personally, I didn’t think the law was necessary,” Soller said. “We believe it’s a tool that’s been taken away from us. Before, if we asked someone if they were carrying a gun and they said yes, but didn’t have a permit, we could charge them with having a concealed weapon without a permit. Criminals and gang members are going to carry a gun anyway, and they’re the ones who wouldn’t tell you if they were.”

SB 1108 - http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1108s.pdf

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/cop_shop/article_e1b91aac-967b-11df-b468-001cc4c03286.html#user-comment-area

Steve

This is great news!On one side I can see the LEO point of view,many times I have seen people that should not own guns.I respect the law and I respect those that enforce it.

The way I see this law beneficial is for the the honest guy,he won't be made a criminal by mistake.

There is nothing really to worry about the honest guy carrying a firearm,he won't go somewhere he is not suppose to anyway.But he could be the guy on the street one night passing a bar and a douche comes out high on liquid courage and starts some crap.

I need to move to AZ.

TakeFive
07-24-2010, 09:39 AM
“This won’t change the way we do business, but personally, I didn’t think the law was necessary,” Soller said. “We believe it’s a tool that’s been taken away from us. Before, if we asked someone if they were carrying a gun and they said yes, but didn’t have a permit, we could charge them with having a concealed weapon without a permit. Criminals and gang members are going to carry a gun anyway, and they’re the ones who wouldn’t tell you if they were.”

And so the point of having a law against carrying is what? How much more information does anyone need to be convinced that criminals don't obey the law and won't be deterred by it.

ubersoldate
07-24-2010, 11:16 AM
Mixed opinions......

Blacksmith
07-24-2010, 11:28 AM
“The law also prohibits federal regulations to apply on firearms that were manufactured in Arizona, and blocks cities from applying their own laws against people carrying concealed weapons.”

:happy:

AKTexas
07-24-2010, 11:29 AM
Mixed opinions......

What is your take on this?

ubersoldate
07-24-2010, 11:42 AM
Mixed.
I like the gov staying out of our manfufacturing of firearms, I like the state gov to stay out of our right to defend ourselves, but I do have to carry out there with some of these people, and wish they would at least have a chance to learn the laws.

AKTexas
07-24-2010, 11:50 AM
Mixed.
I like the gov staying out of our manfufacturing of firearms, I like the state gov to stay out of our right to defend ourselves, but I do have to carry out there with some of these people, and wish they would at least have a chance to learn the laws.

I agree with you about the education.Like driving a car you need to train.And we all know more deaths take place from poor drivers than guns.

Blacksmith
07-24-2010, 12:03 PM
Mixed.
I like the gov staying out of our manfufacturing of firearms, I like the state gov to stay out of our right to defend ourselves, but I do have to carry out there with some of these people, and wish they would at least have a chance to learn the laws.

I’m not going to drag this thread off topic but I will say, You would have better luck trying to convince me that the government needs to teach me how to breath.

AKTexas
07-24-2010, 04:53 PM
I’m not going to drag this thread off topic but I will say, You would have better luck trying to convince me that the government needs to teach me how to breath.

Assuming you grew up like me,a gun in my hand before I could walk?I was educated young and have been shooting now nearly 31 years.I have passed on the education to my kids and anyone I introduce to the sport.This knowledge is just like breathing to us.

Then there are guys I know that grew up with guns but were told they would get the snot beat out of them if they ever touched them and were never given a proper education.These same guys grow up and really not know jack about firearms other than which end goes boom.Those are the guys that need an education but not one that is mandated by law to own one but to carry I think yes.

Blacksmith
07-24-2010, 05:25 PM
Assuming you grew up like me,a gun in my hand before I could walk?I was educated young and have been shooting now nearly 31 years.I have passed on the education to my kids and anyone I introduce to the sport.This knowledge is just like breathing to us.

Then there are guys I know that grew up with guns but were told they would get snot beat out of them if they ever touched them and were never given a proper education.These same guys grow up and really not know jack about firearms other than which end goes boom.Those are the guys that need an education but not one that is mandated by law to own one but to carry I think yes.
The government should not be allowed to infringe on our rights in any way shape or form. What you are proposing is an infringement on our second amendment right. there is already laws that protect us from ignorant people. We sure the hell do not need more laws. especially laws that can be used to undermine the bill of rights.

AKTexas
07-24-2010, 05:32 PM
The government should not be allowed to infringe on our rights in any way shape or form. What you are proposing is an infringement on our second amendment right. there is already laws that protect us from ignorant people. We sure the hell do not need more laws. especially laws that can be used to undermine the bill of rights.

Your right,I did not think about it that way.

Any infringement is one step closer to total loss of our rights.

Gunreference1
10-26-2010, 09:42 AM
Arizona law pushing police to resell confiscated guns stirs concerns

by Sonu Munshi - Oct. 26, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

When Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1108 in April, it made headlines for allowing U.S. citizens in Arizona to carry concealed firearms without a permit. But some question a provision that pushes local police departments to resell confiscated weapons to authorized gun dealers.

The Peoria City Council last week passed a measure allowing police to continue their current practice of destroying most forfeited weapons.

Though the state legislation calls for the resale of weapons, officials in the northwest Valley city say SB 1108 allows for local bans. Peoria police fear the resale could put weapons into the wrong hands.

To read the rest of the story click the link below.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/2010/10/26/20101026arizona-gun-law.html

Steve