PDA

View Full Version : Kegan's ship is sinking...



O.S.O.K.
07-28-2010, 08:34 AM
This, from Grassfire Nation:

-------------

Yesterday, we completed the first round of hand delivered
letters to Senators regarding Elena Kagan -- more than
20,000 in all. Now evidence is mounting that Kagan not
only corrupted Supreme Court evidence but has been caught
in a lie before the Judiciary Committee.

Please see below for Grassfire's full report on what we
are calling "KaganGate".

Also, as of this morning (Tuesday), here is the latest
information our team as on how your two Senators have
positioned themselves regarding the Kagan vote:

Sen. Hutchison: Undeclared
Sen. Cornyn: No

If you want your personal letters to be included with our
next scheduled hand-delivery, we need to hear from you by
9am Thursday. Go here:

http://www.grassfire.net/r.asp?U=30300&CID=99&RID=21456702

Your friends at Grassfire Nation


+++++++++++++++
Grassfire Nation Special Report:
KaganGate
July 27, 2010
+++++++++++++++

We now know that Elena Kagan corrupted a scientific finding
that was presented before the Supreme Court. Her corruption
caused the Supreme Court to rely on faulty science and
extend the brutal practice of partial-birth abortion for
many years.

Kagan's corruption of evidence exposes her as a far-left
political activist whom former Surgeon General C. Everett
Koop says is unfit for the Supreme Court.

And we have the proof -- her HAND-WRITTEN memo! (Go here to see it):

http://www.grassfire.net/r.asp?U=30301&CID=99&RID=21456702

Now, evidence is mounting that Kagan made matters worse by
lying to the Judiciary Committee about her role in manipulating
scientific evidence.

During the hearings, Kagan did everything in her power to
avoid taking responsibility for corrupting ACOG's scientific
conclusion.

When Sen. Hatch directly asked Kagan, "Did you write that
memo?", Kagan first tried to avoid the question. When
pressed, Kagan barely acknowledged that "the document is
certainly in my handwriting," yet never admitted to being
the author of the statement.

But then she proceeded with a verbal cover-up that now
leaves her exposed. Kagan said:

"There was no way in which I would have or
could have intervened with ACOG... to get it
to change its medical views on the question."

This directly contradicts the fact that Kagan's own memo and
hand-written note prove that she did, in fact, "propose"
language that ACOG used... verbatim!

If senators would have the courage to consider the evidence,
they will quickly see all the elements of a full-fledged
"KaganGate" -- a conspiracy to manipulate scientific findings
combined with a cover-up under oath.

The only way Kagan will be held accountable is if grassroots
Americans rise up and demand that the fast-tracking of Elena
Kagan to the Supreme Court be stopped immediately.

Again, more than 20,000 letters from Grassfire Nation team
members have already been hand-delivered to the Senate.

The next scheduled hand-delivery will begin
Thursday afternoon. To be included in this
hand-delivery, we must hear from you by 9am
Thursday.

Click here for more and to schedule your letters
to be hand-delivered to your two senators and
other key senators:

http://www.grassfire.net/r.asp?U=30302&CID=99&RID=21456702

+ + Timeline of the Cover-Up

Here's the timeline, detailed by former deputy assistant
attorney general Shannen Coffin in the National Review (see
link at the end of this message):

1. Kagan, while working for Clinton, received a draft of
ACOG's scientific finding that was being prepared for
submission to the federal courts in a key partial-birth
abortion case.

2. ACOG's draft stated that ACOG "could identify no
circumstances under which [partial-birth abortion]. . .
would be the only option to save the life or preserve
the health of the woman."

3. Kagan noted in an internal memo that ACOG's finding "would
be a disaster" to Clinton's position to keep partial-birth
abortion legal.

4. So Kagan sent a memo to ACOG suggesting new language for
ACOG's scientific finding on partial-birth abortion.
Specifically, Kagan recommended ACOG say that partial-birth
abortion "may be the best or most appropriate procedure in
a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve
the health of a woman." Kagan's note totally warped the
meaning of ACOG's original statement.

