Does your dog spit or swallow?Originally Posted by Bluedog
Does your dog spit or swallow?
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
OMG!!
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
Freudian slip?
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
TITLE V--MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY
--Subtitle E--Military Justice and Legal Matters Generally
----`Sec. 920c. Art. 120c. Other sexual misconduct
(d) Repeal of Sodomy Article- Section 925 of such title (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is repealed.
It repeals Article 125 of the UCMJ which reads:
Article 125—Sodomy
Text.
“(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient
to complete the offense.
(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall by punished as a court-martial may direct.”
Elements.
(1) That the accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with a certain other person or with an animal. (Note: Add either or both of the following elements, if applicable)
(2) That the act was done with a child under the age of 16.
(3) That the act was done by force and without the consent of the other person.
Explanation.
It is unnatural carnal copulation for a person to take into that person’s mouth or anus the sexual organ of another person or of an animal; or to place that person’s sexual organ in the mouth or anus of another person or of an animal; or to have carnal copulation in any opening of the body, except the sexual parts, with another person; or to have carnal copulation with an animal.
Lesser included offenses.
(1) With a child under the age of 16.
(a) Article 125—forcible sodomy (and offenses included therein; see subparagraph (2) below)
(b) Article 134—indecent acts with a child under 16
(c) Article 80—attempts
(2) Forcible sodomy.
(a) Article 125—sodomy (and offenses included therein; see subparagraph (3) below)
(b) Article 134—assault with intent to commit sodomy
(c) Article 134—indecent assault
(d) Article 80—attempts.
(3) Sodomy.
(a) Article 134—indecent acts with another
(b) Article 80—attempts
Maximum punishment.
(1) By force and without consent. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for life without eligibility for parole.
(2) With a child who, at the time of the offense, has attained the age of 12 but is under the age of 16 years. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 20 years.
(3) With a child under the age of 12 years at the time of the offense. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for life without eligibility for parole.
(4) Other cases. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 5 years.
Gays in the military serving openly ... this is the sick shit you're going to get. I wondered how long it would take to authorize bu-fu for the homos.Just when you think your senators aren't doing anything......
Wart
Last edited by Schuetzenman; 12-04-2011 at 04:21 PM.
You have to wonder if the person who put this in the bill, was really trying to stick it to somebody?Freudian slip?
Well
it is very bad.
Thanks.
There is little evidence Congressional creatures are capable of thought.What are they thinking?
Yup. I hear there is a Top Secret manual denoting 10,000 ways to shaft your constituents.Maybe theres something they know that we don't.......
Wrong. Remember the congressional creatures crafted and passed this bill. Their ability to be "clueless is" virtually without limit........no one can be that clueless right?
Wart
In line with that thought, I was told that Ruger firearms is coming out with a US Congress commenmerative pistol. It's main attributes are that it won't work and you can't fire it.
It's the next logical step in the repeal of DADT, in that is it really surprising?
To me, legality of anal sex seems like a given. If vagina sex is legal how could butt sex not be? It doesn't have to be with a man you know....
The bestiality is a total shock to me. The act is illegal for civilians, unlike "sodomy", and is obviously animal abuse. If they don't have the right to randomly blast dogs with firearms, they shouldn't be able to fuck dogs either.
And once again, how are our troops supposed to enjoy butt sex when farting is illegal?
"I'm fucking furious, I'm violently angry, and I like it. If you don't know what that feels like then I feel bad for you"
Coming soon to a government office near you...
NAMBLA union reps.
History has a severe case of stuttering complicated by chronic hiccups.
It always repeats itself and it never fails that something will go horribly wrong along the way.
Direct democracy is a gang rape. Eight men vote to rape one woman and the woman has to accept it because the majority decided that it was ok. A constitutional republic on the other hand is eight men and one woman with a full mag. Think about it for a while until it hurts your head.
Heheheheh....prolly right.
Wart
SO NOW A CHILD UNDER 16 IS OK?????????????
What about a sheep under 16?
This simply CANNOT be real......
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
In the 1950's there was an Atlas booster (rocket) that sat on the pad for something like a year due to various technical problems. The people working on it used to jokingly refer to it as "The Public Servant" because "It doesn't work and you can't fire it".
True.
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
They should make one that fires to the rear.....
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
Pretty sure the sheep age of consent might be 3 years.
Wart
I defer to your knowledge, sir!
Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!
O ye of tiny faith !!
These are the same creatures who are running $15 trillion + in deficits and $61 trillion + in unfunded mandates.
Wart
Wart
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks