Rev. Manning Is Predicting Civil War And Worse....

[American Rage]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVmWuCyT034

Note: he claims that Obamao is a muslim and was illegally elected.

[PROBASCO]

with all due respect, I have been preaching that for 3 years

[American Rage]

with all due respect, I have been preaching that for 3 years

Along with millions of others

[Mark Ducati]

I agree, I can see another civil was in this country... however, I don't know if that will occur in 100 years or 500 years.

The problem is, you'll have a bunch of civilians with AR's and AK's going up against the current military with far more sophisticated weapons.

I don't see how any civilian army could go against a modern US one? The only thing we'd have available are domestic acts of terrorism... strike and run.

However, if half of the military defected, that'd be a page turner.

[NAPOTS]

I don't know that's all it took to drive us out of Iraq.

Iran would probably support any opposition here too just to be dicks.

[Richard Simmons]

I don't know that's all it took to drive us out of Iraq.

Iran would probably support any opposition here too just to be dicks.

The problem is that in a Civil War here one side or the other can't be "driven out" they are both fighting on their own soil. If we were to have some type of civil war I doubt it would be as clearly defined by some modern Mason Dixon line as the last one. Every town in every state, at least in the largest metro areas would be a potential battle ground.

[mriddick]

I'm one who believes there won't be a civil war, our ills are not a regional issue, it's one of philosophy that knows no borders. However that type of division might work for isolated spots of ethnic cleansing but nothing on a grand scale IMO.

IMO the mostly likely scenario is one where the gov't simply can’t pay for as much as it has and people will have to make due more on their own. I suspect many will be too busy trying to scrape by just living to go to war. IMO it's much more likely we revert back to the way things were in the early part of the 20th century, some rich, many very poor.

[O.S.O.K.]

I also don't see civil war - especially one in which the military does the bidding of a rogue obummer. No way, no how.

If he were to try and declare martial law, he would get a note back from the JCS to the effect of "no thank you".

What I do see is such a level of economic depression that riots break out in those areas most heavily populated with government dependents and I'm not talking about the retirement communities.

As mriddick says, when the govt loses the ability to provide the free shit, that will be the spark that ignites the "multicultural urban centers" to use the dimocrap-speak.

[Nashorn]

I agree, I can see another civil was in this country... however, I don't know if that will occur in 100 years or 500 years.

The problem is, you'll have a bunch of civilians with AR's and AK's going up against the current military with far more sophisticated weapons.

I don't see how any civilian army could go against a modern US one? The only thing we'd have available are domestic acts of terrorism... strike and run.

However, if half of the military defected, that'd be a page turner.

The Viet Cong did it quite well to several different nations over the last century. They used their weapons to kill the enemy and get better weapons. They weren't even half as well armed as some citizens in this country. There are alot of pissed off vets out there and I dont just mean the guys coming back from Iraq that still remember how to use the weapons they were trained to fight with. Can anyone say Ma Duece or 4Duece or Mr. M-60?

[TomO]

What I do see is such a level of economic depression that riots break out in those areas most heavily populated with government dependents and I'm not talking about the retirement communities.

^^^^
This X2

[Ruskiegunlover]

it will happen. The dims have balkanized our country, playing the race card, religion card, and class card.

I just always ask God to give me the wisdom to see it coming by at least 4-5 hours. That way, I get the hell out of town with my wife and family.

[dishman]

I also don't see civil war - especially one in which the military does the bidding of a rogue obummer. No way, no how.

If he were to try and declare martial law, he would get a note back from the JCS to the effect of "no thank you".

What I do see is such a level of economic depression that riots break out in those areas most heavily populated with government dependents and I'm not talking about the retirement communities.

As mriddick says, when the govt loses the ability to provide the free shit, that will be the spark that ignites the "multicultural urban centers" to use the dimocrap-speak.

i have to +1 that,once the free ride ends in the urban area..all hell will break loose there.
the irony is of coarse,most of the libtards that have pushed for this nannystate/handouts for votes or for there own guilt will be the ones to pay,as they also inhabit said urban areas,albeit the society hill sections,not north philly.
like my dad said,repubs are dems that got mugged.

[Warthogg]

I also don't see civil war - especially one in which the military does the bidding of a rogue obummer. No way, no how.

If he were to try and declare martial law, he would get a note back from the JCS to the effect of "no thank you".

It causes me nothing but pain to say this. If we allow history to guide, then we must admit the US military has never failed to act against the US civilian population when so ordered.

MacArthur, Eisenhower, Patton......all acted against WW I veterans many with wives and children.

MacArthur personally took control.....
Eisenhower acted as MacArthur's aide......
Patton lead 200 mounted troops with sabers drawn, five tanks were next and then about 300 infantry with rifles loaded and bayonets fixed.

Tear gas - by the hundreds of containers - was indiscriminately thrown into the veterans camps starting fires.........

Wart

[Warthogg]

Just as a historical note, I should add the attack on the veterans elected Franklin Delano Roosevelt.


Wart

[Warthogg]

Many years later, Eisenhower spoke his true feelings about MacArthur personally assuming command.

I paraphrase: 'I told that dumb son of a bitch (MacArthur) to not go down there.'



Wart

[gungorilla]

Just wait till all them welfare checks start bouncing.
Thinks might get a little interesting at that point.

[mriddick]

Saying the removal of the bonus marchers from Washington is an example of the military firing on innocent civilians is abit of a stretch.

[Ruskiegunlover]

but that will only be the start. One of the first things a dim admin would do, and likely a republican admin too, is try to take guns. They would arge that the voilence on the streets was due to gun ownership, and that without guns it would not be as bad. Then we'll see what happens.

[Warthogg]

Saying the removal of the bonus marchers from Washington is an example of the military firing on innocent civilians is abit of a stretch.

So you believe all the women, children and babies were guilty as hell. Not a surprise.


Wart

[mriddick]

So you believe all the women, children and babies were guilty as hell. Not a surprise.


Wart

Would it be worse to accuse our servicemen of being murderers of innocent civilians?