to get back on post...
Ron Paul is bad for defense and foreign policy because he sounds weak on defense and foreign policy, and sounding weak is worse then being weak at times.
What's wrong with if you do anything bad with your nukes we will vaporise your cities? Following your logic we will "have" to attack every country eventually.
What's wrong with if you do anything bad with your nukes we will vaporise your cities? Following your logic we will "have" to attack every country eventually.
I'm not sure saying RP is sounding weak expresses the opinion we need to invade every country. If anything I've steadfastly agreed with RP on the policy of us closing most (if not all bases) what I don't agree with is how he's expressing it (weakness).
Bookmarks