Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: U.N. Ammunition Shipping Requirements Loosened

  1. #1
    Team GunsNet Gold 07/2012 / Super Moderator Gunreference1's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    AZ USA
    Posts
    13,195

    Post U.N. Ammunition Shipping Requirements Loosened

    U.N. Ammunition Shipping Requirements Loosened

    December 20, 2010

    (GunReports.com) -- The United Nations has adopted changes to international ammunition-shipping requirements sought by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI).

    The rule change essentially protects the industry from a shift in U.S. shipping regulations that potentially would have cost the industry $300 million per year. The net result is that while the regulations will change, shipment of ammunition in the U.S will continue without additional fees and handling requirements. The change harmonizes U.S. regulations with international requirements, reduces overly strict shipping requirements by truck and vessel and facilitates shipment of ammunition to consumers worldwide by parcel post.

    To read the rest of the story click the link below.

    http://www.gunreports.com/news/news/...ts_2580-1.html

    Steve
    After today, it's all historical.

  2. #2
    Senior Member ATAK, Inc.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Back in Lost Wages!
    Posts
    1,981
    This is a surprizing move with the UN, who is not a friend of the 2nd!

  3. #3
    Moderator & Team Gunsnet Platinum 07/2011 O.S.O.K.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Deep In The Heart of Texas
    Posts
    9,363
    Wierd. But good.
    ~Nemo me impune lacessit~




  4. #4
    Administrator imanaknut's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Indiana, a state that is trying to remain free.
    Posts
    12,311
    Somehow this scares me. What are they really after? I can't believe they are loosening any regulation that is firearm related.

  5. #5
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,513
    Quote Originally Posted by imanaknut View Post
    Somehow this scares me. What are they really after? I can't believe they are loosening any regulation that is firearm related.
    Ditto.
    Either hell just froze over or they have something up their sleeve.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Mr. Rodgers's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by ATAK, Inc. View Post
    This is a surprizing move with the UN, who is not a friend of the 2nd!
    I second that, frankly I am stunned.

  7. #7
    Senior Member btcave's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    On a hill with the view of the rest of my life.
    Posts
    2,236
    What's in the fine print...
    Trying to get on the no fly list, one post at a time.

  8. #8
    Moderator & Team Gunsnet Platinum 07/2011 O.S.O.K.'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Deep In The Heart of Texas
    Posts
    9,363
    You know... the more I think about this the more I'd bet there's some money going into somebody's pocket... that would make perfect sense with the UN...
    ~Nemo me impune lacessit~




  9. #9
    Senior Member Penguin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Penguin Land
    Posts
    2,287
    I wonder what the fine print is, it sounds to good to be true.
    Doobie Doobie Doo..

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •