After today, it's all historical.
Nice to see someone in our government actually trying to advance the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
And while I agree that if I need an ID to exercise my second amendment right, what is wrong requiring an ID to vote, which is a privilege and not a written right. As someone on the Ammoland site said, if it ok to require an ID to buy a firearm, then why is it restricting to require an ID to vote, unless the idea is to restrict the same people who can't seem to be able to get a FREE ID to vote also restrict their ability to buy a firearm?
Bookmarks