Obama’s Chief Of Staff Admits They Want Tyranny (more or less)

[5.56NATO]

The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/01/26/...-want-tyranny/







That's it, let it all out.

[skorpion]

FBHO with a thorny stick!

[Schuetzenman]

Sick semper tyrannis is all I have to say.

[alismith]

He's really pushing for another revolution....going all out for it, actually.

[ltorlo64]

He's really pushing for another revolution....going all out for it, actually.

He is not pushing for one, he is actively leading one.

[Krupski]

The White House recently made an amazing—and disturbingly un-American—pronouncement regarding its desire to move its agenda via executive actions. In describing the administration’s intent to pursue “audacious” executive orders, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough stated the Obama administration’s desire that its actions “not be subjected to undoing through [Congress] or otherwise.”

Of course, Americans are accustomed to presidents using executive authority to forward their preferred public policies, especially when the popular will reflected in Congress stymies their agenda. But think carefully about the end goal animating the Obama administration’s upcoming actions, as articulated by McDonough: policy decisions that cannot be undone by Congress “or otherwise,” which seems broad enough a term to encompass the judiciary or any other source of government authority.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/01/26/...-want-tyranny/







That's it, let it all out.

I thought ANY Presidential action could be undone?

If not, then that's a dictatorship - plain and simple.

[5.56NATO]

FBHO with a thorny stick!

LOL!!!!

[5.56NATO]

He is not pushing for one, he is actively leading one.

I agree. His regime represents a marxist muslim insurgency. Failure is built in to such, so no worries.

[alismith]

I agree. His regime represents a marxist muslim insurgency. Failure is built in to such, so no worries.

The only problem is we're living in the time before it fails.

[Helen Keller]

go for it.