I'm going to try one of the H. Hupmann #2's with a pour of EW-SB-2004.
I 've read some pretty remarkable reviews for these, some even preferring them over Montecristo #2's.
So we'll see here a bit later.
Nice read. My favorite cigar at the time was the Lonsdale when they made it!
Buy It Cheap!
Stack It Deep!
Original Member-July-1999!
H. Upmann? I've never had one, I try to stay in the 48 to 52 ring gauge range, so lonsdales are not what I tend to look at. I know they're really popular tho, our guy Stan likes them quite a lot.
I've been working on this #2 for about half an hour now, its pretty damn good. I also like the Mag-50's from H. Upmann. I think this line is somewhat under appreciated. Oh well, it keeps the price in check.
There Corona's are a good cigar also. Always prefer the 42 or 44 size cigar.
http://www.cigars-review.org/H-Upmann-Coronas.htm
Buy It Cheap!
Stack It Deep!
Original Member-July-1999!
Okay you people. I'm about 2/3 of the way through the H. Upmann #2. I paired this with a couple pours of the Evan Williams Single Barrel circa 2004, barrel #3.
Damn this is a good looking smoke!
Gotta say; I'm pleasantly pleased with this pairing. Its as good a pairing a RASS with a pour of Rittenhouse BIB.
The EVSB is thick and oily, has a nice balance of sweet and spice and hits about every note bourbon drinkers cherish. At $25 a 750ml bottle, its a bargain buy.
Back to the stogie. These are often compared to the Monte #2's. But thus far, I see them as unique from one another. The Monte is all coffee and chocolate, but the H. Upmann has more floral and spice notes, especially cinnamon. Its a great smoke, perfect draw, no burn issues, construction seems first rate, and it tastes great.
All in all a great pairing, I would highly recommend both.
Bookmarks