5. This statement -- hand-written on the memo by Kagan --
was included word-for-word in ACOG's final submission to
the courts. The courts then relied upon ACOG's supposed
science, with no knowledge that a Clinton political
operative named Elena Kagan had corrupted the entire
process.

6. Because Elena Kagan corrupted evidence before the
Supreme Court, the horrendous partial-birth abortion
procedure remained legal for years -- and our legal
process all the way up to the Supreme Court was tarnished.

7. And just this month, Kagan attempted to cover up her role
in the evidence tampering conspiracy during the Judiciary
Committee hearings.

Again, if you want to get your own personal note to your two
senators, Grassfire Nation can help. Go here to schedule delivery:

http://www.grassfire.net/r.asp?U=30303&CID=99&RID=21456702

Thanks for taking a stand.
------------------------------

So, we sucessfully sink this commie's ship -- he'll just pull another one out of his big bag of commie friends... unfortunately...

CigarGuy
07-28-2010, 08:42 AM
Trying not to be cynical here, and G-d love 'em for trying, but does anyone think that ANY Dem will vote
against her? The ONLY question is how many Repubs she gets.

O.S.O.K.
07-28-2010, 09:10 AM
I think the "game" is to make her look so bad that even some bluedogs vote against her for fear of reprisal at the voting booth in less than 100 days...

Plus it gives Barry a black eye - or a blacker eye as the case may be... ;)

imanaknut
07-28-2010, 06:19 PM
Being a democrat shill, she will get a free pass on every count against her. Democrats can get away with anything, just ask Barney Frank, or those who knew Ted Kennedy, or... fill in the blank with your favorite law violating, or moral violating democrat.

NewbieAKguy
07-28-2010, 07:05 PM
Sounds good, but I'm not holding my breath.

old Grump
07-29-2010, 02:02 AM
Last nominee to get Borked was Robert Bork back in 1987. Since then the Senate has just been a rubber stamp. It would be historic if Kagan got Borked and I would love to see it but I'm afraid no matter how unqualified she is or how unfit, she has been chosen by the alien in chief and she will be confirmed. I hope I am wrong.

ltorlo64
07-29-2010, 06:01 AM
I have already communicated with my Senators on this and I will send them this new information. I expect her to be confirmed because our politicians take supporting their parties a being more important than fulfilling their oath. That does not allow me to not uphold my oath "to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies".

Besides, we are seeing cracks in their armor. This may prove to be sucessful.

DenaliPark
08-08-2010, 10:44 PM
So much for Kagans ship sinking, there was never any doubt that the commie would be confirmed, indeed, leftist political insurgent Lindsey Graham, who of course masquerades as a republican senator from South Carolina, justified his support of this women by stating, "elections have consequences!" :toke:

Phil O'Mel
08-08-2010, 10:49 PM
I'm afraid no matter how unqualified she is or how unfit, she has been chosen by the alien in chief and she will be confirmed. I hope I am wrong.

How exactly is she unqualified? Rehnquist and Warren had no judicial experience before they were nominated either, and weren't they nominated by Republican presidents?

old Grump
08-08-2010, 11:11 PM
How exactly is she unqualified? Rehnquist and Warren had no judicial experience before they were nominated either, and weren't they nominated by Republican presidents?

Ah geez, do I gotta write another book on her. Read her bio, look at the speeches she has made and her policy decisions as Dean of Harvard, her anti-1st and 2nd stance as White House Council for Clinton, Testimony she gave to the Senate as Solicitor General approving of and declaring censoring and banning pamphlets with political speech is constitutional. Look at her mothers role as an activist school teacher and her fathers radical activist law career. There is absolutley nothing in her back ground or work record that shows her to be fair and unbiased. It's all public record and it wont take you long to find it if you are interested. If you just want a pissing contest forget it, I ain't gonna play.