After today, it's all historical.
While someone needs to proof-read that article, I wouldn't put anything past AT and unconstitutional F.
It was ok before it wasn't ok but we decided it might be ok as long as it is not ok but only if you do XYZ. And that is AT and unconstitutional F illogical thinking.
What about "shall not be infringed" do they not understand? Seems to be the don't understand anything. Except subjugation.
Bookmarks