Illinois town empowers sheriff to confiscate guns and magazines (see what happens when Democrats are in charge?)

[tank_monkey]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ity-magazines/

April 3, 2018
The Chicago suburb of Deerfield, Illinois, is giving residents 60 days to get rid of their “assault weapons” and “high capacity” magazines and empowering the police chief to confiscate them from those who refuse to give them up.

Deerfield previously allowed ownership of such firearms and magazines but had strict storage requirements in place for them. Now, the firearms and magazines will be illegal to posses in one’s home, even if properly stored.



The Chicago Tribune reports the “new ordinance prohibits the possession, sale and manufacturing of certain types of assault weapons and large capacity magazines within the village.” Those in violation of the ordinance will face fines of $250 to $1,000 a day.

Deerfield’s original “assault weapons” ban, including storage requirements. was instituted in 2013. The new ban is being put in place because of instances wherein “assault weapons” have been used criminally in Parkland, Florida, Sutherland Springs, Texas, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Orlando Florida. The ordinance warns that stock “assault weapons” are “customizable to become even more dangerous weapons of mass casualties and destruction.”

[l921428x]

So what role did a human have in parkland Florida? Guess it does not matter.

[LAGC]

I don't see any mention of the mayor's political affiliation, nor that of the city council that passed this ordinance. Usually such local races are non-partisan, so they don't run as "Democrats" or "Republicans."

Of course, this is a suburb of Shitcago we're talking about... but usually the suburbs are more conservative than the urban areas proper.

Guess the moral of the story is to vet your local candidates thoroughly, regardless of what political party they run (or don't run) under.

[1 Patriot-of-many]

I don't see any mention of the mayor's political affiliation, nor that of the city council that passed this ordinance. Usually such local races are non-partisan, so they don't run as "Democrats" or "Republicans."

Of course, this is a suburb of Shitcago we're talking about... but usually the suburbs are more conservative than the urban areas proper.

Guess the moral of the story is to vet your local candidates thoroughly, regardless of what political party they run (or don't run) under.

Hog shit. 90% of the antigun are democrats, 10% rino.

[imanaknut]

I hope the police chief takes the moron who signed the law and expects it to be enforced along with him as he goes to collect these evil items. I wonder how much blood will flow when they come up on that few who will not give them up.

[alismith]

I hope the police chief takes the moron who signed the law and expects it to be enforced along with him as he goes to collect these evil items. I wonder how much blood will flow when they come up on that few who will not give them up.

That's what I was wondering, too. There's going to be someone there who isn't going to put up with this crap. Nor, will he surrender his guns without giving them a few bullets first.

It's going to be interesting to see how all this plays out.

[Krupski]

I don't see any mention of the mayor's political affiliation, nor that of the city council that passed this ordinance. Usually such local races are non-partisan, so they don't run as "Democrats" or "Republicans."

Of course, this is a suburb of Shitcago we're talking about... but usually the suburbs are more conservative than the urban areas proper.

Guess the moral of the story is to vet your local candidates thoroughly, regardless of what political party they run (or don't run) under.

That's almost as hilarious as wondering if Dianne Feinswine is a democrat......