Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: a better look at our new "detention" laws

  1. #1
    Senior Member PROBASCO's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    PACIFIC NORTHWEST
    Posts
    1,622

    a better look at our new "detention" laws

    discussed last year prior to its subsequent enactment. Anyone who says this is constitutional has not read the 4th or 5th amendments to our constitution.
    amendments: 4th> "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. 5th>No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.



    Last edited by PROBASCO; 01-18-2012 at 12:09 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    harms way
    Posts
    17,742
    I wonder if the mil is going to do something about this treason or side with it?

  3. #3
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,280
    There has been a history lately of people taking an oath to uphold the constitution as part of their taking a job, and then stepping all over that document as if it doesn't exist.

    I truly feel sorry for our military if they were put in a position of either following the orders of the "Commander in Chief" or maintaining their vows to uphold the constitution. A really horrible situation to put someone into.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •