Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 37

Thread: math skills needed.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394

    math skills needed.




    I know the length, so what would the width at the widest point be ????
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Wreckless driving on dirty back roads
    Posts
    8,959
    800 needed here also.
    While no one ever listens to me,
    I am constantly being told to be quiet.

    In a world of snowflakes,
    be the heat..

  3. #3
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    OOOH! OOOH! It's been so many semesters since I took trigonometry, let me dust off my Precalculus textbook and give this a try...

    Firstly, if we were to split those two right-angles so they form a triangle with the known angle (24°) on the left side, then we know...

    180 - 24 = 156 / 2 = 78° each

    THEREFORE, if we take 78 away from 90, we are left with 12° angles forming the base of the new imaginary triangle on the right side.

    THEREFORE, if we subtract 12 times 2 from 180 we determine that the angle on the far right side opposite of the known angle is 156°.

    (Following me so far?)

    THEREFORE, we have our new triangle with measurements as follows:

    angle A = 156 degrees
    angle B = 12 degrees
    angle C = 12 degrees

    side a = (widest point)
    side b = 400m
    side c = 400m


    Now, using the Law of Cosines to find missing side a (which is the widest point we're after):

    a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc * cosA

    a^2 = 400^2 + 400^2 - 2(400*400)*cos(156°)

    a^2 = 160000 + 160000 - (320000 * -0.9135454574626)

    a^2 = 320000 - (-292334.546388032)

    a^2 = 612334.546388032

    (square root both sides)

    a = 782.518 meters

    See? Didn't even have to use the ASS method (where you only know Angle-Side-Side.)
    Last edited by LAGC; 11-02-2017 at 07:04 PM.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  4. #4
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    We better get Krupski in here to check my work, I may be a bit rusty...
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  5. #5
    Senior Member Full Otto's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Helen Keller View Post
    I know the length, so what would the width at the widest point be ????
    You building a garage?
    For peace of mind, resign as general manager of the universe

  6. #6
    Guns Network Contributor 01/2015 Altarboy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,928
    We gotta find Helen Keller a girl.

  7. #7
    Guns Network Contributor 01/2015 Altarboy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,928
    And Kudos to LAGC. Good work old boy!

  8. #8
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Altarboy View Post
    We gotta find Helen Keller a girl.
    im surrounded by breeders and idiots.






    You building a garage?

    newp...... 1/144 scale star destroyer.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  9. #9
    Senior Member Full Otto's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Helen Keller View Post
    newp...... 1/144 scale star destroyer.
    That sounds pretty cool
    For peace of mind, resign as general manager of the universe

  10. #10
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Wait a minute... it looks like I fucked up.

    Using the ASS method to figure out the length, I came up with 1753.081 meters.

    That means those congruent unknown angles can't be right angles, but rather slightly obtuse. My new calculations came up with 114.326 degrees.

    So lets try this again...

    180 - 24 = 156 / 2 = 78° each

    THEREFORE, if we take 78 away from 114.326 degrees this time, we are left with 36.326° angles forming the base of the new imaginary triangle on the right side.

    THEREFORE, if we subtract 36.326 times 2 from 180 we determine that the angle on the far right side opposite of the known angle is actually 107.348 degrees.

    (Following me so far?)

    THEREFORE, we have our new triangle with measurements as follows:

    angle A = 107.348 degrees
    angle B = 36.326 degrees
    angle C = 36.326 degrees

    side a = (widest point)
    side b = 400m
    side c = 400m


    Now, using the Law of Cosines to find missing side a (which is the widest point we're after):

    a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc * cosA

    a^2 = 400^2 + 400^2 - 2(400*400)*cos(107.348°)

    a^2 = 160000 + 160000 - (320000 * -0.2981746281666314)

    a^2 = 320000 - (-95415.881)

    a^2 = 415415.881

    (square root both sides)

    a = 644.527641 meters

    That looks better.

    (I just checked the solutions on that EMMAths site, and that's the answer they came up with as well: width = 645m, length = 1753m.)
    Last edited by LAGC; 11-02-2017 at 10:19 PM.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  11. #11
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    Well then ..

    convert that to feet and then to 1/144 scale .
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  12. #12
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    1753m = 5751.312 feet / 144 = 39.94 feet long
    645m = 2116.14 feet / 144 = 14.6954 feet wide

    Might be a tight fit for a garage.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  13. #13
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    how'd i screw that up.

    came out to 72.5" long and 33" wide.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  14. #14
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    According to Wikipedia, Star Destroyers come in lengths between 1600 and 2915 meters.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Destroyer

    So if you're basing your 1:144 calculations off of that higher figure, it might be closer to what you're estimating.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  15. #15
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Or do you mean inches?

    Here's a 1/2700 Imperial Star Destroyer Kit: https://www.revell.com/model-kits/en...t/85-6459.html

    It says its dimensions are: 23-1/16" length x 13-7/32" width x 5-25/32" height

    If something that small is more what you're looking for.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  16. #16
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    inches.

    i came up with 72.5 length and just over 33 wide ..

    i musta fucked up my scale calculations.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

  17. #17
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Or to use another example,

    Here's a 1/144 Millennium Falcon: https://www.amazon.com/Bandai-Scale-.../dp/B014VTPQ22

    One of the reviewers said the model itself is about 9" length and 7" width.

    And we all know how much bigger Star Destroyers are compared to Millennium Falcons.

    Remember that one episode, where the Falcon was sucked up in the Star Destroyer's massive cargo bay?

    Yep, a 1/144 Star Destroyer would be HUGE.
    Last edited by LAGC; 11-02-2017 at 11:31 PM.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  18. #18
    Senior Member NAPOTS's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    3,752
    LAGC got the right answer.
    I did it differently than he did though.

    1753m long x 644.6m wide

    @1:144 scale thats 479.3" long x 176.2" wide

    probably too big for your garage.

  19. #19
    Registered User LAGC's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,655
    Quote Originally Posted by NAPOTS View Post
    LAGC got the right answer.
    I did it differently than he did though.
    Yeah, now that I look at it again, there's really no need to calculate that imaginary triangle on the right or figure out the other angles like I did above.

    You can just use the SAS (Side-Angle-Side) method instead, using the known angle (24°), and the known sides (1550m).

    Ah well. It was fun anyway.
    Last edited by LAGC; 11-02-2017 at 11:53 PM.
    "That tyranny has all the vices both of democracy and oligarchy is evident. As of oligarchy so of tyranny, the end is wealth; (for by wealth only can the tyrant maintain either his guard or his luxury). Both mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of their arms." -- Aristotle, Book V, 350 B.C.E

  20. #20
    Senior Member Helen Keller's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockin' a Piss
    Posts
    8,394
    i found a nifty calculator , I have to use 1/935 scale based upon 5751' long and 2116' wide.

    gives me just over 72.6" long and 28.8" wide.

    i may possibly have fucked that up as well but that's what im rolling with.
    PRAISE KEK
    FATHER OF CHAOS
    BRINGER OF DAY
    IN THY WEBBED HANDS WE PLACE OUR FAITH
    SHADILAY, SHADILAY!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •