Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: ATF Potentially Rethinking AR-, AK-Based Pistols

  1. #1
    Team GunsNet Gold 07/2012 / Super Moderator Gunreference1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AZ USA
    Posts
    8,092

    Post ATF Potentially Rethinking AR-, AK-Based Pistols

    After today, it's all historical.

  2. #2
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    11,138
    What ever happened to "shall not be infringed"?

  3. #3
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southwest, Missouri
    Posts
    190
    I don't claim to be the sharpest knife in the block so maybe some one here can tell me what I'm missing. How does the ATF have so much power that they can just change their minds one day and this or that is legal or not?

    They are not law makers...Right? So what am I missing?

    As far as "shall not be infringed", they started that crap in 1934 my opinion. Then in 1968, 86 and 94. That's just off the top of my head. I'm sure I am missing some.

    I don't need or want a full auto weapon, a bump stock, short barreled shotgun and so on. But I believe it should be our right without having to pay a freaking tax. Although a shorter shotgun could be very handy as a home defense gun. But I guess a short shotgun is waaay more deadly than a long one... But seriously...What am I missing as far as the ATF making laws???

  4. #4
    Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by imanaknut View Post
    What ever happened to "shall not be infringed"?
    Exactly!!I'm so tired of their bullshit.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •