Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 63 of 63

Thread: Is Ron Paul Bad for Defense and Foreign Policy?

  1. #61
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    17,786
    Quote Originally Posted by mriddick View Post
    to get back on post...
    Ron Paul is bad for defense and foreign policy because he sounds weak on defense and foreign policy, and sounding weak is worse then being weak at times.
    What's wrong with if you do anything bad with your nukes we will vaporise your cities? Following your logic we will "have" to attack every country eventually.

  2. #62
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Mesa, AZ
    Posts
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by 5.56NATO View Post
    With Iran it's a bit different. China and Russia may take part in any actions over Iran. That would complicate things immensely.
    don't forget to throw in Pakistan and India as well.
    Last edited by smittylite; 01-06-2012 at 12:11 PM.

  3. #63
    Senior Member mriddick's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,804
    Quote Originally Posted by 5.56NATO View Post
    What's wrong with if you do anything bad with your nukes we will vaporise your cities? Following your logic we will "have" to attack every country eventually.
    I'm not sure saying RP is sounding weak expresses the opinion we need to invade every country. If anything I've steadfastly agreed with RP on the policy of us closing most (if not all bases) what I don't agree with is how he's expressing it (weakness).

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •