Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: ATF position on pistol grip 'shotguns' creates new danger

  1. #1
    Team GunsNet Gold 07/2012 / Super Moderator Gunreference1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AZ USA
    Posts
    13,139

    Post ATF position on pistol grip 'shotguns' creates new danger

    David Codrea
    Gun Rights Examiner

    ATF position on pistol grip 'shotguns' creates new danger

    November 15th, 2010 12:13 pm ET

    An interpretation by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that pistol grip shotguns are not shotguns has created an unforeseen legal liability for owners of such firearms. ATF’s Nov. 2009 FFL Newsletter declared:

    Certain commercially produced firearms do not fall within the definition of shotgun under the GCA even though they utilize a shotgun shell for ammunition. For example, firearms that come equipped with a pistol grip in place of the buttstock are not shotguns as defined by the GCA.

    To read the rest of the story click the link below.

    http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-i...tes-new-danger

    Steve
    After today, it's all historical.

  2. #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    North East PA
    Posts
    1,333
    This is from ATF Ruling 95-3 :

    (f) Destructive device. --The term "destructive device" means
    * * * (2) any type of weapon by whatever name known which will, or
    which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action
    of an explosive or other propellant, the barrel or barrels of which
    have a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter, except a
    shotgun or shotgun shell
    which the Secretary or his delegate finds
    is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting
    purposes . . .'
    The 2nd Amendment : Washington didn't use his right to free speech to defeat the British, he shot them.

  3. #3
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,299
    Interesting read and makes me wonder if there will be a major statement from NRA and GOA. As far as I am concerned any object used to destroy something is a destructive device, like a baseball bat, or a golf club, or an automobile, or...

    ATF, out of control, and siting an object as being illegal based on an unconstitutional law, the 1968 Lyndon Johnson Gun Control Act, also known by him as step one in taking over the country as it's first dictator. Both the agency and the act need to go.

  4. #4
    Administrator Krupski's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    ┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐
    Posts
    15,653
    Quote Originally Posted by Moebrown20 View Post
    This is from ATF Ruling 95-3 :
    What, exactly, is a "shotgun"?

    I have a Remington 870 with an 18.5 inch barrel. Anyone I know would call it a "shotgun". It's a 12 gauge, so it has a bore over 1/2 inch diameter. It's got a smooth bore barrel and fires "shotshells".

    What if I buy a rifled barrel for it to shoot slugs? Is it now a "rifle"? Does this mean the rifled barrel can be 16 inches instead of 18?

    If it's a "rifle" with a rifled barrel, then it's illegal because it's got a bore over 1/2 inch diameter.

    Hmmm... I'm going in circles here, getting nowhere and now wondering just what the hell IS legal and what isn't...

    Fucking BATFE.... idiots.
    Gentlemen may prefer Blondes, but Real Men prefer Redheads!

  5. #5
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,299
    To throw gasoline on the fire, Taurus made the Judge with a rifled barrel so that when firing the .410 shotgun round, you would not be considered having a short barrel shotgun, or worse, a sawed off shotgun since it doesn't have a buttstock.

    So if you had a shotgun with a rifled barrel, a 10ga for instance, could you cut it to 16.10"???? And then would ATF consider it an artillery piece since it is over 1/2"???

  6. #6
    Iron Pumping Bastard aliceinchains's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Lancaster County PA
    Posts
    1,950
    Quote Originally Posted by Krupski View Post
    What, exactly, is a "shotgun"?

    I have a Remington 870 with an 18.5 inch barrel. Anyone I know would call it a "shotgun". It's a 12 gauge, so it has a bore over 1/2 inch diameter. It's got a smooth bore barrel and fires "shotshells".

    What if I buy a rifled barrel for it to shoot slugs? Is it now a "rifle"? Does this mean the rifled barrel can be 16 inches instead of 18?

    If it's a "rifle" with a rifled barrel, then it's illegal because it's got a bore over 1/2 inch diameter.

    Hmmm... I'm going in circles here, getting nowhere and now wondering just what the hell IS legal and what isn't...

    Fucking BATFE.... idiots.



    Good post Krupski.
    I am sitting in my angry chair!

  7. #7
    Senior Member raxar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    PA, where the cold is only matched by the isolation
    Posts
    3,797
    so if you own a shotty pistol grip and a shotgun are you in "constructive possession"?

  8. #8
    Team GunsNet Gold 07/2012 / Super Moderator Gunreference1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AZ USA
    Posts
    13,139

    Post

    Friday, November 19, 2010

    "This whole (Pistol Grip Shotgun) Destructive Device issue is easily the hugest single regulatory f-ckup in the history of ATF."



    I received this email from a fellow who has studied the internal workings of the ATF for many years:


    -----Original Message-----
    From: (Redacted)
    To: Mike Vanderboegh, et. al. (Redacted)
    Sent: Thu, Nov 18, 2010
    Subject: SAR and pistol grip shotguns

    (Redacted) said somebody told him to check out the latest SAR (Small Arms Review) for some stuff on "Pistol Grip Firearms." From what I can see (attached), the only thing is what amounts to a copy of the 2009 FFL Newsletter information. No analysis, just straight This Is What ATF Says.

    This whole Destructive Device issue is easily the hugest single regulatory fuckup in the history of ATF. The only other fuckup that even comes minimally close, and really not hardly at all, is that double-barreled sawed-off shotguns that were at least 12" but less than 18" in length had a $1 transfer tax (rather than $200) from 1938 to 1954 because the language to provide a $1 tax for the Marble's Game Getter Gun included the phrase "two attached barrels," so it by mistake also applied to certain sawed-off shotguns. The Congress let that one rock along for some 16 years. But since there was the registration requirement, which people didn't like, there was probably not wide manufacture of sawed-off shotguns, given the $200 "making" tax and manufacturer's license fees.

    To read the rest of the story click the link below.

    http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogsp...p-shotgun.html

    Steve
    After today, it's all historical.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •