What Does The ATF's Latest Bump Stock Comment Mean?
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/09/wha...#axzz60OVR5UIZ
Steve
What Does The ATF's Latest Bump Stock Comment Mean?
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/09/wha...#axzz60OVR5UIZ
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
ATF Admits It Lacked Regulatory Authority to Ban Bump Stocks
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/at...iRFNGlVvf7mWQw
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
Gun-control fail: Less than 1% of 500,000 bump stocks surrendered
https://www.wnd.com/2019/10/report-t...s-surrendered/
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
Rather than see these results as what will happen if the Dimocrats are stupid enough to try a mandatory gun ban, they'll jump to the wrong conclusion once again, that this would have worked if it had been done "correctly."
By "correctly," they mean door-to-door home invasion.
And, they won't stop until they go that route.
"Valar morghulis; valar dohaeris."
Commucrats are most efficient at converting sins and crimes to accidents or misunderstandings.-Oswald Bastable
Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless.
Freedom isn't free.
"Attitude is the paintbrush that colors our world." TV Series, Haven.
My Spirit Animal has rabies.
I'd rather be an American than a Democrat.
"If you can make a man afraid, you can control him" Netflix Series, The Irregulars
Court: No Compensation for Destroyed Bump Stocks
https://www.guns.com/news/2019/10/28...nhw8vAycwPvhz4
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
Two things the judge said were totally wrong, or just plain scary:
“The law is different in this case because the government, as the sovereign, has the power to take property that is dangerous, diseased, or used in criminal activities without compensation,” said Senior Circuit Judge Loren A. Smith in his nine-page ruling.
This could apply to all guns, cars, ice skates, knives, bows and arrows, hammers, skateboards, etc. Just about everything, in everyday life, is dangerous if not used correctly.
“machine guns,” which was how bump stocks were reclassified, are not protected by the Second Amendment."
Actually, the Second Amendment applies to ALL firearms used by the military. It's our government that has infringed on that right that has brought to to where we are today.
1938 was the year the government made its move infringing the 2nd Amendment. Up until then, machine guns were protected by the 2nd Amendment. It all went downhill from there.
Just by stating his argument against the plaintiffs, this judge has set a precedent that could be used in future cases where firearms might be confiscated on a national scale.
Last edited by alismith; 10-28-2019 at 10:40 AM.
"Valar morghulis; valar dohaeris."
Commucrats are most efficient at converting sins and crimes to accidents or misunderstandings.-Oswald Bastable
Making good people helpless won't make bad people harmless.
Freedom isn't free.
"Attitude is the paintbrush that colors our world." TV Series, Haven.
My Spirit Animal has rabies.
I'd rather be an American than a Democrat.
"If you can make a man afraid, you can control him" Netflix Series, The Irregulars
Funny how something that according to the words "shall not be infringed" can be considered not covered or protected.
It's like saying the alphabet shall not be infringed, but the letters X, Y, and Z are not protected and therefore can be banned.
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Ban on Gun 'Bump Stocks'
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news...re-bump-stocks
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
BUMP STOCK RULING VACATED, TO BE REHEARD
https://www.guns.com/news/bump-stock...-dkXrppIvIHiNY
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
D.C. Circuit Upholds Decision That Bump Stocks Are 'Machine Guns'
https://www.firearmsnews.com/editori...campaign=aug24
Steve
After today, it's all historical.
A select few who have moved from SIMPLY upholding and interpreting the Constitution have become the select few who have a higher moral authority over the lives and property of 333,000,000 US Citizens. Shall not be infringed does not mean shall not be infringed, however, freedom of speech means an 18 year old girl can spread her legs for $$ bills while swinging on a pole in a dimly lit establishment filled with bar hags and other assorted drunkards.
Some try to say that the second amendment applies to weapons of the time period. If that is true, then their first amendment rights end when they use a microphone to broadcast a statement in pod-cast. Freedom of the press also stops when they broadcast the news over the internet, on invisible waves in the air that we can view on a television set!
Are bump-stocks just an advancement like an electronic microphone versus an "old fashioned" megaphone versus just yelling at the top of one's lungs?
Bookmarks