Depends what value you place on national sovereignty. Investors are supposed to assume the risks and losses as well as the gains based on rational decision making, even on a nation-to-nation basis. From Germany's point of view, this is turning into a one way bet; if Greece recovers, they own it - if it collapses, they gut it like a spoil of war without a shot being fired. My main concern here is that political agreements such as these, in which representatives make profound changes to the nature of a society in collusion with outside interests, without seeking the consent of the population cannot hold. I cannot help but think we'd be in a far clearer place had Papandreou (ex-PM) held his nerve and held a referendum on the bailout; the Greeks would have rejected it, but at least then we'd know we're looking at complete default.
While I agree that they cannot ignore the debt, piling yet more debt on top of the existing mountain of debt doesn't really solve the problem. The rate at which sovereign debt is piling up on Greek balance sheets now outstrips the country's ability to produce new wealth to pay back those debts. Greece never had a "strong" economy to start with, but the measures being passed are undermining the country's ability to sustain a functioning economy. The country is in an unsustainable situation, as anyone who's ever been in the nightmarish situation of playing different lenders against eachother to buy time will verify. The only viable option left for Greece is bankruptcy, which at least offers the possibility of drawing a line under the whole mess and moving on.
Bookmarks