what im getting at is that the "parts count" bullshit is not because the rifle has to fit into a "sporting clause" there is no "sporing clause" ownership ban. you can own an ak and it does not have to meet the "sporting clause"
its all semantics really, yes, ill agree 100% with what youve said about breaking 922 r laws all day long. the point im trying to make, is that that is all completely irrelevant, because the ownership of a contraband rifle and the laws thereof have absolutely nothing to do with the 922r laws. its apples and oranges. im not even arguing that POSSESSION of said rifle is against the law. all im saying is that the RIFLE ITSELF is illegal. the op stated "is there anything to worry about" and again, im not going to argue the fact that he may or may not have to worry about being arrested, but again, the rifle itself, is illegal, and if found, will be destroyed as such. imo, having the govt take my property and destroy it would definitely fall under the category of "something to worry about"
the way im seeing this conversation is like someone asking, "if i kill a girl, and have sex with her, its not rape, cuz she never told me to stop" yes, that may be true and you can argue that heres nothing wrong with that all day long, but the fact of the matter is, killing her in the first place was illegal.
Bookmarks