They cut down the number of candidates in this little quiz to see which presidential candidate you match up with the best but it was a decent little quiz even if I didn't like the limits of some of their choices.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/...ge?id=15177995
I came out very strong for Ron Paul, Perry and Gingrich tied a distant third. I mean they were way way back in the pack in comparison to the Ron Paul score. Kind of tickled my giggle.
Roman Catholic, Life Member of American Legion, VFW, Wisconsin Libertarian party, Wi-FORCE, WGO, NRA, JPFO, GOA, SAF and CCRKBA
"THE STATE THAT SEPARATES ITS SCHOLARS FROM IT WARRIORS WILL HAVE ITS THINKING DONE BY COWARDS AND ITS FIGHTING DONE BY FOOLS"
THUCYDIDES.
I wonder which stances they used for Mitt and Newt, the ones from a few years ago or the current ones?
1. Paul
2. Bachmann
3. Perry
I just think Paul's foriegn policy is terrible...
Mine were Romney, Newt and Huntsman. As I stated I'm not sure which stances they used for Mitt and Newt the new or the old ones. Regardless I wouldn't vote for either despite what ABC thinks or says. I guess Huntsman could possibly get my vote considering what little I know of him, but even he isn't my first choice at this point.
I'm not sure I'm so against his foreign policy (IMO much of it is bound to happen at some point) but his way of expressing is completely off from how he needs to sell it.Originally Posted by El Laton Caliente
Last edited by mriddick; 12-20-2011 at 07:02 PM.
Ron Paul and runners up Bachmann & Huntsman.
1. Ron Paul
2. Perry
3. Bachmann
I ain't saying nuthin.
1. Newt
2. Bachman
3. Perry
That sucks as I don't like Newt!
I can agree to greatly reduce overseas troops. I can agree to rein in CIA and others to not interfere in most cases. There are some things we just cannot ignore. Iran is one, their supreme leader wants to use nukes to bring the hidden Imam back. He is going to use nukes if he gets them and has said so.
1. Paul
2. Bachman
3. Perry
Mine was identical including Newt SUCKS !
Second time:
Ron Paul
Newt
Rick
Wart
Changing your stances to fit the candidate?
1) O'bummer
2) Huntsman
3) Romney
It would be nice if they had more candidates from the Left to choose from, these things usually match me with Ralph Nader on top.
"That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E
paul
bachmann
romney
No just some questions I was comfortable with more than one answer.Changing your stances to fit the candidate?
Wart
Gingrich
Bachmann
Huntsman
Gunsnet member since 1999
USN 1978-86
BCCI Life Member #2068
•" We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm. " George Orwell
Gingrich
Bachmann
Paul
Surprise Ron Paul was my first choice.
2. Newt Gingrich
3. Michele Bachmann
No way am I voting for Newt. I don't know a whole lot about Bachmann.
That is about what I think though I wouldn't vote for Huntsman either.As I stated I'm not sure which stances they used for Mitt and Newt the new or the old ones
I agree with you here. I think as far as Ron Paul forign policy goes I don't like it. How ever I belive it is bound to happen one way or the other. I also belive that it is the lesser of two evils we have to cut back significantly or there will be no US left at all when we go broke. his problem is expressing that. Every one just loves to call him an isolationist which he isn't. I have not heard him say not trade and lets just close our boarders like midevil Japan. What I hear is a not interventanalist policy of not playing the worlds police man while significantly cutting back our commitmints to save money.
Doobie Doobie Doo..
What is it about Huntsman you don't like? All I know of him is he's rather progun, probusiness, speaks Chinese (was Chinese ambassador) and anti federal right to abortion. None of those seem that bad. At this point I'd say he's my #2 pick out of a very weak field...
1) Perry
2) Paul
3) Romney
Paul and Perry were actually Tied and Romney was second.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-Nietzsche
"Accept the challenges, so that you may feel the exhilaration of victory."
-George S. Patton
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks